4
Sadness 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not at all.

Fire away.

8
Sadness 8 points ago +9 / -1

Don't tell me that PArisian wokesters/diversity hires tried to feed the athletes rabbit food? And no aircon?

I live in a family that has four men training and eating to match (never mind the research into supplements and further trainings etc.). There would literally be a riot if there was no meat, even for a day; or more insidiuosly, no aircon, at the height of summer. The mad desire to suddenly go and eat at a resaurant and paying four times what the meal is worth; or the ostentatious setting up of an outside hose-shower in the garden while glowering, even.

Here is all this globalist money being thrown about and they can't even look after the star attractions? I mean, any regular self-respecting chef could have advised that serving a vegan menu to all, was suicidal.

This after the poo-Seine debacle.

Outrageous.

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

That reminds me of the song

Blood on the rooftops

6
Sadness 6 points ago +6 / -0

yeah, huh?

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

A demented Narcissist, experiencing a Narcissistic Collapse. How wonderful. Not.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reuters, though. But RT reported on it on Jul 26. Perhaps Reuters is deigning to read Russian media now?

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, bots are an AI-level of stupid.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Erm is it because the supposed Russian Twitter users (on a VPN) only had 15 followers, while Musk has millions? That implies that the Russian hackers were ineffectual. Oh wait.

Also, how is he going to censor the owner of Twitter/X? By banning the platform? LOL.

The thing is: One only looks at stuff that one wants to. So, if someone opines something that is BS, we can all laugh at it, and point at it. Brutal.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Usually when children are killed I need to know more about the situation, because people use it to pull hearstrings, so cui bono?

Only human skin-suit animals kill children. But, I don't know who is trying to actually MAKE a war happen.

7
Sadness 7 points ago +7 / -0

They honestly made an effort to tone done the rhetoric.

So it went from Laterally Hitler to Weird

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I think the Supreme Court might have a few things to say about it.

I don't believe it will happen - it is a Hail Mary attempt.

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. And, I am not sure that the executive branch can just force through a constitutional amendment on the Judicial branch like that. You kinda need the Senate and Congress to agree to it. (Is it 3/4 of them?). A ND I think that nine is fine, one does not need some cockameemee scheme of trying to match it to the proportions that existed before (i.e. 200+ judges - can you imagine?), and thereby getting the right to pack the court.

The Supreme court already says that the immunity extends to just about everything a President does - except for obvio criminal stuff. But then no-one has taken previous presidents to task over war-crimes - so I don't know how 'no-one is above the law' works. We haven't even started on Biden's money-making enterprises.

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Um. Israel is not in NATO? Since when do they tell NATO what to do?

Oh wait.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um. I think they are entering the Golan Heights, which does not belong to Israel - who are merely occupying it.

But I suppose Israelis think they own something when they occupy it, with arms.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jordan is a hotbed of UK and USA spooks, just saying.

when Trump dstroyed ISIS.

He did no such thing.

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think so. The Turks see it as intervening in a genocide that is already occurring. Someone has to step up.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›