3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think he's going to like where the probe that he's brought upon himself is going to go...

11
Seret 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm not really clear on how this will matter within two month's time, anyway. The Senate that's in power today isn't the same that will be in place when Trump is inaugurated, so how does this vote actually matter in the first place?

4
Seret 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean, how is this going to work? How could this affect a new session of the Senate, when the session that's voting now is about to end?

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have they stopped counting in Georgia? I checked the numbers reported about half an hour ago and noted them down, and I just checked again and they haven't changed at all

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is this map accurate? They've hard called Virginia for Harris, but other sources have Trump in a growing lead

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know either, but right now, I can imagine it

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, better for both sides to do it than just one; do you think Soros or Winfry or Zuckerberg cared about people being unhappy about them meddling? Just sitting back and taking it is how we got in this mess in the first place. If Musk is going to do it to, but for Trump, then maybe people will get off their asses and actually come up with a law to prevent this kind of thing altogether. As it stands, Trump already said that he'd be using the Dem's tactics against them. If it's legal for them to do it, then do it right back.

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

The number is apparently up to 32 thousand now, which is over half the original population back in 2020.

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump announced an upcoming event there last night. He said that "It might be the last that we see of him, that he might not make it out"

7
Seret 7 points ago +7 / -0

That would be because there isn't anything good to be heard about him. He's either doing this to save face, because he has an ulterior motive, or because someone is forcing his hand.

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know people who live in the area, and this is the first that I've heard of it being a sanctuary city...

In fact, the mayor recently reinforced that Springfield isn't a sanctuary city

4
Seret 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ducks, geese, cats, dogs...

There was one account of a family who's cat went missing, and it was found hanging from a tree after it was carved apart and eaten.

6
Seret 6 points ago +6 / -0

Zelda as the lead character in her own game isn't really an issue though, is it? It's not like she's just a female copy of Link. Zelda has always been her own character, for whichever iteration is present.

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was on the cusp, anyway - although, granted, that was more fan-driven than anything that Nintendo ever actually suggested. See Bowsette - although "she" isn't actually canon, fans ran with a "Princess" powerup that was designed to allow Toadette to temporarily transform into a faux-Peach. That powerup was given to Bowser to create "Bowsette", a clone of Peach, but with Bowser's horns, shell, and tail. Now, it's not uncommon to see a certain sect of fans suggest that Mario would be saving trans-Bowser from Peach, instead.

2
Seret 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't this affect retirement accounts, including IRAs and 401Ks, as well?

8
Seret 8 points ago +8 / -0

What do you mean? This isn't even a photograph, it's an illustration.

1
Seret 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are the vote drop boxes in play this time around? I might have missed it, but I haven't heard any discussion about them yet. They were pivotal to their strategy before.

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I built one of those as a part of my Eagle Project! Who knew that a seventeen year old kid could thwart the government so easily?

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t even get the point of them being there. They’re not contributing anything, they’re just doing their normal content with a different backdrop, and only rarely covering the RNC itself.

3
Seret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m pretty sure it was pretty obvious to the cartel that Trump wouldn’t be as placid and accommodating as Biden. Just the fact that he would be shutting down the border would be enough to motivate them. This comment might as well have been to add a can of gasoline to a burning oil field.

13
Seret 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yes, and?

Trump has already made his decision. Does anyone think that Trump doesn't know Vance's history, and that he hasn't extensively vetted his choices? Or, do you perhaps think that you've had more opportunity to gain an insight into Vance than Trump has?

What exactly are you trying to suggest?

4
Seret 4 points ago +4 / -0

It also exposed a lot of things that had been hidden from sight before, ranging from the way the general population will react to a perceived emergency, to the way people will react to anyone who doesn't conform to the narrative, to the multi-layered justice and enforcement system. A lot of people at least started to wake up, even if bleary-eyed and confused.

It wasn't all for nothing, but it was a series of lessons that came with a high cost.

view more: Next ›