5
SorosOrMuskPickOne 5 points ago +5 / -0

People here ask all the time where we would be without Q. I believe Nick Fuentes and his listeners is the answer.

7
SorosOrMuskPickOne 7 points ago +7 / -0

Practically it does though, because the longer it's unadjudicated the more people just forget or lose interest...or the main players just die of old age. Gotta strike while the iron is hot. It's hot for 3 more years. Maybe only 1 if we lose the House.

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

FBI cleared her and she's back at her job now. The Blaze also added a note in the original story that there's no indication from the FBI that she's a suspect currently. Just the messenger.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's been reported she's back in her job now after being cleared by the FBI

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

The prices on lumber are outrageous though. Can't we build homes people will buy out of something else?

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's a Brahman and by extension so is he. It's like how Trump's family is mostly Jewish. You have to keep up with population growth coming from anywhere but the West.

Christianity vs Judaism was a cool subplot a thousand year ago, but now we will both be in the minority in just 100 years. Our grandkids won't distinguish. Trump knew this when he married his daughter off to Kushner.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

America's first Indian president. I don't mean this in a negative way. Its inevitable. Population growth is favoring Chinese, Indians, and Africans.

The Russian/Ukrainian war will be the last one where two European countries argue over territory.

4
SorosOrMuskPickOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

Really not impressed with Halligans courtroom misfires before this, and with Bondi for not pushing her nomination through when the shutdown at least presented an opportunity. The statute of limitations presented a challenge, but moving through this so haphazardly shouldn't have been the alternative.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think just the centralized program is gone.

More than anything else, I think the plan to use Grok AI was impeded by the difficulty in integrating too many systems with very different taxonomies and legacy fields, and that it couldn't really be articulated legally what they were looking for doing so. Elon alluded to this when he was talking about the need to update all the systems with a code tying it to specific budgets/spending bills in order to be useful.

AI is great, but it has no real value if the underlying data isn't where it needs to be. It will probably take the concerted effort of several more years to get it close.

Quite simply, there's no more need for AI or Elon's vast knowledge currently. They shut down some big programs, but mass fraud is better targeted inside each individual organization itself. We'll find some faulty payments, etc, but not on a grand scale that a regular audit wouldn't catch.

Edit - also the fact that there's just so much that is still paper-based stored inside a mountain. That blew Elon's mind but any government contractor would tell you that's been a problem for decades.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen AI. It would depend on what they fed into it, and the weighting coefficients. Both are extremely subjective.

3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

What can I say, I'm somewhat of an amateur expert myself lol. Don't take my comments personally. After all I just have an opinion, like all of us. I'm not saying yours is wrong, I'm just explaining mine.

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been my biggest criticism of the 4D chess argument. Rather than just simply accepting a small loss, accepting a change of strategy, or outright admitting someone sucks, instead expectations get rolled into a bigger and bigger ball of hopium that no president can possibly meet. It actually makes things harder for Trump because he has to both succeed and succeed in a way that overcomes peoples sunk cost fallacy.

Im not gonna make Trump succeed and have Kash turn into a competent FBI director in order to feel happy. I'd rather just get a new director and be on with it.

Mike Pence is what we get if we won't accept someone isn't up to the job.

4
SorosOrMuskPickOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sometimes people suck at jobs that we thought they would be good at. Isn't that real life? Is there no room for error?

I'm only commenting directly because I don't believe in hiding when called out.

Edit - to be clear I believe there's a plan, I just also believe what Mike Tyson said about plans too

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's actually insane that the House took a 45 day break on the taxpayers dime and this is what they prioritized voting on when they got back

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's neither. I think he's just not suited for the pressures of the job. Additional investigation beyond the lone wolf theory requires time, patience and a willingness to not accept simplicity as an easy out. I'm not sure if he's prepared to do a great job, rather than settle on doing an ok job that doesn't invite scrutiny.

4
SorosOrMuskPickOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kash wants us to believe that literally everyone is a lone wolf actor if it involves a high profile death or assassination attempt. Even Epstein supposedly killed himself according to him. This is nothing more than lazy investigation. Trump and Charlie deserve better.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›