1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo, they own the entire money system. They created it. Money would have to stop existing for them to need it.

Auction of seized goods.

3
Sugmadeek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why? Its a good question.

7
Sugmadeek 7 points ago +8 / -1

The price is fake and means nothing. You would know that if you werent a shill.

2
Sugmadeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

The khazars were called name stealers. All these body doubles, clones, people in masks, are them, remember that.

9
Sugmadeek 9 points ago +9 / -0

How crazy would it be if thats what that post meant lol

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have pictures and videos of blue objects surrounding by charred rubble. We have proof, you do not.

You keep claiming things as fact that you could not possibly know. The irony in your posts is so deep youre drowning in it.

2
Sugmadeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

What liberal shill down voted this?

12
Sugmadeek 12 points ago +12 / -0

Dont test, seriously stop testing. You only add to their bs news stats.

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow now i know youre a shill. Posting an msn article thats claims "its all been debunked!" as proof.

2
Sugmadeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does she look like Ron in drag?

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I always assumed that meant the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Lockhead video i linked you shows the systems equipped on a plane. A quick google search shows several results of these systems equipped on planes as well.

Whats available to the public is decades behind whats already been built. If you think that they were testing these systems 50+ years ago and couldnt figure it out by now youre crazy.

China has a system that can disable satellites from the ground. So why couldnt that work in reverse, from a satellite/satellites to the ground.

Elon has been sending thousands of satellites up. No one spends that kind of money just to use them for internet access.

There is no charade, this is how stuff is being leaked to the public. Slow and obvious. Full declass incoming.

2
Sugmadeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Going to need a lot of rope.

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

My comments werent directed toward you but you seemed to have taken offense to them.

And no known systems? You couldnt possibly know that. Stop pretending like you are in the know.

And secondly you are wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1toVupe_R8

They've been openly testing these weapons for at least a decade. So talk a step back and calm your wilful ignorance. You arent educating anyone here.

Heres another official example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMx1-yaRLyQ

I mean the irony of your patronizing posts here is comical at this point. I didnt have a problem with you or your posts directly until you stepped the arrogance levels to 10 and proved that you have no idea what youre talking about. Theyve been openly testing multiple systems for a decade that the public knows of and you still post drivel like that. Come on man.

2
Sugmadeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you knew that was going to happen and did nothing to stop it, doesnt that make you just and evil and sick and the perpetrators?

8
Sugmadeek 8 points ago +8 / -0

"I was just doing my job" should still equal executions. Im sorry but your ignorance still equals murder.

1
Sugmadeek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theres no knee jerk reaction here. Im simply discussing possibilities. Playing devils advocate. But when mods make a thread mocking its own members because of something like a dew i think it harms the entire community. We need to keep an open mind and discuss all possible outcomes. Discuss every point in both directions.

Im not saying this was caused by a dew but it could have been. Thats not really something we can know at this point. But im open to that possibility. More so after seeing the strike in michigan some 3 years ago that they tried to call a meteor.

But i think those quickly to dismiss such possibilities without giving it any time, are the problem. Close/small minded and naive in general.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›