24
ThatOtherOne 24 points ago +24 / -0

I would have said then why is it that I cannot sue you, or anyone for that matter, if you jab me and something happens to me as a result of that jab?

5
ThatOtherOne 5 points ago +5 / -0

A majority of the human race is functionally below average. Heck, Aristotle knew and wrote about this all the way back around 350 BC, noting that a society should be governed by the most intelligent and strong of society because the average person didn't have enough common sense to make major decisions affecting their or their nation's future.

We now have added proof that he was right.

5
ThatOtherOne 5 points ago +5 / -0

He did. He chose an experimental vaccine shot over his relationship with his son.

3
ThatOtherOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

A technically automated way to identify super-spreaders of a virus who can then be labeled as such and segregated by society.

1
ThatOtherOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Canuck here. The only Canadian Patriots are those that voted for the PPC. Any of my fellow Canadians that voted for the Cons, the Libs, the NDP or the Green Party are either pussies and/or terribly naïve, misguided, daft or obtuse.

11
ThatOtherOne 11 points ago +11 / -0

With any luck the UN itself will eventually find itself withdrawn, blown to smithereens and never to be seen or heard from again.

by BQnita
2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed. This is happening throughout the world. We all better hope that the US is capable of preventing what appears to be the inevitable.

2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, he's going from one corrupt agency to head-up another equally corrupt one. Canada is beyond fucked.

2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

But, will there be enough people that actually care enough for it to truly matter? Or, by the time all of these illegals are allowed to enter without incident, will it matter come voting time?

4
ThatOtherOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those who show up at DAVOS and Bilderberg each year are the ones in control of the world. Everyone else are merely their puppets.

2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is needed is a simple & concise explanation of the timing, complete with no-brainer evidence

6
ThatOtherOne 6 points ago +6 / -0

"I was just following the orders of ......"

7
ThatOtherOne 7 points ago +7 / -0

Now is the time to ask for a raise ......

1
ThatOtherOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

It sucks for it would penalize those who earn their money honestly.

It would not save our world since it would never be implementable, even if it made sense to do so.

Not to mention such a plan would depends on "valuations". Heck, it's an exercise in futility already to place a monetary value on things that are ostensibly easy to value. Try valuing things such as artwork, for example, located in a warehouse in another country.

You'd be very hard pressed to find a reason for a person that wealthy to continuously subject themselves to that process for the privilege of what.. possessing a certain Country's passport?

I mean, it would have to be a worldwide plan to even get off the ground. But the wealthy in question are mobile and already employ the best people to specifically find strategies to minimize wealth losses and maximize their wealth earnings. Such people would simply hide their wealth offshore.

Who would govern such a plan and how would corruption be accounted for in such a case?

If I though for another 10 minutes, could come up with a zillion other issues but, I can;t be bothered.

1
ThatOtherOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not disagreeing with your assertion that it is dangerous to have that much wealth in so few hands. I'm saying your "solution" of limiting the wealth of everyone to solve said problem, sucks.

1
ThatOtherOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why? Your solution penalizes those individuals who are able to create wealth naturally and not "artificially" as you suggest. It goes without saying that any precedent that allows for penalizing the good because of what the bad do is very bad stuff.

Instead, why not, for example, seek to remove the condition(s) that allow for people to become artificially wealthy?

1
ThatOtherOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a complicated solution no doubt. A solution for which I have no viable answer to offer up myself. But, limiting wealth as you suggest is not the answer.

2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed, allow pure capitalism ....... minus the crony part that currently proceeds it as witnessed throughout much of the entirety of today's world.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›