The reason viruses like smallpox were eradicated is because they don't have an animal reservoir, whereas coronaviruses do. The problem with scientific arguments is most people don't understand what they're talking about (including me, not trying to sound rude). I had to research to understand why small pox vaccines were effective, bc we literally eradicated it.
Similarly, this would be like treating all vehicles the same, but some vehicles are cars and others are boats. They're part of the same family since they're both vehicles, but they have distinct characteristics that make them operate differently.
This is essentially the information in question: https://nationaltriallaw.com/can-i-sue-the-army-navy-or-air-force/
In certain circumstances, one of which is medical negligence/malpractice, military members can sue via the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). If the military mandates and administers anything other than Comirnaty, they are in violation of the Nuremberg Code and are leaving themselves wide open for lawsuits.
This isn't entirely true: https://nationaltriallaw.com/can-i-sue-the-army-navy-or-air-force/
In certain circumstances, one of which is medical negligence/malpractice, military members can sue via the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
They will have vials of something, otherwise where is the fluid coming from? Clearly they won't have Comirnaty yet, as they've admitted it's not ready. At this time they will only be able to to inject the currently available EUA shot, and asking to see the vial is part of documenting and pointing out that they are giving the incorrect shot.
As far as Pfizer's shot not having approval, it unfortunately does but only under the name Comirnaty. All of the documents are available on the FDA's website. The bait and switch happening now is them trying to continue using the current shot as if it's the correct one with the approval.
That's interesting because how can they prove they gave you a vax and not saline? The vials would have to be nearby, even if in the trash. And if this is the case how was the batch number documented and kept with the shot being given? I'm going to ask around and see if this has been the case for others also.
They will most definitely have the vials. Based on the temperature requirements for the Pfizer shot, they'll have to methodically draw it out as they ensure members are ready to receive it. Regardless, the batch numbers are documented and can be matched to the shot given so even if for some strange reason they do have shots drawn, this info can be tracked.
Exactly. Cut and dry lawsuit if they document everything properly and not sign liability waivers.
What about the military that have no choice at all?
That's literally a survivability rate of 99.998%, which is the EXACT percentage we've known about for military aged individuals. So absurd.
Being sworn in as a result of fraudulence would most certainly nullify a make believe ceremony.
Similarly, if I married a woman only to find out later that she was already married, that would absolutely nullify that marriage certificate.
Fraudulence does not grant a free pass simply because you caught it later on.
Since this is uncharted territory, I'm curious if a new election would be held at all if enough states decertified. If they are mathematically proving that Biden didn't get the votes necessary to win a state, then those same results would mathematically prove that Trump DID have the votes necessary. Therefore, in my opinion they should award the state electors to Trump like they should have from the start. There should be no do-overs (my opinion).
I'm sure the answer would surprise you lol the silent majority for sure
This is one of the first times they've tried to organize something like this, so if you're interested stop in and show your support!
This is still my biggest concern with all of this. It seems wildly reckless to put all your eggs in one basket when it comes to our military. Jab them all? What is the game plan for when you compromise the health of our entire military, and potentially leave us unable to defend ourselves?
I pray there will be an alternative, exemption, or anything which grants them an opportunity to refuse.
Praying that your son and everyone else is given freedom to choose whether or not they get the shot. I've discussed with several people I know in the military to see about the possibility of medical or religious exemption for people who don't want the vaccine. Not sure what options they have..
PLEASE encourage all of your family and friends to do this! There is a very large amount of our military that do not want this shot to be mandated.
Yup, I read through the whole thing. He's screwed. She's got text message and AOL messaging proof, amongst plenty of eye witnesses. He better see the inside of a cell.
"They just keep saying it's my freedom or whatever"...yes, Don. This is it exactly.
I've sometimes hit the downvote button on accident so I'd like to believe this is the case, however there's no shortage of shills lurking here either.
This has been a concern of many people I know in the military that are concerned about being forced to take this experimental vaccine. Some are over halfway thru reaching retirement and now don't know what to do. They don't want to get out of the military because they love their job, and they certainly don't want to lose retirement benefits. They've sacrificed so much in order to have more security for themselves and their families...and now that's all in jeopardy. I feel this is a huge crossroads for how this will affect military members and their numbers (if people refuse and get out).
You sound like someone who couldn't make the cut and now whine about others who did.
Unrelated, but that's a lot of Reese's for a checkout lane.
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season."
This is the statement that is in question from the CDC's write-up. People are deducing that the PCR test that was used since the start of the pandemic must not meet this criteria of differentiating between the flu and Covid if labs are being encouraged to look for other approved alternatives. There has been a lot of criticism that the PCR testing was being incorrectly utilized to get the results that were wanted versus what was actually there (i.e. the number of cycles being used). This also brings into question why flu levels were nearly at zero. Was it the masks and social distancing, or was everything being chalked up as Covid since the PCR test wasn't accurate?
Personally I'd like the CDC to provide more insight on this decision because, as other posts are bringing to light, it's strange timing now that Soros and Gates are looking to profit from their recent investments in Covid testing methods.
Don't forget to mention the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, CDC at its classiest.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study