The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
You can bet it won't be Comirnaty because it won't be released until 2024.
It seems to be the one administered in Europe. I saw it myself on a friend's "vaccine passport".
They won’t have the vails. They will just have syringes drawn up ready to give.
They will most definitely have the vials. Based on the temperature requirements for the Pfizer shot, they'll have to methodically draw it out as they ensure members are ready to receive it. Regardless, the batch numbers are documented and can be matched to the shot given so even if for some strange reason they do have shots drawn, this info can be tracked.
When I got the Pfizer back in January, I never saw a vial. It was ready to go when I got there. In and out in a few minutes.
That's interesting because how can they prove they gave you a vax and not saline? The vials would have to be nearby, even if in the trash. And if this is the case how was the batch number documented and kept with the shot being given? I'm going to ask around and see if this has been the case for others also.
90% of people I know who have had the vax all had 'flue-like' symptoms after the jab, especially the 2nd. So it may not have been 'the vax', but it sure as hell wasn't saline!
I believe each vial contains multiple 'shots' so they fill up multiple syringes from one vial. This CDC page - https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/pfizer/pfizer-bioNTech-faqs.html suggests one vial contains 6 syringe loads.
If they gave me saline, I’m going to be fucking rich when I sue them after the Plan is revealed for injecting me with a different substance than the one I signed for on my paperwork
I'm not even sure I would sue for that, I would praise them for saving my life.
Oh wait, it's you.
It is me!
I thought I was talking to a fully sane individual, not halfway sane. I apologize.
Err, enjoy your Ovaltine and Soylent?
Wow. 8 months now. How are you morphing?
Sensitivity to light, pale skin, no heartbeat, need to consume hemoglobin to survive, general immortality but other than that, no side effects.
Nice! You are in a good place. We here are all immortal as well...so far One jab or two? I have wondered about the control group getting saline. How are they tracking that? Do they know who so they can do second saline/vax as required or is it just all willie nillie
It was Pfizer, so two.
And as I’ve said before, my medical documentation says I got a vaccine, not saline, and I never consented to the possibility of receiving anything else.
So if there is a Master Plan by the White Hats to inject me with something other than what’s on my paperwork, I hope they have deep pockets, because a lawsuit is coming as soon as they reveal that I got saline instead of what I legally signed for. It’s kind of a crime to inject someone with literally anything other than what they agreed to.
Well, you have a suit either way. Saline or not you didn't get a vaccine. At best a gene therapy prophylactic treatment.
Silly rabbit still thinks the normal rules apply. Informed consent has been completely flushed down the shitter and the EUA (aka no-can-sue) jab is the largest clinical trial in history, courtesy of the globocommie technocrat transhumanists. Why would they feel compelled to inform you if you're in the control group?
How do you expect to get paid in a lawsuit that, if you prevailed, would promptly inspire about 3 billion others to do the same? I don't think there's enough money on earth to cover that claim. Then again, if your goal is to destroy the global economy then usher in a new globocrypto controlled by the World Bank that can be easily deactivated any time a sheeple posts a mean tweet, then maybe your landmark lawsuit and the few billion others that follow will succeed in speeding us to that fate. Or maybe the massive class action will net you a sweet settlement check for $5.62 like all those Thalidomide babies who are living easy now.
Start thinking bigger and realize that unless you got an invite to Barry's raver a couple weeks ago, you're not on the "marked safe from chattel" list just like all us crazy Q tards. You may not think you're one of us now, but as Master Yoda said, "You will be".
They will have vials of something, otherwise where is the fluid coming from? Clearly they won't have Comirnaty yet, as they've admitted it's not ready. At this time they will only be able to to inject the currently available EUA shot, and asking to see the vial is part of documenting and pointing out that they are giving the incorrect shot.
As far as Pfizer's shot not having approval, it unfortunately does but only under the name Comirnaty. All of the documents are available on the FDA's website. The bait and switch happening now is them trying to continue using the current shot as if it's the correct one with the approval.
The military member won't see the vial. Those get filled in a different room. They do this will ALL mando vaccines administered.
The military member won't see the vial. Those get filled in a different room. They do this will ALL mando vaccines administered.
It’s just so cute that some of you still have faith in the legal system. I swear, no one who has ever made the “sue sue sue” comments have ever actually used the civil justice system.
It's actually a nuremburg code violation committed against military members...
Exactly. Cut and dry lawsuit if they document everything properly and not sign liability waivers.
Comirnaty = Moderna = Pfizer - It will maim and/or kill you.
This post is really misleading, and really should have a different title at least. (USA)
If it says COMIRNATY you can sue. It was FDA approved and has no legal immunity. BUT IT WILL NOT SAY COMIRNATY, because Comirnaty will not be legally available in the USA until 2024. They will literally bait-and-switch because the experimental Pfizer BioNTech is the same formula, it will satisfy 'vax' requirements, and it is currently available - that's what they'll provide to you.
If it does NOT say COMIRNATY, it:
A. Is experimental, not approved. B. Therefore cannot be mandated. C. Is IMMUNE from litigation. You CANNOT SUE for having participated in a 'vaccine' experiment. You can try to file a complaint with the International Criminal Court about a violation of the Nuremberg Code - some people have already attempted this with no results yet.
YOU WON'T GET COMIRNATY, you will get BioNTech and be unable to sue.
This is essentially the information in question: https://nationaltriallaw.com/can-i-sue-the-army-navy-or-air-force/
In certain circumstances, one of which is medical negligence/malpractice, military members can sue via the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). If the military mandates and administers anything other than Comirnaty, they are in violation of the Nuremberg Code and are leaving themselves wide open for lawsuits.
Sorry, bit it's written into the UCMJ that you can't sue the military or Fed Govt for anything that happens to you while on Active Duty. Even after you leave, you or your family still can't sue. If we were allowed to, we wouldn't have a military.
This isn't entirely true: https://nationaltriallaw.com/can-i-sue-the-army-navy-or-air-force/
In certain circumstances, one of which is medical negligence/malpractice, military members can sue via the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
Dr. Zelenko says Comirnaty is not being made yet and won't be available in the US until 2024.
Not military, but would go AWOL if forced to take it, and bring a ton of guns and ammo with me in the process "yep.. loading up for today's shooting range drills"
Or is this the way out of getting the shot? Just request the cominiarty.
How can they comply if they don’t have the vial that says Comirnaty ?
Only the Comirnaty vax allows you to sue. The bait and switch is the news that "the Pfizer vax is approved", but if you get the Pfizer EUA vax and have problems, you cannot sue, because it is EUA and Pfizer still has legal immunity. Only the Comirnaty vax has liability for Pfizer, but of course, there is no Comirnaty vax.
Military should ask what Pfizer shot is being used. Then tell the military to take a hike because it is NOT FDA approved. The military, government and media are lying in a round about way.
Chapter 8 in the Army's policy on immunizations covers emergency use authorization. I've been researching exemptions to help my grandson in the Army.
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:36be0d6a-6899-4b9a-ba3e-246dde1c64c3