2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny thing is, this ISN'T about nuclear war or WW3.

Preparations can be applied to many crisis, as they are general and not nuke-specific(not a lot people can do that in a way that is nuke specific anyway).

Now what else could those 'emergency preps' be relevant for?

How about a civil-war like situation that is likely to occur when Swedish military start operations to forcibly evict muslim extremist and muslims in general, rather many muslims in Sweden preparing for this and the Swedish military have also been preparing for this(although it isn't officially admitted or mentioned as such except in highly classified and compartmentalized paperwork or verbally between higher command.

This is a part/Swedish branch(other countries as well...) of the plan, and as stated by Q, "not everything will be clean"....

3
ThomasMaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scare event...........

Don't get me wrong, this will likely include at least one nuke going of, but if I'm right it will go of in the ocean and with little to no casualties, which will be a very strong indication that is a part of the show/plan....

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have heard some stuff about O*Keefe being the integrity problem and not the rest of Project Veritas(generally when something is presented too loudly and one-sided I tend to get suspicious....)

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

So basically the same as FEMA then, a dumping ground for all the ones they can't retire or kill because it would be too problematic or they could prove useful but that are to troublesome to have anywhere important.....

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the people pushing themselves for a position are likely DS assets trying to control the narrative(DS wishful thinking...), have been a lot of those(it just started with Flynn....)

6
ThomasMaker 6 points ago +6 / -0

Having a feeling that the ones that will prove to be the most pivotal(in ways most people won't expect) are deliberately left out/left to the last minute.

Department of Treasury

Department of Agriculture

Department of Commerce

Department of Labor

Department of Transportation

Department of Energy

4
ThomasMaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Obviously, it's an even greater waste of resources than the FBI......

But on the other hand if it is a bit down on the list, putting Herrera in as it's director until it is dismantled and just for the kek's would be epic..........(fun is where you make it and who's says the cleanup can't have some funny in it...)

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

He should ban the downright toxic stuff but he should also make an ingredient list that can only be put in food with a detailed and prominent display of side effects on the packaging...

Have a feeling that will nix most of the ones he doesn't ban, be it because manufacturers don't want to risk it or because people don't want to buy it...

3
ThomasMaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Noticed that Boltons profile pic is a 'one eye' one....

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Small point about some of these(and the ones to come).

More than one are likely to be firmly leashed rather than an actual whitehat, some are likely to be firmly verifiable as DS and illuminati,

Good chance some of them will be exposed and replaced and it is most likely to be the obvious ones(Tulsi...) unless they prove to be very reliably useful on a leash

The ones the least likely to be leashed or exposed and lasting appointments are the 'who is this person?' ones, Wiles is in this category, Hegseth might be as well but he is high-profile and have demonstrated seriously bad judgement(the axe-throwing incident...) so having been in the shit(combat) on numerous occasions may not be quite as salient of an indication of intent as one might hope(time will tell).

Also likely that some on a leash will get positions where they can do little harm because of their usefulness outside of their appointed station more than their use in that position(EPA isn't exactly a department I would bet money on still being around 4 years from now...).

Obvious people are obvious, good chance many of them are placed because of that...

edit: a few appointments may also be deliberate wrecking-balls for the purpose of imploding/wrecking......

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately I see numbers six morphing into what we already have now, only worse....

(the kid successfully defending him/herself getting expelled together with their attacker, who now holds a grudge and is now no longer restrained by being in a school......)

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should look into it, there are rather a lot of pictures of Trump doing it and the first few generations of people he has pointed at in a photo-op have all proven to be bad-actors/DS..

Just one of those clues he likes to leave for people(mentioning central-casting, air-Q's and many more)

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was just the first I found but if people are motivated to ignore 90% because of the remaining 10% that is entirely up to them...

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's out there but just of-the-bat both snopes and politifact have written 'fact-checks' on most of this reporting it as 'false' and that alone is fairly good indication of the opposite being true(or they wouldn't have bothered to 'fact-check' it to begin with....)

A few pictures:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRGF9HrW0AE0jEg?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GcGR4FHa8AAfO5-?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GE9CuzyWsAA-VGf?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHrxUDeXIAAgag7?format=jpg&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GE9X3KnWEAAljd5?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

wonder why she backed down from this one.... https://eu.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2024/03/12/kari-lakes-silence-on-mark-lambs-call-for-debates-speaks-volumes/72946141007/

more to be found, but for some strange reason it is fairly buried......

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will likely prove to be the first domino...

(wouldn't bet money against Hungary being the first to drop out after this....)

4
ThomasMaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump gave Kari Lake 'the finger/point', and by now we all know what that means....

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GcGEMzbW8AA_084?format=jpg&name=240x240

Remember back in May 2024 when Trump had his campaign fundraiser event? He invited everyone except Kari Lake. There is a reason for that...

Do you actually think Trump forgot about all those things Kari Lake said about him in the past?

Do you remember when she called for amnesty for illegal immigrants?

Do you remember her supporting a campaign to protest D. Trump inauguration back in Jan 2017?

Do you remember Kari Lake making fun of Donald Trump weight and that he was corrupt?

Do you remember when Kari Lake said she would rather vote for Joe Biden than D. Trump?

Do you remember her being caught trying to elicit illegal campaign donations?

Do you remember her having Drag Queens perform at her house in front of her children?

Trump plays the long game. Kari Lake was/is not popular in "The MAGA Movement". 2/3 of people do not like her. She is like a political Tammy Faye.

There is a LOT of liberals around D. Trump masquerading as conservative.

6
ThomasMaker 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a hunch that suicide weekend will happen in Hollywood.

(think about it, the kind of personalities/psychology and what they are facing....)

3
ThomasMaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

People tend to confuse aggressive with angry and what you just described is someone with a HIGHLY aggressive personality, someone that never relents, keep pushing and that always go for the jugular......

I fucking LOVE people like this and the world needs more of them.....

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will just start eating toothpaste......

1
ThomasMaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thing is, giving someone several chances isn't the same as trusting someone so I wouldn't so much describe him as a 'soft touch' as I would say that he seems to be an actual good person(That soul was Patton, soft is not the right word, at all...)

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kinda petered out on the whole 'benefit of doubt' thing tbh...

From a purely 'practical' standpoint, I'd rather be surprised about someone being good than be surprised about someone being bad, it saves time and limits damage.....

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

No clue but it was the gilded turd that got me........

(also happens to be true so would be funny if someone around DC could check it out/verify)

2
ThomasMaker 2 points ago +5 / -3

Michael Flynn didn't donate anything to Donald Trump.

Michael Flynn told Donald Trump supporters that the election was too rigged to vote...........

Michael Flynn didn't didn't register any mid or high voter turn out for Donald Trump.

Michael Flynn said on Alex Jones show in 2023 that he didn't care for another Donald Trump administration.

Michael Flynn went around the country telling people that Donald Trump could be assassinated.

Michael Flynn was telling everyone that don't expect anything from the GOP.

Michael Flynn was not invited to any of the rallies.....................

Michael Flynn & Roger Stone went on Alex Jones trying to establish a Coalition government that did not include Donald Trump.

You can't get a pardon for doing nothing.

A innocent GENERAL that did nothing wrong would fight to death to get his name cleared over accepting a pardon....

Flynn has zero shame, he is a grifter and a paytriot....

He breathes and the air come out crooked.......

edit: Kinda loving the fan-boy downvotes(lot of people here will have it just as rough as the normies when the dam breaks....)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›