Remember Epstein was a hedge fund guy, he worked for mossad.
And before that he was a school teacher. The bad guys lift their good little employees into positions of wealth and power so they have someone else's face taking blame when they get caught. And their power is immense, he was epsteined because that was his second time getting caught - he had already been previously convicted but the system is so corrupt he was allowed to get right back to it.
Remember the preplanned "exercise" about a SARS sequel pandemic conducted in New York in October 2019? Remember both Gates and fauci and probably others promising Trump would have a pandemic during his term years before the bioweapon was used?
It wasn't just a weapon that leaked, it was planned and scheduled and that exercise is just more proof.
Fauci has promised to release another weapon as well, and since he funded the lab that developed Covid and delivered on his promise to release it during Trump's first term, I think he fully intends to deliver on the threat of releasing another one. I wonder when gates has it scheduled and if he will tip us off with another exercise?
This is the crux of that federal judge trying to block executive orders too - there is literally no legal stipulation of any federal court having that agency, that judge can only represent his district. So if that had been allowed to stand, every judge in America all the way down to a single person randomly deciding they are the judge of an abandoned old west ghost town would have more power than the entire Executive branch.
Law is only used against the common good. Rarely for. I think that mostly goes to the character of those who use law as a weapon. that federal judge knew better yet he continued to not only try and usurp Executive power, but when stopped by his own superiors in the Judicial he actually tried to overrule them as well. I think that means he's under coercive orders and terrified of his Epstein videos being made public if he doesn't act as their idiot tool.
I also remember that the genome contained some obvious markers used in genetic modification, though that information was as aggressively censored from media as the AP was aggressively suppressing the truth about it in OP's link.
The guilty have a lot of money at their disposal, but the truth itself shines brighter than an unlimited wealth of lies.
SARS was likely a bioweapon as well. Covid is the only the second virus ever found in the SARS genome... contrast that to every other virus where nature demonstrates thousands if not uncountable trillions of variations for things like "the common cold." There were also rumors of a lab leak in Canada, linked to spies from China (I wonder if they had ties to the Wuhan lab Fauci was funding?)
It was incredibly weird that SARS was completely unique. It was even weirder that Gates predicted a second form of SARS would become a world wide pandemic and believed it so much he plotted a practice drill just a few months before the weapon was released. Its weirder still that Fauci publicly threatened SARS would be a threat to Trump's presidency years before the weapon was used. All of them predicting a brand new, obscure genetic variation of a virus that had only been seen once, been found to be treated successfully by things like ivermectin, and had completely disappeared... would somehow not only have a genetically related but also completely unique new version created in a lab and released exactly on schedule as they predicted and planned for in advance. How extremely weird and coincidental! Weirder and more coincidental that multiple companies - including Moderna who had literally never come up with any sort of product before! - came up with a "vaccine" in supposedly one day of work, yet somehow haven't been able to do that for every single virus known to mankind and virtually cure the world of everything from coughs to rabies - you would think that would be much easier because every other virus has been researched around the globe for a century rather than a day. And weird yet again that Gates was extremely vocal about the genetic modification shots as soon as they were being mandated (with all kinds of legal protections, and no kind of informed consent) considering he had previously stated "vaccines" would be used to reduce the global population.
Wait thats not really weird or coincidental if its a known bioweapon, these people had advanced knowledge of a weapon that was going to be used on the general population and appear to have had a direct line to those who used it on us because they had accurate timelines as well as knowledge of the genetic research of the specific weapon while it was still being developed. Thats Terrorists making threats and following up on them with murderous intention.
As Elon called it many years back when Democrats loved him: "Shortseller Enrichment Commission"
He kept insulting the SEC too - so much they took him to court where the judge had to tell the SEC to "put their reasonableness pants on" officially on the public record because they wanted to punish Elon so hard they actually demanded Tesla commit securities fraud for them. This was around the same time the SEC was committing perjury in their suit to try and shut down crypto in the Ripple case (which they eventually lost - thankfully because when an agency has to commit crimes to even levy its case they shouldn't be permitted to win) which shows the corrupt have a criminal hatred of that too for whatever reason. IMO - and I think Musk should point this out and push for it publicly - the absolute best way to use crypto technology is as a voter recognition schema. Crypto is both public in that everyone on the planet can audit transactions and see exactly how many transactions or votes are being amde in real time, forever backward viewable and no month long recounting processes that appear to be utilized to manufacture needed votes long after the election should have been decided. And private in that individual user "wallets" (accounts basically) are private. Someone can see a wallet voted for X candidate, but they can't see who that person is. The vote itself can be audited but the person remains anonymous (except to themself - so you can view and verify that your vote counted and was not flipped later)
Prosecution just needs a felony conviction - not even time served or fines, just that felony record. Then the Democrat party loses another voter (at least, a legal actual voter... their vote results aren't exactly limited to just actual legal voters)
MS13 may have killed them directly since they screwed up the murder and Rich was healthy enough to walk into the ambulance smiling and talking. he had to be killed later in the Hospital, so those MS13 hitmen might have been executed for their incompetence.
The SEC is the biggest, most corrupt example of this. They literally do nothing to stop crime and simply serve as a barrier to smaller firms before they become a threat to big money. Congress has never been arrested for insider trading, big banks get convicted for felonies - even as bad as actual knowingly working to launder money for cartels which would under any RICO ACT prosecution make them actually guilty of murder etc - and yet the SEC only ever punishes large financial institutions a fraction of the profits. Not even fining them enough to discourage the crime itself again - just reducing profit margins slightly. And when those institutions were publicly exposed illegally shorting over 200% (probably way over, but the regulatory agency official numbers showed 226% so proof of systemic crime is on their own public record) literally no one was investigated let alone charged with naked shorting. Instead, the SEC and even Congress redirected their inquiries towards safe legal topic like "gamification" with intent to try and make it harder for retail investors to catch them in the act again.
And SEC employees are well rewarded for their complicity. The last SEC Chairman was worth 9 figures, previously ran Hillary's Presidential campaign, and infamously deregulated the laws that would have made another Great Depression impossible to replicate (as well as 2008, and the financial collapse in progress that's already larger than 2008 even though they aren't even discussing it like a collapse). Regular low level SEC employees constantly take high paying jobs at Wall Street financial firms, the revolving door corruption and back scratching reward system is obvious and a conflict of interest by design.
SEC can be safely dissolved with no negative outcomes. The FBI actually proved this several times - the first big example was when the SEC had enough evidence to arrest Bernie Madoff for a decade, but instead chose to endorse him (and increase his victim pool substantially, helping him commit even larger scale crimes). They literally never took action against Madoff - his own children were advised to take their testimony to the FBI who arrested Madoff immediately without any SEC input. The FBI actually had less evidence than the SEC had for a decade when Madoff was arrested by them. More recently a few years ago the FBI decided to go after Anson Funds for illegal trading. They investigated, made arrests, fined the company more than it was worth, and Anson Funds was destroyed by its crime all in a year. The SEC still to this day had no part of that either, and historically if they had they would only have years of "investigating" doing nothing, with possibly eventually a wrist slap fine with legal indemnity stating "the fine is not an admission of guilt" because thats how they fake-punish every wall street firm worth enough to pay their bribes.
And that was the FBI proving the SEC is unnecessary! The FBI itself is a corrupt organization, most recently in the news exposed for helping high profile politically well connected MS13 gang members continue human trafficking without any police interference, even as local police were trying to stop the criminal and free his victims.
When a well documented criminal agency can prove it does another agency's job better than the agency tasked with doing a job, the agency can be safely eliminated with no worry.
As you should. I have the same misgivings - I see why they made that decision, and I see why they could have mede the other decision. I think they chose keeping Protected Class valid as the longer term legal priority, but there are risks of abuse here that will have repercussions.
Panic and accept. Its like when they see a shooting and want to push gun control (because a disarmed population is a lot easier to oppress) they have had the arrogance to put up "score board" graphics trying to entice future shooters to kill even more. Its not accidental, its coordinated propaganda. Evil!
That whole episode is absurd isn't it? They refused to disclose what company they shorted, but it got out. And even if they had shorted it 100% - literally every share - they would have been fine. Expensive, sure, billions in losses... but they were one of the worlds largest banks. But no, they leaked over 200% reported shorting - still miniscule to those holding trillions in assets - before adjusting that number down to what? 60%? 20%? and somehow they still collapse under the weight of that debt. Debt they pay something like 0.1% interest against to maintain forever. Debt simply owed on illegally counterfeited shares they made trying to destroy a successful company with enough money to pay off that supposed short debt... if that was real data and not completely made up. The smaller company shouldn't be more wealthy than those holding trillions in assets.
But no, they short companies so hard that a company simply doing well collapses them because its value - tiny though it is against major banks managing trillions in assets - is somehow a threat to the entire financial system. Thats how badl the criminal shorting practice has become. And why they actually spent years repealing the legal blocks taht protected us from the Great Deperssion happening again. Gensler deregulated Glass Steagall so that he and his cronies would be able to profit on a Depression and close out shorts when whole industries collapse from the economic turmoil. They have een openly said their shorts will be foisted on retirement and pension accounts because thats what they do when they get caught committing crimes. Shorting is at its core pure evil.
They were diagnosing everything as covid deaths for the numbers. Accidents, heart disease, you name it. And I think youre right those TV numbers probably weren't even based on faked cause of deaths, just completely made up. If we just go by voter numbers (which is valid as older people - the most vulnerable to dying) Trumps 2020 and 2024 votes are steady. he didn't lose 7 million. Democrat numbers fell by millions though.... if those were deaths its quite a statistical significant data point that covid killed only Democrat voters.
Same reason car accidents and heart attacks caused covid deaths. Fear numbers. Be afraid, and get your genetic alteration shots! Don't ask whats in them though, or any of that usual "informed consent" legal mumbo jumbo. If you question, you're going to the camps!
Fed shouldn't be lowering rates - they're too low already. What we need to do is raise them to help normal people and fight back inflation, rather than bailing out the banks even harder. Let them continue to collapse - they already collapsed bigger than all of the 2008 financial disaster over teh last few years and media is keeping quiet about how badly those banks need bailing out. Lower rates will just restart the housing bubble and resume the 2008 collapse's pause that is clearly not over. Rates right now are simply where they were before the bailouts - these are rates for a normal economy with no worries about inflation. Lowering rates increases inflation that hurts everyone. The bailout rates only exist to keep banks who have no intention of functioning on their own forever on life support, to the detriment of everyone but the most wealthy.
Switzerland's biggest bank is next to collapse. They're actually trying to be exempted from the swaps they inherited from Credit Suisse's collapse because they shorted American companies so much it destroyed them... and their short positions will never get any better. They're doomed and begging to just not pay their debts to American shareholders. And they aren't alone. Shorting should just be illegal, execute short sellers like South Korea as treasonous criminals trying to destroy companies for profit. If a company is going to fail it will, they don't need to organize and execute a takedown to make that happen... or profit more than the company's value on it. Thats an unsustainable business model that necessitates recessions and depressions because inevitably they will fail to bring a company down and that company's growth will destroy them. Shorting is an incentive to create economic disasters intentionally.
It could be used that way, but from a purely legal perspective one shouldn't be able to just decide to be a protected class at any time, and change that whenever. From a legal slippery slope perspective, precedent is set that one can't decide to be another race, nationality, ethnicity, or gender, old, young, handicapped, or even a citizen simply because they decide to identify as such one day. Protected classes are a legal structure that could be abused if this went the other way. Going the other way would have probably ended protected classes eventually - this decision's was going to create precedent with repercussions no matter what.
It also implicates the FBI (and therefore federal government emploees are suspect across all agencies) actively engaged in promoting human trafficking and cooperating with international organized crime.
Which therefore makes it prudent and appropriate to conduct a thorough investigation into all federal employees involved in crime.
He will probably win the lottery later when things have settled down. That or a string of lucrative book deals, maybe speaking fees, possibly start a private political organization (though USAID funding halts seem to have coincided with a number of those going insolvent suddenly, how interesting)