2
TrueTemper 2 points ago +2 / -0

No question about it, they changed the test standards to drive down the counts. That's absolutely true, and the timing was purposeful. However, the administration still wants to subject everyone for longer... hence they are announcing months more suffering and mask wearing. The Johns Hopkins doctor's opinion makes sense. We are nearing the point where so many have been (known or not) previously exposed, or have been vaccinated, that herd immunity will be quite strong. Mitigation has been a colossal failure, and there will be NO justification for ANY further mitigating actions within 2 months.

18
TrueTemper 18 points ago +18 / -0

Modern Day Dr. Mengele. Changed his position on virtually everything whenever he needed to to maximize damage. He should go down in history as the new Angel of Death.

3
TrueTemper 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Trump realizes that unless elections are taken back, the whole thing is moot... they have shown they can overcome hundreds of thousands of vote deficiencies. Therefore, I think he will work on pushing the R legislatures in these states to pass election laws that restore elections and reduce or eliminate the steal potential.

3
TrueTemper 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think we need to add to the resources here. I know the board is Q related, but resources related to combating the disinformation that has been spread during the pandemic would be useful.

The truth is that the only actual scientific study that has been done showed masks do absolutely nothing.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/18/major-study-finds-masks-dont-reduce-covid-19-infection-rates/

Furthermore, the observable data and evidence of infection rates indicates that no mitigation measures of any kind have had ANY impact on reducing infections, rates or mortality. In other words, had "nothing" been done... nothing would be different, other than less economic impact and likely quicker achievement of herd immunity (which is already here, and will be certainly here within a month or two) https://www.wsj.com/articles/well-have-herd-immunity-by-april-11613669731

5
TrueTemper 5 points ago +5 / -0

These are going to occur naturally. They know it. If they cannot find another way to destroy Trump by 2024, they know it is over. Because you know he is going to put his entire operation toward fortifying congress with actual MAGA patriots, eliminating compromises rinos, and most importantly, getting republican legislatures in swing states to enact voter fraud legislation to take elections back.

5
TrueTemper 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's funny how bad all of these Q shows are... all working to re-characterize it around the most fringe concepts with no context, and all so inaccurate. Clearly they aren't trying to explain it. It's a pure coordinated disinfo op.

5
TrueTemper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey bud.... are you aware of which party holds the current majority in both houses of congress? Along with who decides which bills come to the floor?

They can do nothing other than make noise. The senate can filibuster still.

Any real action or reforms must happen at the state level right now. Hopefully this changes soon.

17
TrueTemper 17 points ago +17 / -0

Because they know that a majority knows the election was no legitimate. They know we know. Many things raised by Q are a massive threat to them. They must continue to discredit at all costs.

It's also why they can't have even the most basic public appearance.

9
TrueTemper 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Republicans introduce bill that will never see the floor" how is that a death blow?

Election fraud is a very serious issue, even moreso now that elections have been stolen from us. We need real solutions and actions to fix this. Congress has no power or ability to do anything at the federal level.

States with R legislatures MUST be compelled into action. States control their own election laws. FL will lead the way, others must follow!

-1
TrueTemper -1 points ago +1 / -2

I fail to see the "hope" here. The hope is that the legislature can change laws? The uniparty with D majority has been "legislating" through the courts and activist judges for some time. Now that they have majorities and have stolen the executive branch, they may not even need to.

The Supreme Court is on paper "6-3" - in practice, accounting for owned/controlled Chief Justice, 5-4 - and still refused to even hear a single case on the greatest travesty of our democracy in at least 100 years.

This article is certainly "true" in the sense that the facts as stated are correct, but it is also "irrelevant" in today's situation.

The top focus of everyone here must be taking personal responsibility and doing everything you can to get elections back. Without restoring elections, you won't be picking these legislators to magically restore the republic...

2
TrueTemper 2 points ago +2 / -0

This should be a primary topic of discussion. How do we get elections back? They are gone. They've been taken away. No one has any voice anymore.

How do we get them back? In these states that have R majorities in the legislature, what bills need to be put forward to get elections back?

DeSantis and FL are leading the way. They have already done a great job in reducing fraud (used to be rampant in FL), but they are taking additional measures. These should be looked at and copied in other states.

43
TrueTemper 43 points ago +43 / -0

Looks like Thomas and Alito both wrote their own dissents, and Gorsuch joined Alito's dissent. Which means Kavanaugh and Barrett both sided with the majority decision.

18
TrueTemper 18 points ago +18 / -0

Of course they were not going to have the courage. Too many are compromised, starting with the Chief Justice.

If we don't get elections back, this whole thing is going to get a lot worse.

3
TrueTemper 3 points ago +3 / -0

All it had to do was slow down in the last phase and land. It's not like a Harrier jet. After the entry phase, heat shield, and parachute deployment, the entry vehicle had to fire rockets to slow down to a stationary position, after which point it drops the actual rover by cable, then charges blow the cables and the thing crashes. All in much lighter gravity. They've done it the same way a bunch of times now. It's actually a pretty crude method and doesn't seem that difficult to me. It's not the same as a VTOL craft using rockets to take off and land all the time.

by BQnita
15
TrueTemper 15 points ago +15 / -0

Of course, this makes total sense. #science

Meanwhile, in the US we will debate whether it is proper to wear 3 or 4 masks into 2022. Whatever Dr. Mengele says this month must be correct.

9
TrueTemper 9 points ago +10 / -1

Love Kansas, and he is right of course, except for the part of sending fewer soldiers overseas. They have been starving for four years, and they will be taking this country back to war in a huge way. Already back in Syria, but my expectation is something much bigger is in the works.

9
TrueTemper 9 points ago +9 / -0

She never had the support of Republicans. She is an establishment swamp creature appointed to her position by people her family had supported financially. Her intention being (like all of them) to exploit her position for personal gain.

Who cares what she has to say? None of these people, Nikki Haley, Mitch McConnell, Romney, Murkowski et al - none of them have any constituency anymore. They ALL need to be replaced as soon as possible.

1
TrueTemper 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only way out of this for many will be to find the courage to resist the lockdown measures and their associated costs and economic impacts. Decide enough is enough, and take different actions. Wait too long, and many will not have the chance.

7
TrueTemper 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you are 65+ and think it helps you? Up to you. Roll the dice if you want. If you have some sort of chronic respiratory condition? Again, up to you.

This is a "vaccine" that is not a vaccine by any traditional definition. To inoculate people from a type of virus that has never been treated with a vaccine, nor does it make any sense to do so. Using a method and delivery mechanism that is entirely new.

For anyone younger that does not have a chronic condition, it seems insane to me to consider it.

14
TrueTemper 14 points ago +16 / -2

Probably a valid test site. The Mars mission is legit. They've sent quite a few rovers now. What were Spirit and Opportunity, 2003 or 2004?

I'm not sure what about the mission is so unbelievable.... should fall well within the limits of what we expect our species can accomplish.

4
TrueTemper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wanted to share an analogy I've used when challenged by someone that wants you to prove to them that everything they believe from their trusted sources is actually incorrect in one conversation. Obviously, this cannot be done. You can't undo years of programming and indoctrination, and people will not and cannot accept that the "news" sources they trust are nearly 100% fake. It's a waste of your time and everyone's time. The best you can do is ask the right question, and hope to trigger some cognitive dissonance that might lead someone to at least consider looking deeper into something themselves.

When you encounter someone who wants to use as "proof" that you are incorrect that you cannot definitively refute their views, since they are backed up by their own worthless sources and consistent with MSM indoctrination, you can give them the "Fat person analogy" - nothing against fat people, just a way of looking at and explaining why they won't be able to get a new direction from you in one conversation. This is for the person who wants you to prove something to them, right then and there, that what you say is correct... meanwhile they are looking for any reason to discount what you said.

If you have a person that eats poorly, makes terrible dietary decisions, and has put on tons of weight over the years... you can't just send a dietician over to speak with them and expect everything to be fixed right away. There are potentially years and years of damage that needs to be undone. Not only would they have to start making different choices, they would need to know what choices to make before even taking their first new action. Beyond that, they would need to decide whether they even WANT to make a change. The exact same thing is true for those indoctrinated on fake news and MSM sources. You can be up against a lifetime of indoctrination, and would be undercutting someone's entire worldview. People cannot and will not react well to that.

In most cases, people aren't ready to learn the truth, nor do they even WANT to know... for many different reasons. When you find someone who MIGHT be open and interested in the truth, but is unconvinced because you can't give them a good enough reason in 90 seconds... or maybe they already know better than you because they watch CNN and read NY Times posts on twitter ever morning... remember this analogy. Ask the right question, trigger cognitive dissonance... maybe they are smart enough to want to learn more for themselves. Verbal persuasion will fail 99% of the time.

3
TrueTemper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Twitter made the decision to no longer be a "platform" of record and the forum for "breaking news" when they banned Trump. now they target anyone outside of the narrative. Let Twitter die! Stop logging in. Let the blue checkmarks bark at each other. It is their echo chamber now. They can't even talk to us anymore if we don't allow it.

5
TrueTemper 5 points ago +5 / -0

How is what they did not obstruction of justice? The decision making itself may be criminal, too, but how is the cover up not an immediate investigation?

Also, since nearly the entire government is corrupt, and the US Attorneys in NY will be appointed or controlled by the totally corrupt Biden DOJ, what actions can be brought by affected parties? It seems ripe for a class action by all of those who's elderly family members were sentenced to their deaths by the politically motivated actions of Cuomo.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›