Call me skeptical, but don't you think Trump's inauguration in 2017 was due to his election in 2016?
Those seem connected.
Same thing with Brexit. Also due to a 2016 vote. 2016 seems the more important year.
Also what about the list of giant events that occurred in years with no eclipse.
I bet that would be impressive too.
Are the normies the ones indulging in this fear though?
Yes coincidences.
What is this website?
Do they just rip off other sites?
The post Ex-Officials Urge Curbing Presidential Power to Deploy Troops on U.S. Soil appeared first on New York Times.
The post Eclipse Likely a Dud Across Most of U.S. Path; Spectacular in Spots appeared first on Breitbart.
The post The odds of a US recession in the near year have dropped to a 2-year low appeared first on Business Insider.
I don't know what you are talking about about but don't stare at the eclipse
Even with sunglasses..
Here's more info
Here's more info
No.
Tug boats got it sorted out and the ship is heading to Norfolk, VA.
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-73.6/centery:39.5/zoom:7
Ship is currently in the the Atlantic. Closer to Atlantic City thatln NYC
The prosecutor’s entire argument, parroted by the judge, consists of mere assertion, without any evidence standards, because the government can’t prove the charges — they can only keep repeating their claims over and over.
Isn't this how indictments work
The trial is when you prove things.
The grand jury returned an Indictment. There will be a trial. The judge can't dismiss the Indictment.
Like Jack Kennedy his first name is John.
https://www.justice.gov/media/1260551/dl
http://lemondejuridique.com/actualites/john-luman-smith-united-states-department-of-justice/
the “disturbing” collusion extended beyond Biden’s in-house lawyers and involved multiple government agencies dating back to January 2021. Those agencies include the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the National Security Council, the FBI’s Counterintelligence division, the intelligence community, the Secret Service, and the Department of Ener
How is this explosive information? This has all been obvious since last June. All this info is in the indictment. The documents came from various agencies. You would have to go back to those agencies to see if the document was still classified. They are going to be witnesses in this case
Of course the Nation Archives is involved. They should be. They were the one who discovered classified documents were at Mar a Lago.
The National Archivist is not political position and it was the same Archivist who served under Trump when this all started.
The FBI is part of the DOJ. The FBi has always been involved in this case.
We know why the department of energy is involved. It's in the indictment. Without looking it up I think it's charge 19......the documents that requires Q clearance.
Because three objects are involved?
I don't think that is true.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511
Federal law allows one party consent as does Georgia. If you are in Georgia you are not under the jurisdiction of Maryland.
There was a 4.0 Aftershock around 6 pm, I missed it entirely
Only if you are in Maryland when you make the recording.
Federal law only requires one party.
GA law only requires one party.
So a person in GA can record a GA to Maryland call.
So there's a website called recordinglaw.com that I just looked at.
Interstate calls are one party calls and
Additionally, when you are recording a phone call between two states, it is best practice to follow the laws in which the recording device is located.
So she didn't commit felony wiretapping in Maryland unless she was actually in Maryland.
Less people are getting hospitalized.
Covid-19 hospitalizations in the US are at 1.1 per 100k as of 23 March which would be their lowest point in more than 4 years, since 14 March 2020.
This story works if you can throw a stone 7 miles. Because Bedminister is about 7 miles away.
I keep asking that is this just incompetence, because this company that doesn't actually specialize in this sort of work or is unfamiliar with the NY processes?
But they as I looked more into it, it seems like it must have been deliberate. Or at least it's just weird. Especially the two companies thing.
The company is also basically saying despite not be registered to do this stuff with NY courts, they are able to operate in NY through what seems to be a loophole that they issue bonds through an association in NY. See below.
But wouldn't you want to nail this down before telling a court you are good for $175 million? Because my understanding is they are now on the hook and they get rejected they are on the hook until another bond is approved.
The law requires an insurance company posting a surety bond to be authorized in New York," he said. "And there are serious questions about if this bond was properly posted."
Under a New York law known as CPLR 2502, an "insurance company [shall be] authorized to execute the undertaking within the state."
When CBS News asked Hankey about Knight Specialty's authorization to issue bonds in New York, the company's net worth and potential deficiencies in the bond filing for Trump, he deferred to Knight's president: "I'm chairman of that company. I've got several other companies that I own. Amit Shah would be the person to talk to."
Shah explained that the company is authorized to issue a surety bond in New York through the Excess Line Association of New York (ELANY). He said the company is approved by ELANY to issue bonds from its home domicile state of Delaware, where it is allowed to write surety bonds. "Our position is we're compliant," said Shah.
Knight's compliance officer, Mike Pepitone, said that there are a number of insurance companies that do not hold a license in every state, but a company is able to write a bond in other states where they are not licensed on what he said is called "an excess and surplus lines basis."
Nah, I didn't see any of that. My home office is my back room with stuff on shelves 9 feet high and I wasn't even worried about stuff falling off.
Even in NJ that didn't happen. Some videos here
https://www.wyff4.com/article/earthquake-videos-new-york-city-area/60411727
on a work meeting. someone in Boston didn't feel it, but the north coast of Mass did.
So I read the op-ed that explains this legal theory.......and it's just a theory.
I'm skeptical for a number of reasons.
- The PITC documents they seek, seem to be about electronic records and keeping them out of the hands of hackers.
In October 2014, Russian hackers breached the Executive Office of the President’s (EOP) network. Months later, President Barack Obama created, via executive action, the Presidential Information Technology Committee (PITC), purportedly to protect EOP information by moving systems onto Department of Defense (DOD) servers.
The Mar a Lago documents were all paper records.
- The Memo they point to explicitly says
This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law
which means it's not changing anything about the laws involved in the mar a lago case.
- They claim that this law is different for federal records vs presidential records. And that seems a big stretch.
The witness tampering statute’s language places liability on whoever “corruptly” “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.”
- They claim there's somehow a Brady violation. This doesn't make sense because again we are dealing with PAPER records. The list of documents and evidence have been turned over to Trump.
Tesla's cybertruck would have a copyright?
What parts? The software UI? I have heard this happen with music before, but not a truck.
wow that's crazy.
Based on what I felt in NY which is the strongest of the two earthquakes I ever felt, I'm surprised Boston felt it.
Lasted maybe 10-15 seconds here and I definitely felt like the floor was moving back and forth under me. Wasn't violent. but like swaying.
Yes. There have been.
If I remember correctly, they people counting
"sealed Indictments" changed it to counting "sealed cases.". This is because they don't know how many of these are actually Indictments. They have no way of knowing based on how they are counting.
Lots of types of court documents are sealed.