4
WinningAnyway 4 points ago +4 / -0

No matter what one might believe there's no way to arrest that many important people and the entire world not find out within a few minutes.

3
WinningAnyway 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now... that's real research, a grant for that man, forthwith, Jenkins!

1
WinningAnyway 1 point ago +1 / -0

More ''coordinated'' isn't it...

4
WinningAnyway 4 points ago +4 / -0

On June 30, with six Justices concurring and three dissenting, the Supreme Court upheld the right of the newspapers to publish the material.

] The Court issued a very brief per curiam opinion, stating only that the Court concurred with the decisions of the two lower courts to reject the Government's request for an injunction.

In its decision, the court first established the legal question with the use of precedents.

It first stated that "Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity".

The purpose of this statement was to make the presence of the inherent conflict between the Government's efforts and the First Amendment clear/

The decision then stated that the government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint".

Concurring opinions

Justice Hugo Black wrote an opinion that elaborated on his view of the absolute superiority of the First Amendment:

"[T]he injunction against The New York Times should have been vacated without oral argument when the cases were first presented... . [E]very moment's continuance of the injunctions ... amounts to a flagrant, indefensible, and continuing violation of the First Amendment. ...

The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.

The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government.

The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people.

...Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. ...

[W]e are asked to hold that ... the Executive Branch, the Congress, and the Judiciary can make laws ... abridging freedom of the press in the name of 'national security.' ...

To find that the President has 'inherent power' to halt the publication of news ... would wipe out the First Amendment and destroy the fundamental liberty and security of the very people the Government hopes to make 'secure.' ...

The word 'security' is a broad, vague generality whose contours should not be invoked to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment.

The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of informed representative government provides no real security... .

The Framers of the First Amendment, fully aware of both the need to defend a new nation and the abuses of the English and Colonial governments, sought to give this new society strength and security by providing that freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly should not be abridged."

Justice William O. Douglas largely concurred with Black, arguing that the need for a free press as a check on government prevents any governmental restraint on the press.[

4
WinningAnyway 4 points ago +4 / -0

This dumb hooker grew up and joined the slavery, child molester party.

2
WinningAnyway 2 points ago +2 / -0

Motion sense sprinklers have been a friend to me when I was in California.

21
WinningAnyway 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yep they'll be kidnapping kids from houses, holding them hostage. For SURE.

0
WinningAnyway 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's one of the most evil things on the fucking planet.

2
WinningAnyway 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a Federal law against aiding a Marxist org, I think. It might have actually been here I saw it posted.

1
WinningAnyway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too bad charges won't actually be pursued on the vast majority of them all. Government employees have locked the legal system down tight as a drum.

They've got to keep room in jails for white Christians, conservatives, and honest people in general.

2
WinningAnyway 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should immediately be taken off the team

15
WinningAnyway 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or, his brother's wife.

15
WinningAnyway 15 points ago +15 / -0

He's in the other room fucking Obama's daughter.

by BQnita
0
WinningAnyway 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just like the guys at Nuremberg, ''just doin' what the man sed do, I ain't the boss.''

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›