I wouldn't. Words are our bitches, they do what we say or they get the hose again. Regardless of the Latin roots, the real-world definition of "homophobia" is disgust toward homosexuals because that's what society has decided to call the concept.
If that's you, then by all means, embrace the term "homophobe."
By the way, "sodomy" is another example that trips you up. The definition of sodomy is "non-vaginal sexual intercourse." Ever give or receive oral sex? Ever get adventurous with your SO and tried anal? Well, that's sodomy by the technical definition, making you a sodomite.
But we've decided that "sodomite" means something specific, and that's lucky for the people who hate them.
I agree that Starlink is not the end-all-be-all that the technically ignorant want it to be.
I'd disagree with this: "What you will be able to do though, is connect to other StarLink users..."
With the current iteration of Starlink, that's not the case. The user terminal goes up to the satellite, which relays the data to a ground station. The ground station then sends that data over the regular Internet before it gets relayed back to the other Starlink user.
I said nothing about butt sex or diddling. You irrationally hate a group of people. That ALWAYS comes from a place of trauma, and you haven't figured out how to heal it. So, you're insecure. All you do with these sorts of comments is make people pity you because it's an easy act to see through. If that's what you want, keep at it.
I agree, except for the idea that it will be legit. I think they realize they're losing the narrative and are absolutely desperate to keep power to prevent the hearings and investigations they deserve. They will at least try to steal the elections. It's harder now, since it's being watched; the only question is whether they can successfully find a way around the scrutiny.
Not the hero we asked for, but the hero we deserved.