6
cheesygorditacrunch4 6 points ago +7 / -1

How is a non fungible token a scam? If anything proof of ownership with public verification is the opposite of a scam.

5
cheesygorditacrunch4 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, the money is not the main goal the influence is. You’re spot on. Just watch the tickets for Twitter, FB, Victoria’s Secret, and Amazon. It’s obvious the cabal will never let those stocks fail. They experience inexplicable jumps in pre market when they get low enough to keep their share price high, whole thing is rigged, not even a casino.

1
cheesygorditacrunch4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please stop using Amazon. They’re an absolute dog shit company that is raping our country on the tax payers dime.

1
cheesygorditacrunch4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or they could all grow a spine and tell the league to fuck off. Professional athletes are over paid prostitutes that have the spine of a jelly fish. Things I learned in the last few years.

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re not wrong, however, you’re proving my point imo. They’re spending plenty of time hyper focused on one specific skill given the effort that’s required, that it limits their bandwidth for anything else really.

They’re not credible in anything else really other than sports, how does this help society at all? How many pro maga/pro trump athletes are out there? How many athletes are talking about the stuff we discuss on these boards and trying to bring awareness. Or are they told to stfu or get out?

Professional athletes are glorified clowns imo that are hyper focused on their craft but outside of their stadium they’re merely a distraction for people to forget their daily lives for a little bit. Sure, there are some that try but for the last 4 years I’ve seen the overwhelming majority of athletes just shit talk this country.

Also, rant away fren, no need to apologize!

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen. Bruh, I’m going to own the whole damn company myself. Good luck paper hands, short term cap gains is a bitch and the system makes sure you ultimately lose on a long enough timeline. What is sell?

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were with varying degrees. I think fidelity just increased their margin requirements but still allowed buying and selling since they own their own clearing house.

7
cheesygorditacrunch4 7 points ago +7 / -0

I firmly believe based on my experience TD doesn’t buy your shares. Instead they take your money, give you an IOU and just use your money to short the fuck out of your investment knowing retail will sell when they start losing money.

6
cheesygorditacrunch4 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s a straight up lie lol. Like so bad of a lie I’m calling it malicious, they scared.

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amazon destroys/buys out the competition. Read up on how they fucked over toys r us on their e-commerce agreement. And if it’s not Amazon, then it’s another Fortune 500 with deep Wall Street ties. Why be better when you can simply destroy the competitors stock and then kill them and use them as leverage?

1
cheesygorditacrunch4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lower that cost basis boi. With only 35MM shares outstanding, GA.W could own the company!

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here come the synthetic shares so Kenny G and the bois don’t lose their mansions front running and internalizing trades and having to buy them later.

2
cheesygorditacrunch4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Been thinking the same thing. At the least it’ll be used to draw attention to how rigged the casino, I mean market, actually is.

5
cheesygorditacrunch4 5 points ago +5 / -0

Put a halt on the ticker until they can find more sold shares to counteract the buys.

4
cheesygorditacrunch4 4 points ago +4 / -0

Buy direct from their transfer agent. If you buy from a broker the DTCC does whatever the fuck they feel like with your shares. When direct registering your shares you remove the share from the DTCC’s books.

4
cheesygorditacrunch4 4 points ago +4 / -0

Haha you would definitely think that just leaving it would be cheaper, but you would have to pay an entire team to continually manage the logistics of it, upkeep, secure it, insure it, etc. especially a ghost city. It wont be long until people start raiding it and scrapping the goods themselves. You’re also never getting anyone to move in, so you have a depreciating asset on your hands right now while metal is high. Im thinking the analysts are saying their best bet is to cut the losses, avoid the risk, extract as much capital as possible and look towards the next fight.

I’m also not sure if China’s 70 year policy applies to these properties as well where the CCP takes back the “rights” to the land after 70 years, if so idk why these fucking retards would ever invest in land there other than to carry out their evil ass plan. Fucking heathens.

5
cheesygorditacrunch4 5 points ago +6 / -1

It’s probably more profitable to destroy the buildings and sell the scrap material than to just leave them up and maintain them. I don’t know about building codes in China, but I would suspect the CCP would require that those buildings are deemed safe and up to code even if nobody is inside.

If I’m on the right track I guess it boils down to: would you rather destroy the buildings, sell the scrap, and try and make something out of a bad situation? Or, pay to upkeep buildings that nobody will live in ever?

Just my guess!

1
cheesygorditacrunch4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now we’re cooking with oil. Great observation!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›