-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah they do these purges periodically. It has nothing to do with Elon.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

It's Hazelden, fren, and I hope they are able to help your son!

0
comlib 0 points ago +2 / -2

The document is about immunization under sedation for people with a needle phobia, and whether it is safe to add the immunization alongside another procedure if the patient wishes. It is not about sneakily and illegally immunizing people against their will while they are sedated.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

The document is about immunization under sedation for people with a needle phobia, and whether it is safe to add the immunization alongside another procedure if the patient wishes. It is not about sneakily and illegally immunizing people against their will while they are sedated.

0
comlib 0 points ago +2 / -2

The document is not at all about sneakily immunizing people while they are under sedation for another procedure. That would be illegal in pretty much every jurisdiction on the planet. Instead, the document is discussing when it is safe to do the immunization under sedation if a patient wants it and requires sedation due to a needle phobia.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

You would still have to agree to get the shot while under sedation. That's no different from a shot while you are awake.

Whether that consent could be considered coerced, I don't know.

1
comlib 1 point ago +3 / -2

I had to scroll down way too far to find this comment. This document is clearly not advocating sneaky pokes while you're getting your appendix out. It's discussing consensual immunization while under sedation for a separate procedure to avoid a second sedation for the shot.

Might as well be a shitpost.

0
comlib 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's doing a great job of pretending if he's actually still in charge.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

Thank goodness people here aren't falling for that. The latest bugaboo to scare the normies.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

That site has no connection with the actual White House and The company was founded in 2017 to sell Trump and maga merchandise. There's a bunch of sites that say White House in the URL but unless they've got a dot gov they're not official.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm not Mr Dickhead but here you are:

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2021/09/27/face-masks

It's pretty easy to search for "mask effectiveness study 2021" and find plenty of peer-reviewed papers that have findings both ways. I have not read enough of them to discount any out of hand.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

I hate pointing this out every time someone makes this comment but the masks were never about blocking individual viruses. Viruses do not just float around in the air on their own. The masks block some percentage of aerosolized spit and mucus from infected patients, in theory preventing those particles from spreading as far and infecting others. Even if masks aren't 100% effective, they're not 0% effective because clearly some of your cough or sneeze is not going to make it through.

Sorry to jump on you but I heard Gorka say the same thing today and I'm just sick of this stupid misleading point.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

Link for those numbers? I had not heard that, beyond his overall popularity being low.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Largest owner of land means nothing unless it's taking away significant portion of arable land from farmers. That is not the case here.

And if he really wanted to make some money he would have bought oil companies, not renewables.

by BQnita
0
comlib 0 points ago +2 / -2

They OCR most of those forms and they only review filings that set off red flags, which all of our returns are unlikely to do.

by BQnita
-4
comlib -4 points ago +1 / -5

Stop doing deltas. They don't mean a thing unless you believe that Q can see the future, in which case Q is a bastard for letting this all happen and not telling us in unambiguous terms exactly what needed to happen.

Read about why people are able to find prophecy in Nostradamus and astrology and Mayan calendars because it's all the same shit.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

And I'm just saying there's no truth here. He can't even get the numbers to add up. We need to stop following this idiot.

0
comlib 0 points ago +3 / -3

Hate to tell you but this is nothing, again. It's Jovan Pulitzer with his latest "algorithm" that he ran "500,000 times" so they are sure it is right this time. This guy is a complete waste...anyone with any computer science background knows running the same code against the same data even twice is super unlikely to change anything. Apparently his algorithm is so accurate that the new totals exceed 100%. Give me a break.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

Wtf is this garbage? This site looks worse than GWP, the numbers don't add up to 100%, and there's no evidence presented! This is the same garbage we've been fed for the past year.

1
comlib 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yeah and 77.3, 76.4, 75.5, 74.6, 73.7, 72.8, and 71.9 also added up to 17 and 79.1 will do so soon. SO WHAT.

0
comlib 0 points ago +3 / -3

Another valid possibility. Though he would have to know that tweeting something about karma under these circumstances would look like it means something more. He doesn't seem like the type to just share the music he's listening to randomly.

1
comlib 1 point ago +3 / -2

It only said 66.6% because that's the value that comes after 66.5% and before 66.7%. It doesn't mean anything, it's just a sequential number.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›