Wait, run that by me, again? WHAT percent of the United States have been fully vaccinated? THERE'S THAT MAGIC NUMBER, AGAIN 👿
(media.greatawakening.win)
Get Thee Behind Me, *SATAN*
Comments (111)
sorted by:
"The NWO worships Satan," - Putin.
it's very gay
Its sooo larpy
And trans. Don’t forget trans.
Do you mean the NAZI World Order? kek
4th Reich - aka 4th Industrial Revolution - aka WEF - Hitler = Schwab - Handler = Arturo Sosa Abascal - Worships Lucifer.
u/#q936
This does not look like a synagogue to me therefore I reject it. Why are we always deflecting who the real enemy is?
Actually, if you look carefully and with discernment and the facts, it does. How else would Wasreal have come into being? Very serious world events needed to occur in order to masquerade the bad guys as wee little vulnerable victims instead of malevolent eternal predators. What occurred? Where? Posing as whom? Resulting in what?
Why do people consistently use NAZI when they really mean COMMUNIST?
Here's one of the big lies revealed: It Does Not Matter.
Big government will stomp the rights of the people no matter what tag it claims. Nazi, Commie, Socialist, Totalitarian -- all those names are meaningless.
The problem is government. If anything really made sense, then: Left would be big government stomping on the people and Right would be zero or no government, where the people prosper.
Okay, time to speak up again.
The terms have been reversed from their original meaning, which came from the French Revolution.
Those who wanted more power in the State sat in the RIGHT wing. Less, LEFT wing.
We The People, who want small government with power vested in us, are LEFT wing.
Those who want more power to the State are RIGHT wing.
Now it makes sense, doesn't it?
Nazis, right wing.
Current regime in the US, right wing.
Trump, left wing.
They did it to confuse us again, those name-stealers.
Please don’t confuse them with history 🙃
far right is anarchy or rule by no one. Far left is oligarchy or monarchy/dictatorship or total control by a few or one. Your understanding is an example of how they have redefined the terms so they can do the old heads i win and tails you lose.
Apologies in advance for the YT link but this will clarify things for you hopefully
https://youtu.be/GGk6LG0GA4A
Far right is still fascism, Totalitarian but with different ideologies. For example, Nazis are against: white genocide, open borders, immigration, homosexuality, pornography, pedophilia, “transgenderism”, drug/ alcohol abuse, etc. These are facts, which I know from following many telegram accounts of both Neo-Nazis and Communists. Always know what the enemy is doing. The video you posted doesn’t refute the ideology I stated, just re-columns it into different a graphic.
The term "nazi" has a d9fferent meaning than is implied, it's not a description of their political ideology, but of their homogeneity in EUGENICIST thought
When nazis are photographically depicted, we’re talking about Nazis. Except what’s going on isn’t Nazism but communism. (If you think only Nazis dabble in eugenics, you don’t know Communism.)
you do know what "nazi" stands for don't you? National Socialist German Workers' Party, Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP)
These Nazis have leveled up to a globalist party, but the principals remain.
Of course I know what NAZI stands for. Do you know their platform? Do you know the Communist platform? The ideologies are similar in that they’re totalitarian, but completely opposite in their means. A fascist country would look completely different from a commie country. They are not interchangeable.
i think that is what they call it behind close doors.
The faggots who down voted me are glowing reddit cowards. HAHA
Did he actually say that? If so, I'm posting this as the caption when I post the image on Insta. My aunt is going to flip out and say its fake.
If it was a mathematical two-thirds, it would be rounded to 66.7%. That makes it more suspicious.
Correct.
They are doing this openly now.
Doing what? It's a constantly updating (though likely fake) statistic. It now reads 66.7% and read lower than 66.6% before this image was taken.
Just like the Liberty Mutual commercials with $665.
I cringe everytime I see it.
Also in the news, 66.6% of the population seems to be suffering from mental retardation.
Not entirely. Some people who got mandated didn’t have the easiest choice to make. Not everyone is in a position to quit their job on the spot when they have a mortgage plus children and pets to feed.
But yes a lot of these people are stupid. I can’t believe my Dad got it. My Dad is a Trump supporter and semi awake. At least I got to him and he didn’t get the booster. He has vax regret.
Out of all our family and friends only my brother and I held the line. I couldn’t believe how hard it was to convince people not to take an experimental and rushed vaccine for a virus with a 99.97+% survival rate.
Look no further than the boomers and gen X morons who accepted the "just be grateful to have a job" mentality.
Right wingers aren't blameless for perpetuating this evil system and the status quo and lies of needing to keep a career. Everything we have ever grown up around has been because of the lies of money.
I get the decision for many wasn't without its various consequences but damn, to trust the media, big pharma AND the government? I mean, that's essentially what needs to happen to get this thing.
That's 3 serious failures one after the other.
I also have bigger issues with Trump supporters giving into the illegal mandates. We need their conviction and steadfastness, not their weakness. They didn't help anyone - not even themselves.
Everyone with a supernormal IQ has known this ratio since about kindergarten. 2 out of 3 people will fear your intelligence and plot with others to lie in wait for you. 2 out of 3 will easily find mates and friends. 2 out of 3 have things mysteriously easy in life. 2 out of 3 are joined by allies instantly if they are fighting you. Even if those allies never met the 2 out of 3 person in their entire life. 2 out of 3 events will be sabotaged or go wrong.
Evil seems to have a 2 out of 3 chance of prevailing in this fallen world. I wonder if any of you are paying attention yet?
I would bet 1 out of 3 of you are and the other 2 out of 3 are reporting me and this post to moderators. Ask yourselves why. It's Satan's ratio: 2/3
The most arrogant thing we have done as a society is assume we understand 7 billion independent minds after exposure to only a few thousand...
2 out of 3 may be YOUR experience, but it's not a universal truth and I think you're desperate for an alternative answer instead of accepting the obvious: you're an unlikeable douche.
I'm not the one who got bombarded here for being an unlikable douche, GoingCamaro. If one looks a few months back in the archives, that was you.
Hard to believe that 78% of the US got the jab.
You know that those percentages are no different than the polling and election numbers.
Believe it if you are programmed to accept authority as infallible.
In other words it's the same old bullshit.
Exactly!
It is made up. 7+8+2= 17
I think a lot more poeple would be dropping dead around us faster if that were the case. Unless most of the damage will have delayed effects.
Don’t believe it. I call bs
Now it says 66.7
https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/vaccination-rollout-and-access/
I’m curious if it ever originally said 66.6 though. I understand OP has a screenshot but images can be shopped. One like this wouldn’t be difficult
It probably did but it's completely insignificant. This tally is clearly counting up from 0 to 100% by 10th, which means if you catch it on the right day you could have seen any number from 0.0 up to the current 66.7. This numerology bullshit is just a massive waste of time.
When counting by tenths (the lowest digit in this counting system) one has to pass through 66.6 to get to 66.7. There is no reason to doubt that it said 66.6%. Which is to say, unless there is evidence to the contrary, that it said 66.6% is beyond a reasonable doubt.
What "beyond a reasonable doubt" also says is, any doubts you have are not reasonable (at least as you have expressed it). That doesn't mean there can't be reasonable doubts on this topic, but you have not expressed one.
Being skeptical is great for investigation. If you feel there is a reason to investigate whether it ever really said 66.6% have at it, but the doubts you have expressed are not based on reason, rather they are based purely on speculation.
Speculation can be a perfectly valid guide, but it can make no statements, nor should a persons rhetoric suggest that such speculation is meaningful; e.g. "photoshopping this wouldn't be difficult". It is expressed as a meaningful doubt, but it is not.
I could similarly say "hacking the C_A is not difficult" (for some). Should we doubt all of the C_A reports that guide a great deal of our conclusions because it may have been hacked? Unless there is evidence of such hacking and evidence of such replacement of "declassified documents" by other nefarious sources, the answer is no (or at least we should not be making statements of our doubt as if they had validity), because such a doubt is not based on reason, but purely on the imagination.
The point is, recognize the difference between a reasonable doubt (a doubt based on a logical extrapolation of evidence) and a speculation (often based on fear, always based on an active imagination, and not a logical extrapolation of available evidence). I'm not saying the second isn't useful. I use it all the time in my investigation. I'm only saying, recognize the fundamental difference between the two.
Well, two things.
One person pointed out that this appears to be a count around the world as data comes in. It's pretty reasonable to assume that any country with a current value >66.6% likely has had it on their map as well, simply based on the fact that numbers are sequential. Thus, there's not really a huge deal with this.
Two, I dond't really mention hacking. I said photoshop. Something like this can be faked on microsoft paint. I can go right now and make it say the US is 2% and it'd look legit.
If I understand you correctly, your first point was what I said. It was MY first point as to why it wasn't reasonable to doubt that it did in fact say 66.6%, which you seemed to feel was questionable in your first post above. So I guess we are in agreement? Though that wasn't really the main point of what I was trying to say.
For your second point, the hacking was intended to be an example of creating doubt out of thin air.
My response, which came out a little more "lecturey" than I intended, was meant to discuss the concept that we (as in all people) have a tendency to give more credence to imaginary doubts than they deserve. It is a fundamental part of how we remain stuck in the Matrix. We attach belief to imaginations, and use rhetoric to give those imaginings power to influence the beliefs of others.
I wasn't trying to suggest there was anything wrong with wondering if the photo was "shopped." I was trying to say that by attempting to cast doubt on its authenticity, without any evidence to support it, it would create doubt in others where there was no reason for any to exist. I.e. it would create doubt that wasn't based on reason but imagination, i.e. it wasn't a reasonable doubt.
Your doubt wasn't based on any evidence but rather on what you dreamed up as "possible." My response about "hacking" was the exact same thing. I created a doubt (not really, but hypothetically), based purely on my imagination, on why we should doubt everything that we think of as evidence of C_A fuckery. That imaginary doubt was intended to be an example of what you did taken to the extreme to show what it was.
I really didn't mean to direct my "lecture" at you. I was intending it to be an exposure of how we use rhetoric to change beliefs based on no evidence whatsoever. It was intended to be a caution of something we should watch out for in our writing. This type of rhetoric helps to perpetuate The Matrix.
Using these imaginings, cycled through influential rhetoric, can manipulate not just doubt, but fear, or really any other emotion, thought, belief, etc. It is this idea of giving substance to imaginary plausibility's that literally runs the whole world.
I hear you. Yeah I think we’re on the same understanding. I just don’t really love grainy little images with altogether pretty stupid insights either way
None of their other statistics are reliable, so I'm going to go ahead and disbelieve this one also.
My wife works for a pharmaceutical company in the middle of a Red state. They spent months trying to coerce employees to take these shots. They gave away money, vacation days, merchandise, etc. They barely got to 50%. Of course we know that liberals are much more likely to trust in "science" than us conservatives, so maybe liberal compliance offset our refusal.
"They" love to shove their Symbolism in our faces..." they" get off on it, I'm sure...
Just like Big Mike's pelvic thrusts on Ellen.
The website constantly updates the number so, regardless of if it's correct or not, it was bound to hit 66.6% at some point. It's at 66.7% now. And nobody here gave a shit when the number read any other value. But suddenly it reads 66.6% for the first time since the site was made likely a year or two ago and it's a problem. It's not like it just showed up at 66.6% as a single published statistic, it's updating constantly.
Thank you. The amount of numerology bullshit in here is both hilarious and sad. None of it ever adds up to anything (pun intended).
I call bs on that % of people fully vaccinated
Yeah, I'd say more like 40%
Yeah probably in that ballpark
46.66 was the close price of Twitter last Thu. Right before Easter market holiday.
Fake
So what
Also 78.2% 7+8+2= 17 KEK
And in a few days it will be 78.3, equaling 18. So what?
Are you new here? Yeah you're right, apparently 17 has no meaning...... ?
Yeah and 77.3, 76.4, 75.5, 74.6, 73.7, 72.8, and 71.9 also added up to 17 and 79.1 will do so soon. SO WHAT.
You do you fren. if it does nothing for, you move on. Always some Dick that's gotta stir the pot for no reason. Just ignore "how many coincidences" if you like. For the rest of us it's a reminder that they're in control.
It has nothing to do with "coincidences". The number has been counting up for at least a year now. It's literally just math that it would eventually read 78.2%. No one went in and made it say that hoping an anon would see it, it read that because after a year or more of counting up from 0% it finally reached that number.
You simply don't understand how 17 works and when/where/how it can be applied as evidence of Q. If anyone here is new it's you.
Finally, this is a truth-seeking community, don't be surprised when people call you out for drawing connections where none exist. It's not "stirring the pot", it's the whole reason the website exists; truth. If you don't want your comments cross-examined and debated against if someone feels you're not totally correct then this isn't the place for you.
P.S. I just scrolled up before posting and some guy's comment read "17 hours ago". Trump himself must have put it there for me to personally find!
So you know beyond a shadow of a doubt it wasn't put there? Statistics are always correct and true? It's your info that you put together?
"You simply don't understand how 17 works and when/where/how it can be applied as evidence of Q."
Want to enlighten us with the specific places this can and can not be used.
I recall something about too many coincidences. Perhaps we should just toss that one out. Or were there specific rules on when that can and can't be used also. Why don't you enlighten us inn that one as well. I eagerly await your vast knowledge on these subjects!
Frankly, yes.
The statistic doesn't have to be real. No one is putting these numbers there though, least of all Q. It's all done by computers on an update schedule. Every however long the site pulls the most recent statistics from its source and presents that as its data. The sources are listed as "Local state agencies, local media, Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker, Our World in Data, The World Bank, Reuters research". This is where the information comes from and they certainly don't have white hats in there perpetuating the Coof nonsense. Let's say white hats did want to use this site to push a 17. They most certainly wouldn't have done it the way you think they have. Instead of simply manipulating one of the sources to put out a correct number that comes right after the number it should, they'd likely just turn the number to a 17 so it goes from 78.1% to 17% and leave it like that until the website realizes and fixes it. THAT sends a message, not whatever you think they've done here.
You weren't on the site looking at these numbers claiming they mean something before when they read any manner of number other than 66.6 or something that adds up to 17. But suddenly when it does add up to 17 it's some big thing that is somehow evidence of Q. Then a week or two from now it'll be back to not reading anything relevant and you'll go back to not caring and will forget about it again.
It's not a coincidence. It's math. When you start at 0.0% and start counting up you reach 66.6% and 78.2%. This data wasn't just published with these 666 and 17 numbers, it counted up to that over a year or two long period. Military intelligence didn't set up this site just so they could eventually put some hidden 17s in there hoping anons would see them two years down the line. And what would actually be a coincidence is if military intelligence decided to infiltrate the site and implant the number coincidentally right on the same day it was about to hit that number naturally after, again, a year or two of operation. So we can conclude they didn't do that either as it would be too big a coincidence to be a reasonable conclusion.
You people always try to play the "oh NOW there are rules" card. No, you rube, there were always rules, just because you ignored or didn't learn them doesn't change that. When the thing has nothing to do with anything related to Q or Trump it's not a "proof". Particularly when it comes to numbers that appear all the time everywhere meaning if you're looking for a specific one you'll find it eventually (especially when you can just stare at one site for 2 years waiting for the right number to appear and pretend it means something). "Too many coincidences" doesn't mean that if jerry shits himself 17 times in one day that it's evidence to add to the pile that Q exists, it means that when Trump decides to say 17 multiple times in a tweet it's not as innocent or random as it appears. It means when things Q SAID were going to happen, happen, it isn't just random luck every single time. It doesn't mean go find any instance of "17" and claim it's related. It's called discernment. Learn it.
Every researcher/anon worth their salt here realizes that there's a difference between Trump tweeting something or a delta with a Q post, and going to a restaurant and ending up as order #17 or seeing a neon sign that reads 1776 with the 7 and 6 lights dead. Those are actually just coincidences. If when Q said "how many coincidences before it's mathematically impossible" you thought they meant anything other than stuff RELATED to Q (Trump tweets, deltas on things Q posted, etc.) then that's your own fault. Q certainly didn't say, nor imply that that was the case. Q simply asked how many times they have to predict the future before it's not a coincidence anymore.
Now, there is potential for comms in media but that only applies when we're talking about published articles or pages (e.g. short headline that mentions 17 twice and body that mentions 17 exponentially more times than any other number plus maybe it's an article related to a topic from a Q post from that day. Even then, articles can be hit or miss. Hard to know for sure without a good delta). Not sites that constantly update their data to reflect current (fake or not) values, which incidentally read 66.6 or 78.2 that day/week.
Besides, if it was white hats why put a 17 right next to a 666, instead of changing the 666? Not a great look, is it? Yet another reason this tinfoil hat, "it's related, man!", shit makes no sense.
666 - Mark of the Vaxx Beast!
I know more people who either refused to take the vax... or are lying about taking it and carrying a fake card... than people that have actually taken the shots.
I bet the actual vax # is 50%.
I was pissed that so many Christians willingly took the vaccine (even more the ones who knew about the ingredients in them), and were happily celebrating Easter like it’s a woke parade.
Amen- Get behind me satan! In Jesus name? i bind, rebuke and cast you out!!!
Unbelievable, every damn time, maybe they should read some of the Q drops but oh that's right they're stupid. Since they lie about everything I'm hopeful that it's much less than half.
It was bound to hit 66.6% at some point, whether it's real data or not. 66.5, then 66.6, now it says 66.7%
Yea, the number has probably read dozens if not over a hundred different values but it hits 66.6% for a brief period of time and it's somehow a problem/meaningful/evidence of satanism.
Here's the issue: 66.6 is not the number 666.
They used that number for some obscure reason, one that has probably changed a lot because the Revelation is interpretive not literal. Everyone finds a different meaning.
I've spent enough time around pagans to know they do not at all follow Lavey - he's sort of a hippy caricature that means literally nothing to them.
If you are talking about adepts and practitioners, they just laugh at this stuff. To them a number has meaning if it's tied to a thought. In this case, the number 66.6 percent just means a rough sketch of how many people are vaccinated. That's not how magic works.
They used that number because it comes after 66.5% and before 66.7%.
That's almost the milgram experiment result number. I'm sure you are all aware of that experiment but it was an experiment to see how people commit awful crimes because someone with authority tells them to do it.
I know the scenarios not an exact comparison but they did poison themselves and their children because of an authoritarian figures order.
Here's a short video I haven't watched of the experiment, I don't know how accurate it is of the experiment but you could research about it yourself.
https://youtu.be/3YOox59J0Bk
Now I know that's a lie. 15 in my immediate family. Zero vaxxed. Doz3ns in my circle. Zero vaxxed.
If true, the just killed sll their supporters and then some.
There is no fucking way they got 4 out of 5 people in the US to take this shit.
There’s the movie we are watching play out but it’s out of our hands and always has been. But I know how it ends and that’s good enough for me. Tired of it lagging along. Needs to pick up some speed. He’s been free far too long.
Play on words. Have been fully vaccinated can be people who had gotten their first two shots on time. The number of fully vaccinated people today is much less.
Also 78.2 adds to 17 so who the actual fuck knows what’s going on lol
I can guarantee you absolutely nothing is going on here.
Probably because the other 12% are dead.
OMG the 1/3rd rule popping up again.
Now that they have their favorite number achieved, we can go back to normal ..... right?
I doubt it is 78.2%, but more like 30%.
Meanwhile 78.2% is 17 if you add the individual numbers. That's what I saw first but I don't believe the vax number is really that close to 80%.
I was hoping it would be 17%.
Still way too high, of course...
They got their magic number, at least they say they do. Who could be getting jabs that has not done so already? I don't give a fuck about what politician tweets that they have "tested positive" and that I too should get jabbed and boosted, it's never going to happen.
I don't believe that for a minute. Fake. I doubt that many are vaxxed. I'm not afraid of that number. God is stronger than that number. They just trot it our to "scare" us. We're not afraid, Satan, sorry.