1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

This can all be explained by coordination between the USSS and Miami Mayor Suarez and the local police. Of course they're going to do everything possible to ensure the safety of a former president. The Clintons will get the same treatment when they are arrested.

10
conspiracynomore 10 points ago +10 / -0

He just means that Biden is a frail old man and that multiple long-haul trips in quick succession would totally drain him. Biden was in Ireland last week so another trip so soon would probably wipe him out completely - he’d have to go to Delaware and sleep for a month to recharge.

3
conspiracynomore 3 points ago +3 / -0

There were quite a few other things that happened in the lead up to Q+ posting this, including the "tippy top" QProof which happened 5 months and 5 days after Q's first drop.

I wrote a summary that you can find here: https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/i/79155342/i-hear-you

5
conspiracynomore 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well spotted!

It's not the first time Trump has made this "mistake", and last time it was confirmed by Q in drop #2293: https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/i/79155342/misspellings-matter-acquisitions

5
conspiracynomore 5 points ago +5 / -0

Durham was appointed Special Counsel by AG Barr in October 2020. It is not possible for AG Garland to fire Durham without a very good reason:

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

I plead both ignorance and carelessness. I'm British, and we didn't get a US Constitution class in school... those that created our syllabus probably didn't want us to realize a Constitutional Republic is a superior form of government to our antiquated system! Thanks, glad you enjoyed it otherwise!

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

You realize I wrote this? You're right though, that is an oversight and your feedback is helpful.

I think when I wrote that I was trying to phrase it in a way that would resonate with those just awakening from MSM brainwashing if they were to come across this article... to help them realize the "attack on Democracy" line that is so constantly used against Trump by the MSM is actually total projection. But yes I can see why that sentence is irritating. I'll change that...

6
conspiracynomore 6 points ago +6 / -0

You could try these articles. They include QProofs as well as explaining the context of recruiting digital soldiers to fight in an information war etc.

QProofs: "Learn Our Comms"

https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproofs-learn-our-comms

QProofs: @realDonaldTrump Tweets and Truths

https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproofs-trump-tweets-and-truths

QProof: Motorcade Honk

https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/motorcade-honk

QProof: Gingerbread Crumbs

https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproof-gingerbread-crumbs

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "trilogy" movie begins this summer with a Watergate-style #Obamagate trial in congress to get to the bottom of the illegal spying and the Obama DOJ covering up for Clinton (Tarmac meeting etc.)

This will provide the 'lead-in' to bigger scandals for the sequel: treasonous acts prosecuted via military tribunals.

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

Narrative separation... really he knows he will be #48

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Baker might have been responsible for leaking pre-election. But I think everything shifted after Trump won. By that point, Comey likely knew of HRC's plan to set him up. Upon realizing this, I think Comey's countermove was to actually help facilitate the renewal of the CP FISA and allow the spying to continue into Trump's presidency - knowing it would all eventually unravel and boomerang back on HRC/Obama/Brennan etc.

So I think Comey probably personally leaked to Jake Tapper/CNN the fact he had briefed Obama on the Steele Dossier, and this report was used to give credibility to the dossier in the FISA renewal:

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html

Q#2107

Think DOJ/FBI classified leaks to FAKE NEWS > insert into FISA app in effort to provide 'new sources'. Think PDB placement by BRENNAN to AUTHENTICATE source as credible.

Q#3248

[NO NAME][MEDIA - [JB][JC] LEAKSβ€”β†’POTUS Daily Brief/FBI]

3
conspiracynomore 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting! I foresee these guys having a rather complicated role in the upcoming "movie" where they are some of the first people to get taken down.

I think the "[Corn] Harvest" will be the first event that triggers the mass "pop" awakening - basically signifying the start of "the show".

3
conspiracynomore 3 points ago +3 / -0

Really, you don't see RR and JC being charged with anything by Durham/Huber?

4
conspiracynomore 4 points ago +4 / -0

A few things I just found:

July 31, 2018

Mueller Special Counsel (reports to DAG RR) referred Tony Podesta for investigation (would this also be under RR's authority due to Sessions recusal?)

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/01/tony-podesta-under-investigation-following-special-counsel-referral.html

Dec 4, 2018

Michael Flynn helping with a "separate criminal investigation going on outside of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's purview" - (but reporting to DAG Rosenstein?)

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1070138096916799488

5
conspiracynomore 5 points ago +6 / -1

I agree that RR and Comey will be on the right side of history when everything is said and done. The funny thing is they're probably going to get indicted by Durham in the short term (RR and Comey perjury for signing the CP FISA [6.6], + Comey illegal leaks [4.17]).

When they do get indicted, do we try to explain to normies that these guys are long-term deep cover agents? Or is that going to get too complicated too quickly? Instead would it be better to explain the crimes for which they are indicted, and their role in helping to cover up for the Clintons?

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me it seems like that NSPM was written in response to the Solarwinds hack which was discovered one month earlier on Dec 13, 2020.

These executive branch departments were compromised:

β€’ Department of Agriculture

β€’ Department of Commerce

β€’ Department of Defense

β€’ Department of Energy

β€’ Department of Health & Human Services

β€’ Department of Homeland Security

β€’ Department of Justice

β€’ Department of Labor

β€’ Department of State

β€’ United States Department of Transportation

β€’ Department of the Treasury

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_federal_government_data_breach#U.S._federal_government

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is helpful, thanks very much. A few thoughts in response to your clues:

  1. COGCON levels are increased prior to events like an Inauguration, SOTU or another gathering where all members of all 3 branches of Government are in the same location. It is a bit weird that in 2021 that weird voice message leaked, but otherwise it seems normal.

  2. I need to look into this. Have you seen this first hand? Otherwise what is your source the claim that D.C. is still boarded up?

  3. Given that the implementation of sanctions/asset seizures related to EOs 13818/13848 are decided upon by the Secretary of the Treasury (currently Janet Yellen) in consultation with the Secretary of State (Blinken) and AG (Garland), why would Biden be threatened?

One more question if you'll indulge me:

the big question is whether or not that meticulously crafted groundwork was all for naught, or has it been enacted, to some degree.

I'm confused about the "to some degree" thing... Biden seems to have used pretty much every power afforded to a president by the constitution at the point, except for making a treaty. Unless I'm missing something? In what way are you seeing him being restricted as POTUS?

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm familiar with the theory. Would you mind sharing with me what you personally see that you consider substantiates the theory?

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Implementing OPSEC seems like a common sense thing to do to ensure certain sensitive information is appropriately classified and to mitigate against hacks/cyber attacks etc.

But this is being used as 'proof' that Trump activated a continuity of government and 'devolved' the executive branch of the government?

by BQnita
3
conspiracynomore 3 points ago +4 / -1

Is Sperry likely to be getting leaks from Q or other insiders in the same way John Solomon and Sara Carter do?

2
conspiracynomore 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just posted a new article which explains a bunch of Classic QProofs, including the original "Win/When" [15] marker as well as how it relates to McCarthy's win on the 15th ballot. I think you guys will like this!

https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqwIAIis/learn-our-comms--classic-qproofs/

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

This double post is the result of a fairly common server glitch with 8chan/8kun.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›