And honestly, if Matt Furie had just made a badass video venerating Pepe and put it on Youtube, I don't think giving the guy a few thousand bucks is a big deal. This is more for the 20-year old patriot who blows his $300K inheritence on an NFT that represents the exact opposite of what he thinks it means. Again noting that the "profit" here comes from an NFT sale and not Youtube views. Literally, in the description of the YT video, the guy is promoting his NFT on Opensea. So, here's hoping you will reconsider.
I tried to report this but I guess we love the frog so much that we will give money to anyone who posts the frog, even if that person is against us. I really hope nobody here spends money on this NFT that Matt Furie is here trying to promote via Youtube, using GAW.
IMO you were right to pull the sticky. Would have explained the matter better on my report, but there was not enough space to do so on the form.
If you read the comments on the video you'll see it's an NFT that he's selling. They pulled it from OpenSea, probably because it featured Pepe. There's some hillarious irony there. I'm cool if it doesn't get removed but I just wanted to make sure the context wasn't lost in the shuffle. This was an attempt for Matt Furie to get money and he's probably still going to sell the NFT elsewhere. The video is badass, not sure where to draw the line here (that's why I'm not a mod), but wanted to report it in case anyone cares that a non-fren is profiting off of frens with this video.
Do not buy into the NFT, Matt Furie has openly said he does not approve of our use of Pepe and will sue if used by conservatives. He calls us racists and Nazis. He is a 100% non-Fren.
NVM haha asshole Matt Fury, his NFT got pulled from OpenSea.
Bullshit, the guy who made this is the guy who created Pepe, Matt Furie. He is a PoS who hates patriots and calls us Nazis. He made this video as an NFT so he could get money out of us. Please do not support him.
Unless, "white hats in control"?
The title is enough for me, I'm not clicking this one.
at least not political gain...
taking those slings and arrows from who? Certainly not us, and certainly not pro-vaxxers. Doesn't sound like he's taking any risk at all
We should throw all of these theories in a hat and just pick one to roll with. Trump has spoken many times about how he feels on the vax, if we're going to ignore all that and assume that it is for a totally different reason of our own imagining then any theory is as good as another.
A lot of things make sense to me, but sadly this doesn't make sense to me. If a logical explanation had been given, I feel like I would get it. My dad loves Trump but doesn't believe in conspiracies, and he got the vaccine. But really this is helping somehow and not hurting is what you're saying, right?
Totally impossible that they have their website hosted in the cloud somewhere.
Fine, go to Amsterdam and support terrorism.
The only problem with 2A is that it (for now) leaves it open to judicial interpretation what kind of "arms" are acceptable to bear, and where those arms may be beared.
Gotta say that the folks over at RT are a bunch of literal fucking retards though. They clearly have no problem with people talking about how vaccines are the cause of this illness, but they are WAY too stupid to ever recognize some light sarcasm. I pointed out that people were putting out articles months ago to prevent people from realizing vaccines were causing prion disease, but they apparently couldn't understand it when translated to Russian (I guess sarcasm doesn't exist over there), and now I am banned from Disqus on their site. Lame.
oh ok no worries, that's useful info. You have it right here, that's the Shahada ring.
sorry man, got mixed up here
That club is in New York (USA). They are the "new Netherlands". The "old Netherlands" is pretty much 100% soy.
just saying that ring does not look like the Claddagh ring
This really is an important comment. Look at the symptoms of Prion disease
What does Amsterdam have that we do not?
I don't see how this is actually a proof in any kind of way. SS agents aren't just fired when a new prez takes over, and it makes sense that Hillary and Bush would both choose someone for their personal detail that they considered loyal. That Q post pretty much leaves the door open for just about any claim that could be made about Hillary's SS agent. Is it so hard to believe that the same SS agent guarded one person one time and another person another time?
Obviously these children are suffering from nocebo.