1
dbsupernova 1 point ago +1 / -0

This ethics investigation was also retaliatory, it began right after Gaetz publicly accused the House Ethics Chairman of insider trading.

5
dbsupernova 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pretty sure I remember reading that the president has the power to block or revoke security clearances.

1
dbsupernova 1 point ago +1 / -0

To expand of the question of confirmation, Posobiec posted the vote of Garland's confirmation vote, which was 70-30. It'll be interesting to see if anybody opposes Gaetz after voting for Garland.

https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1856816813859828214

5
dbsupernova 5 points ago +5 / -0

The first pick that made me go 'wow'.

Can he be confirmed?

1
dbsupernova 1 point ago +1 / -0

In my opinion it was always going to be Thune. He was McConnell's right hand man and it's just the way the Senate works.

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, obviously there are exceptions and valid reasons to work out of office. I think he was more referring to D.C. workers who are still WFH from the Covid days.

27
dbsupernova 27 points ago +27 / -0

In Vivek's interview with Tucker the other day he was talking about a good way to reduce the size of the government workforce is to make people actually come in to the office. A large amount of federal workers still work from home and if forced to return to the office many will just quit. Then don't replace them.

31
dbsupernova 31 points ago +31 / -0

Pretty fascinating to see him dictating the posts in real time and with so much input from everybody else. Interesting to see Oliver Stone offering input also.

5
dbsupernova 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think Scott is a somebody acceptable to Trump's base and might be acceptable to Senate Republicans.

The problem is the Senate is the ultimate good-old boys club that trades in favors for times just as this.

3
dbsupernova 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just listening to the first 10 minutes, Trump's leadership is desperately needed right now.

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like a lot of things Trump is going to do, this will also probably end up at the Supreme Court. They'll once again have to say that the law, or in this case Amendment, means what it says.

6
dbsupernova 6 points ago +6 / -0

He seemed to have no problem with Jack Smith's classified documents case, so no.

9
dbsupernova 9 points ago +9 / -0

Imagine the complete fear and panic in Hollywood right now over Epstein and Diddy revelations. Who knows what else there is that we don’t know about yet. The whole entertainment industry could implode.

4
dbsupernova 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's clearly been established by the Supreme Court that immigration is a federal issue and states have no say.

4
dbsupernova 4 points ago +4 / -0

If she was good enough to be his campaign manager, she must be good enough to be chief of staff. She must be somebody Trump has a lot of trust in. Supposedly she's been with Trump for almost 10 years now.

view more: Next ›