If he did not recommend one way or the other, he would not be seen as anti vax.
I don't believe that is true. Anything other than coming out in favor would be interpreted as he is really anti-vaxx due to "his movement being anti-vaxxers".
Saying nothing or trying to take the middle ground is basically the same as being anti-vaxx. At least in the hyper polarized MSM. And at least when it comes to Trump, their favorite person to polarize with.
That CIA reading room link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A004000690005-7.pdf
Leads to a document about Stalingrad Red October steel plant.
If the environment was such a potent conditioner, every single person coming out of a slum sort of situation would be the worst possible example of derangement, and that, of course, isn't the case.
There are cases where you have two individuals that grew up in the same place as friends, pretty tough childhood, hang out with the same crowd, but then in adulthood one turns into a debased drug-dealing murderer, and the other just tries to work for his/hers living and is overall a very stable individual.
In these cases you cannot prove the environment was the same. Even two brothers from the same family can have very different environments. And even two people who gets exposed to the exact same situation can interpret it differently because their lives have not been exactly the same so they don't think 100% the same.
To believe that the "overarching factor is environmental" is to give credence to stuff like CRT... basically that's what they preach, that everything is equal, the only thing that changes is the environment/context.
In fact it is the other way around. CRT causes an excessive focus on race. In fact it says that a black person from one area should turn out exactly the same as a white person from another completely different area, with a different type of family. This even though their environments and what they have been exposed to is completely different. And if there is a different in the outcome between these two people it has to be structural racism.
In my experience, two people growing up on the same street can have totally different cultures and experiences. And even the ones that seemed like they where similar even had their own totally different experiences and hence perspectives again when you looked closer.
In my view, CRT is designed to break down into that race actually matters in the hopes of igniting a race war. Because that is what they really are teaching kids when they constantly want them to think about race. It's like they say "it's all structural racism so you should constantly be thinking about race". And in my opinion it's a mistake to focus too much on race -- and a mistake to focus too much on genetics too.
The great thing about environment/context is that it can be changed. So if someone is not getting the results they want, perhaps they can try a different environment. One great solution to improve the "environement" would be to have people not think about biological race, but still accept that cultural background, diet, etc can be of an importance though they are never a "life sentence" either.
The biggest problem on this planet is not social, cultural or economic, it's genetic
I disagree. Talking about genes in that way is a total sidetrack. Family differences is either epigenetic or entirely environmental. So yes the environment of a couple of generations back can matter a little. But the overarching factor is environmental in your own life.
Fresh raw garlic, or fresh raw onions, or fresh raw hot peppers raises blood pressure. A small amount of any of those is usually adequate, although some people will need to eat substantial amounts.
"On 24 October the government shut down numerous newspapers and closed the city of Petrograd in an attempt to forestall the revolution"
The revolution started on October 25. These dates, however, are in the old style Julian Calendar and would be 13 days later, November 6 and 7, in the current calendar system.
This could make a lot of sense. Right before the 2022 election...
Dude. The Zionists wanted Hitler to persecute jews because otherwise most jews would never consider going to Israel in the first place. So, yes, Hitler persecuted jews (in Germany) AND also collaborated with them (outside of Germany):
https://dissidentvoice.org/2012/07/the-zionist-nazi-collaboration/
"A proposal by the British, in the aftermath of Kristallnacht, of November 1938, that Britain admit a thousand children directly into Britain was sternly opposed by Ben Gurion who told a meeting of the Labor Zionist in December:
If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England, and only half of them by transferring them to Eretz Israel, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of these children, but also the history of the People of Israel."
You should look up the Haavara Agreement.
UPDATE: Project Veritas just came out with the vaccine fraud: https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMs5tXBh/project-veritas-covid19-vaccine-/c/
No. AZ audit has to come before 2022. Durham did indict the Killary lawyer on the day before the statute of limitations ran out.
No timeline running out still.
And even if 2022 runs out, 11.3 is still in play.
Hold the line motherfucker!
Yep! Routers aren't even needed.
Agreed, but if Christina Bobbs "conflicting reports" are true (an iffyness that could be there), then it really could take some time before we see anything. Still, a win either way.
Link to telegram post https://t.me/americanauditwarroom/198
Oh, just some biological material...
NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
If that happened I hope they'd arrest him, and try him for genocide and treason among other things.
If Trudeau got ripped to shreds by the mob like Gaddafi was, I would NOT laugh like Killary did with the latter.
That would play right into their hands if it escalates. Would justify bringing in the military and enforcing curfews in the eyes of the brainwashed masses.
And the pilots that are left will crash their planes when they get blood clots....
One non-absurd example: Birth control can fail.
The point here is that it is totally unreasonable to have to do a PCR-test to be able to get surgery. He is right to feel bad about it. You seem to be encouraging people to take unreasonable tests because "it's nothing".
A seemingly sterile piece of cotton that goes up a very sensitive spot. We don't know, but it has been suggested that they can put hydrogel on the PCR tests. Or use them to take your DNA. Or a million other things you don't want. Why would you trust them when they try to force you to do something nonsensical and uncomfortable?
Perhaps it is a denigration and a risk that is worth it compared to cancer surgery? Could well be that you are right. I am not saying that. All I'm saying is that it isn't "nothing" to allow them access to a spot that is extremely close to our brain "just because".
When weighing risks, I would perhaps chose to take the PCR test to get the surgery (if I believed the surgery was needed), but I would at least try to protest and get away with not doing it. Or perhaps do a rapid test instead.
Yes they did – a lot!
Perhaps to the point that there would be no Israel without the Nazis...
https://dissidentvoice.org/2012/07/the-zionist-nazi-collaboration/
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
"A proposal by the British, in the aftermath of Kristallnacht, of November 1938, that Britain admit a thousand children directly into Britain was sternly opposed by Ben Gurion who told a meeting of the Labor Zionist in December:
If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England, and only half of them by transferring them to Eretz Israel, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of these children, but also the history of the People of Israel."
"Hitler's Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to support Jewish development in Palestine."
Ehhhh...Israel created the jihadists. At least Al Qaeda, Hamas and probably had a hand in creating ISIS too.
No one except the deep state. And hence the media. And hence the sheep. And hence even the "no one disliked that" statement would be about just as weaponizeable as an anti-vaxx statement. Regardless, it would create a huge uproar and a big debate about what Trump really believes when much of the MAGA movement is anti-vaxx.
It would get the focus back on Trump. It would allow the media to re-inflame the ol' "Orange man bad" brainwashing trigger. Exactly what needs to be avoided if we are supposed to get out of this crazy situation that is MUCH worse than just the mega pressured, yet still voluntary choice of whether or not to take the vaccines:
We have mandates, qr code tyranny control system, full deep state take over of the whole world with total control of everyone.
Surely that is way more serious a threat than one more old man saying "take the vaccines" a couple of times when most who listen to him know not to listen to him about that.