We have to tolerate Islam and Marxist literature because of the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment.
In the case of Islam at least, this is why we have to be so careful with our immigration policy and paths to citizenship. All US citizens are protected by the constitution. I try to convince my more liberal friends by posing to them "See how much of a mess things could become if we allow mass immigration of people with cultural backgrounds radically different than US culture?"
If they become US citizens, we're stuck with them. So let's be careful with the citizenship process, which I'm sure most of you guys agree with.
It's good to point out tensions within their ideological framework.
Judith Butler, probably the most influential of all these gender theorists, is clever enough to identify the tension, making her pose the question: "what does it mean to be comfortable with yourself as you are? Maybe we should be constantly changing ourselves, there is no "true" you"
That's a paraphrase, but I'm confident I got the gist of it. Here we see an interesting idea many of us are familiar with here: Humans are malleable and have nothing like a "nature"
That there are so many people that hold this idea today has concerning implications in my opinion.
I think some of Merkel’s go down too. And I’m not sure where to place her.
I just think we need more data. More confirmatory evidence (one way or another) with any person.
With Trump we have more than enough to trust him IMO.
IDK for me it’s tricky basing Cabal/DS involvement based on a hand gesture or two.
There is that picture of Trump making the pyramid hand pose after all.
Is that what some in the media are calling the White power symbol ?
Haha yeah Obama’s victory apparently meant nothing for them, systemic racism was still as prevalent as ever for many.
I don’t think the elections in 2008 and 2012 were stolen personally.
For one, neither McCain nor Romney had what it takes to outweigh Obama’s political acumen. Secondly, there was no reason for a steal. Romney and McCain both would have played ball in terms of carrying out “the agenda.”
I remember when some of this first came out in January and didn't go anywhere. Some of it seemed credible at the time, but not sure if anyone has evaluated it more closely. Maybe it's a bunch a nonsense IDK
Maybe later, or maybe earlier
Yes exactly. It is an interesting dynamic. It’s the interplay between when that media says and what the Trump camp says that make it really interesting.
The way I see : it’s a vaccine that comes with high risk and almost no benefit for the youngish (anyone under 60+ say)
And if you’re in your 60s -early 70s and relatively healthy, it’s maybe a little more of a tough call (I’d say no personally).
So for the elderly ( 80+), it might actually be worth it for them to take the vaccine. Because COVID does kill them at a greater rate than influenza. J&J seems to have the fewest adverse reaction reports about it so I lean towards that being the safest.
Trump granting EUA for the vaccines I don’t see as a problem. The problem is he is not there anymore. Trump was not mandating vaccines. It was the best of both worlds in a sense. The prospects of vaccine passports and mandated vaccine is very concerning.
I agree I don’t really get the “Fauci is a distraction from the audit” statements. Some people were also saying that the fact that the MSM obsessing about Trump’s possible return in August, and the interesting responses we’ve seen from the Trump camp on this issue is all distraction. But to my knowledge there isn’t a ton of data pouring in from the Audit for us to look at, the MS Media won’t cover it anyway, so it’s best to try to take everything in and seE the big picture the
Yes that true, good point. Islam's understanding of how God relates to us is strikingly different than Christianity's.
And, as you point out, Judaism and Islam alike have a fundamental disagreement with Christianity about God's being -- his divine nature.
So you're right, while they share commonalities, the differences monumentally shape a person's understanding of our relationship with God.
Yes good point. We absolutely cannot use the MSM's techniques. We all laugh when we read "sources have been telling me that sources know about sources that let us know that Trump is the badguy according to the sources."
I think the most important thing for us to be doing right now is identifying the best information. There's a lot of great work done on here and some other boards, but then you get the shit like not even knowing if the Telegram accounts we see posted really belong to Byrne, Flynn etc.
Wish things were less murky.
They had pretty damn good diets.
Anyone know a good way to get non-GMO seeds for vegetables?
I like that!
Yeah this is a bit concerning. We're now in a situation where we can't easily confirm if these statements are really his. I hope this issue is addressed soon, because I could see it getting ugly. But you never know I guess, there might be some reason for it.
LMAO that's a good way of describing it
In one sense I think that is true. In the sense that Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all seen as Abrahamic faiths and they are all monotheisms. They all affirm one omnipotent creator-God.
After that point you really start to see some differences.
Great question. I’ve been wondering this myself. I’m wondering how the most informed Anons see this playing out. There is no conventional constitutional remedy.
If Q+ really knows what is coming, and nothing can stop it, then this plan cannot be entirely dependent on the audits. The plan cannot be unstoppable if they have to sit around waiting for the results.
But putting that aspect aside, my best hunch atm is that the audits will have to convince enough of the non-tainted military that’s not in the Q loop that there was massive foreign interference in the election. But it would not only take foreign interference, but the uncovering of treasonous actions by enough of the Washington establishment to warrant the military taking over. I think those two things really did happen, but I have no idea how it could all come together from a legal or military-protocol standpoint. I’m curious what other people are thinking who have been tracking all the pieces.
I think that is some well thought out speculation. Sounds convincing to me. One small query: Kagan is generally seen as more moderate than Breyer and Sotomayor, no?