I will tell you this politely. Water should NOT have a taste. NONE. You're tasting the "stuff in the water." Water should not have a taste. Also, you'll find that when you drink "clean" (distilled water) you'll find you actually get thirsty because you're hydrating your body without a buildup of all that crap in the water. Water will remove bad stuff from your body. If you want "alkaline" water, you can add a small amount (pinch) of baking soda. Some people add salt, but the American diet has SO MUCH salt in it, it's completely unnecessary. There are other "salts" (chemical term) that may be beneficial. I DO add some iodine.
That's the FALSE claim that was made by a water bottling company eons ago. One breath of air and you've taken in all the minerals that could be in water. If you want minerals, take a supplement. The chemicals and absolute CRAP that's in water (any water other than distilled) outweighs any benefits from minerals. All that CRAP has to be taken out by your kidneys. Way healthier to drink distilled water. I've been drinking distilled water for over 40 years, and I am over 70 and taking NO medications at all. I'm way healthier than most people. You want proof, it's ME! You want diseases, drink tap/RO water; it's a slow killer.
The way I understand this, the UV only takes out living things like bacteria, not chlorine or fluorine or pharmaceuticals or particulate things. Even RO water has junk in it. I use a distiller. You'd be amazed to see what gets left behind in "purified," filtered," and RO systems. Once you see it, you'll never go back.
I looked at the "full link" before I posted my simple request. The "Full link" is the same video short clip as the clip shown above. The "Full Link" does not have a date or the name of the committee or the reason for the hearing. The "Full link" has only two comments and they are from about a year ago. Thus I respectfully ask for context. For all we can assert, this is somehow fake. While I certainly like the clip, without context, it is meaningless.
Very interesting. Then who "governs" D.C.? Who's laws apply? Can Trump be held criminally liable for a US Federal Republic crime in D.C.? If D.C. is "foreign" to the US Republic, who has jurisdiction? Trump was a resident of D.C. and located in D.C. on Jan 6. So, again what jurisdiction governs? If I commit a crime in France, then French laws apply. Washington D.C. has its own constitution and law enforcement, etc. Residents didn't even have the right to vote un US elections until (relatively) recently. There is defiantly a separation somehow.
Here's the question: If Trump is in D.C. and a resident of D.C. how can he be held liable for a U.S. Republic crime if he's in a "foreign" (separate sovereign) state? I understand "it's complicated" but wow.
This is NOT rhetorical. I genuinely want to understand this.
Slyvr, can you help sort this out?
Washington D.C. is NOT IN the US. It is NOT PART of the US. It is a separate country with its own flag, it's own constitution etc... How can there be a US court in a foreign country? Is the purpose of holding a Trump trial in D.C. to EXPOSE these facts?
I don't know about Joe or Hunter (though I wouldn't be surprised) but I DO KNOW that Jeff Sessions was either a member or head of the AEC at the time and probably had to approve it also. Bob Mueller was definitely involved as I think he was head of the FBI at the time.
I don't believe (for now) that he's "part of the plan."