shoot that's Cheap !! $ 6.67 and up for low grade out here in Commie land! and that's came down 30cents from a few weeks ago.
My neck of the woods Northern Calif. Fuel prices. why in the hell is fuel skyrocketing when all the news even confirms we get No oil through the straight to begin with. Plus we've got Venezuela oil pouring in as well. no this is pure hysteria price gauging we were only down to mid $4:00 range prior. SICK! $6.66 low octane
Mid Grade: $6.86
Premium: $7.06
Diesel: $7.96
California even passed an act to curb gauging, even Newsome got involved! purely political of course...
California passed a law to curb spikes in gas prices. Why isn’t it using those powers now? March 13 2026 cycleshttps://calmatters.org/environment/2026/03/california-iran-oil-profit-spike/
"By last August, refinery closures were looming and warnings of $8-a-gallon gasoline circulated in Sacramento. Newsom and Democratic leaders were negotiating with the oil industry to boost production in Kern County — talks that produced a law that has since driven an uptick in drilling permits.
After Valero said it would close its Benicia refinery, Newsom directed Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission, to “redouble the state’s efforts to work closely with refiners on short- and long-term planning” and ensure a “reliable supply of transportation fuels.” Gunda responded with a series of recommendations that aligned largely with industry’s desires — among them a pause in the state’s profit-cap rule.
Against that backdrop, energy commissioners voted on Aug. 29 to delay the rules for five years. Ahead of the vote, Gunda said the delay would help boost “investor confidence” in the state’s oil refiners, “thereby ensuring a reliable in-state refining capacity.”
Oil industry representatives say the decision made sense – the profit-cap measures, they argued, miss the real problem.
“The real problem is California is an energy island — we’re losing 17% of our refining capacity,” said Zachary Leary, a lobbyist for the Western States Petroleum Association.
But Court, of Consumer Watchdog, said the governor “panicked,” leaving the state without the “hammer” it now needs.
“When you have this type of level of gas run up, you’re going to need those tools,” Court said. "
What I don't quite understand is why Scott Walter And fellow Templar Tim Hogan are so free with the masonic templar history all f a sudden, So open on these podcast about mason and templar history and the conclusions are major rewrite of history even if your a open hardcore history buff , hard to swallow but compelling evidence if all prove valid and true. I just find it odd these secret society secrets are being pushed into the open to prove by their hidden hand, unearthed artifacts, sacrificed treasures and financial claims, the steering of the world and history of Americas founding not to mention the Messiah Mary Magdalene and the blood line and John issues.
Also just as a side note I had thought I had saw a video claiming the templars were reunited under the Catholic church within a year or so back but was simply a jubilee of Hope event, ill post a grok search below that clarified the event and shows that there has not been an official reuniting of the Catholic Church and the Knights Templar's or Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon
top 2 links are THE WHY FILES " WTF " IN THE BASEMENT podcast
Basement #006: Scott Wolter | The Kensington Runestone, Templar Treasure, and the Green Jar 3:13:47 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt4pT6PpCoQ&t=11423s
Basement #003 Tim Hogan | Templar Knights, Atlantis, and the MANY Arks of the Covenant 2:40:48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr-zETVa8mY&t=5462s
Ancient Scroll Found In New York May Have Been Written by Jesus The Randall Carlson and Scott F. Wolter 2:54:33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cdXzwmy2PA&t=82s2:54:33
No, the Catholic Church did not hold any ceremony “reuniting the Templars” or bringing the historical Knights Templar back under its fold. The original medieval Order of the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon was suppressed by papal decree in 1312 and has never been officially reinstated as a religious or military order by the Vatican.
latimes.com
What you almost certainly saw (or a similar video) was coverage of events tied to the 2025 Jubilee Year (the “Jubilee of Hope” proclaimed by Pope Francis). A modern group called Templars Today (also known as Templari Oggi) — a private association of Catholic lay faithful who wear Templar-inspired uniforms and use the name symbolically — signed an official agreement with the Vatican’s Dicastery for Evangelization. They volunteered to help welcome and assist pilgrims at major Roman basilicas (St. Peter’s, St. John Lateran, St. Paul Outside the Walls, etc.) every weekend during the Jubilee.
ewtnnews.com
Key events that got turned into viral “return of the Templars” videos include:Their large Jubilee pilgrimage on May 4, 2025, when more than 600 members from multiple countries entered St. Peter’s Basilica (reported as the first time their group had done so in that form).
templarstoday.us
Ongoing weekend service at the Holy Doors and papal basilicas throughout 2025. A January 10, 2026 audience with Pope Leo XIV (along with other Jubilee volunteers), where he thanked them for their service.
templarstoday.org
Catholic news outlets (such as EWTN) described them straightforwardly as “reimagined Templar Knights” or a lay volunteer group — not a revived medieval order.
ewtnnews.com
The group itself presents its work as a modern devotional service in the spirit of the historical Templars, but it has no canonical or legal continuity with the 12th–14th-century Order.
templarstoday.us
Sensational videos and social-media posts (some with headlines like “After 700 years, the Knights Templar return to the Vatican” or “The Catholic Templars are BACK!!!”) framed these volunteer activities as a dramatic “reunion” or “historic ceremony.” In reality, it was an approved lay apostolate helping with a major Church event — similar to how other Catholic associations or third orders assist during Jubilees. There was no papal bull, decree, or liturgy restoring the suppressed Templar Order itself.(Note: The 2007 Vatican release of the Chinon Parchment simply clarified that Pope Clement V had privately absolved the last Templars of heresy charges in 1308 before suppressing the Order for political reasons. That was not a reinstatement either, and it happened 18 years ago.)So the video you remember was likely hyping up the 2025 Jubilee volunteer work for dramatic effect. The Church has not revived the Knights Templar as an official entity.
https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/out-of-shadows-an-introduction-to https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-1 https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-2 https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-3 https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-4 https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-5 https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-6 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqE-ynQK56mcJQa3P-r9hdhw9p3akFLst
a start
President Trump clashed with Maine Gov. Janet Mills over his executive order banning transgender athletes on female sports teams. Trump has threatened to withhold federal funding if states fail to comply. Feb 2025 Democratic Gov. Janet Mills, https://www.Democratic Gov. Janet Mills,youtube.com/watch?v=YH8T_ld0IeY
HUNT VALLEY, Md. (TNND) — Maine Governor Janet Mills targeted ICE in the first TV ad of her Senate campaign on Thursday. Jan 30 2026
The 30-second spot features clips of officers arresting people and pointing tasers at protesters, as well as criticisms she has made of the agency.
Mills is seen at the beginning of the ad accusing ICE of stoking fear in the state, where agents surged last week.
“We will not be intimidated. We will not be silenced. I will defend you with everything I have,” the governor said in an edited speech.
“If you seek to harm Maine people, you will have to go through me first.” She has accused the Trump administration of terrorizing residents, although the president and other top officials have largely defended ICE’s conduct. President Donald Trump and Mills’s election opponent, incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins, have supported an investigation into immigration agents’ recent killings of protesters, though.
Collins also said on Thursday that she will continue to work with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end illegal immigration, drug smuggling and other transnational criminal activity, despite the recent end to ICE’s increased activity in Maine.
“I appreciate the Secretary's willingness to listen to and consider my recommendations and her personal attention to the situation in Maine,” Collins wrote in a social media post. “ICE and Customs and Border Patrol will continue their normal operations that have been ongoing here for many years.”
Mills accused Collins of acting cowardly, urging her to use her position as chair of the Senate appropriations committee to hold ICE accountable and put “concrete” measures into place to prohibit the agency from acting aggressively. The Republican has supported legislation that would fund ICE and other agencies within the Department of Homeland Security.
“It's cruel, it's wrong, and it's not the type of leadership Maine deserves,” Mills said on X.
Democratic Gov. Janet Mills, https://www.Democratic Gov. Janet Mills,youtube.com/watch?v=YH8T_ld0IeY
Thank you, my search sucked, you are correct and post corrected... Ty
Jewish, Bal 'al, Satan Worshiping, Pedophile, Mossed, CIA, Banker. Catholic Lived with Pope John Paul the 2. according to Cats new post. Son, Muslim Communist Mayor of New York! That is a Doozy! Allegedly.
Now that make sense, His actions, also some of his meetings make a bit more sense!
Allegedly.
That would be a Doozy!
yes but as the info shows "Canadian The Supreme Court emphasized that secession is possible in principle but only through lawful, negotiated, multilateral constitutional processes — not unilateral action or external permission from the UK "
They already dissolved all British control
" Does It Require British/UK Consent? No, British consent is not required. Canada has been fully " sovereign " since at least the Statute of Westminster 1931 (which ended most UK legislative authority over Canada) and especially after the Constitution Act, 1982 (patriation of the Constitution, ending any remaining UK role in amendments).
So Alberta is under strictly Canada Constitutional contract agreement, that requires constitutional requirements first, which of course there are no provisions for succession... So yes either Amending the Canadian Constitution Good luck, or negotiation or yes at last force, unlikely That is why this fella Mr. Marty Struman is going through all the Options of Possibility's, Rights, Obligations and Requirements, I believe they already have the votes for self separation sovereignty, but may not actually to become the 51 US state...IMHO I feel your patriotism!
So then the thought occurred, What is or is there an Canadian constitutional succession clause and would Britain have retained sovereign land title or required process for Alberta secession? Anyway Just some FYI stuff...
Sounds like it would require a Canadian Constitutional Amendment?
Canada's Constitution does not provide a straightforward or unilateral path for any province (such as Alberta) to secede (often misspelled as "succeed" in the query). The key legal framework comes from two main sources:The 1998 Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Reference re Secession of Quebec (unanimous opinion). The federal Clarity Act (2000), which implements and gives effect to that Supreme Court opinion.
Core Requirements for Lawful Secession No unilateral right exists — A province cannot legally secede on its own through a referendum, provincial law, or declaration. Unilateral secession is unconstitutional under Canadian law (and also not supported by international law in this context). Constitutional amendment required — Secession would necessitate a formal amendment to the Constitution of Canada, because provinces are integral parts of the federation created and defined by the Constitution. Negotiation process — If a province holds a referendum showing a clear expression of will by a clear majority to leave Canada (on a clear question), the federal government and other provinces would have a constitutional duty to negotiate in good faith. These negotiations must respect the underlying principles of:Federalism Democracy Constitutionalism and the rule of law Protection of minorities (including linguistic, cultural, and Indigenous rights)
Clarity Act details (federal legislation):The House of Commons decides whether the referendum question was clear and whether the result shows a "clear majority" (not automatically 50%+1; it could require a higher threshold depending on context). The federal government is prohibited from negotiating if either the question or the majority is deemed unclear/insufficient. Negotiations must address complex issues like division of assets/debts, borders, Indigenous rights/claims, minority protections, citizenship, currency, trade, and more. There is no guarantee of agreement — negotiations could fail, and secession might not occur even with a strong referendum result.
Indigenous considerations — Any secession process would almost certainly require meaningful consultation and potentially the free, prior, and informed consent of affected First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples (per constitutional duties, the honour of the Crown, and Canada's implementation of UNDRIP).
In short: A referendum is a necessary first step to trigger negotiations, but secession itself can only happen through a negotiated constitutional amendment agreed to by Canada and (at minimum) the other provinces.Does It Require British/UK Consent?No, British consent is not required. Canada has been fully sovereign since at least the Statute of Westminster 1931 (which ended most UK legislative authority over Canada) and especially after the Constitution Act, 1982 (patriation of the Constitution, ending any remaining UK role in amendments). The amending formula is now entirely domestic:Most amendments (including one that would remove a province) fall under the general formula (7 provinces representing 50% of the population + federal Parliament) or the unanimity formula for core changes (all provinces + Parliament), depending on the exact nature. The UK Parliament has no veto, approval role, or involvement whatsoever in modern Canadian constitutional changes.
Older colonial-era views (e.g., needing royal assent from the British monarch in a personal capacity) no longer apply to fundamental changes like secession — the monarch acts on the advice of Canadian ministers, not UK ones.In practice, any attempt at secession (like the hypothetical Alberta scenario) would be handled entirely within Canada's domestic constitutional framework, though it would be politically explosive and legally complex. The Supreme Court emphasized that secession is possible in principle but only through lawful, negotiated, multilateral constitutional processes — not unilateral action or external permission from the UK.
Can't say it any more plain than Mr. Jeff Rath, I had to gronk it to see who this man is, Plain Speak. as corrected by seernewday, Thank You for the correction, much appreciated, gronk screwed me! I apologize. Straight to the point Interview. Is it just me or does it seem the plain speak interview's as a whole has maybe turned its page some. I really thank Elon for buying X, yeah it isn't perfect for sure but the doors for information is fully open now.
The post shares a video interview with Marty Sturman, legal counsel for Alberta's independence advocates, confirming recent high-level meetings with Trump administration officials like Stephen Miller to explore secession options, including potential U.S. statehood for political gains like additional Republican senators. Alberta's separatist movement, led by groups like the Alberta Prosperity Project, has gained traction since 2022 amid economic grievances over oil revenues subsidizing other provinces, with polls showing 20-30% support for independence as of January 2026. Canadian leaders, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, have condemned the meetings as threats to sovereignty, prompting treason accusations and a counter-petition against secession with over 400,000 signatures, while U.S. involvement risks escalating bilateral tensions over trade and borders.
9 web pages
Economic drivers of Alberta separatism
Quebec sovereignty movement history
who is being interviewed
Searching on X
4 results
Fetching thread on X
Searching the web
12 results
The person being interviewed in the video shared by @GuntherEagleman (in post https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/2018137650541060463) is Marty Sturman, who is identified as the legal counsel for Alberta's independence/secessionist advocates.In the clip, he confirms recent high-level meetings with Trump administration officials (including mentions of figures like Stephen Miller in related discussions) to explore options for Alberta potentially seceding from Canada — and even the possibility of joining the United States as a new state (which could add solid Republican senators and electoral votes). The interview appears to come from a confrontational TV segment where the host pushes back on the narrative.This aligns with the broader context of Alberta separatist momentum (e.g., groups like the Alberta Prosperity Project), economic frustrations over resource sharing with other provinces, and recent polls showing notable (though minority) support for independence. Some Alberta independence supporters in replies push back on the "51st state" framing, preferring full sovereignty instead.
I can't quite make out what the phone says? Do you happen to know? TY Scary looking UMP!
Merry Christmas Fellow Voat Goats,
To Stubborn to do anything Else !!!
97, 99 counting the two jersey's, video is 4 years old though, Hum?
Both interesting post,
Hum?
WAIT ! conspired to ambush and murder! Shot the responding local Fuzz in the neck!!!, shot at responding agents from the facility responding to the attack...
AND ONLY 15 YEARS ? I'm not to good with math and all but only 15 years for attempted murder with injuries to local police shot in the neck seems a little light in the britches to me. Whoa, Drug dealers and bank robbers get more time than that.
Farm supply, feed stores.
Rush - The Trees featured on their 1978 album Hemispheres
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnC88xBPkkc
I read someplace that it was an old Celtic poem, but I cant find any reference to that now.
Is That Scott Pressler?
There is unrest in the forest, trouble with the trees, for the Maples want more sunlight and the Oaks ignore their pleas.
2112, Rush On!
Oh my youth!
What a beautiful work of art, outstanding! I wonder how long it took her to complete, Such beautiful detail. Very impressive.
Chicken Soup!
question is? what the hell was in the thermos that he needed it Ah, inserted 24 hours prior? Thats some careful tweaker planning right there umhum.
And what the hell a thermos? look at the size of that thing in there? That took some doin there? I've never heard of A thermos removal specialist, Proctothermologist removal specialist, I wonder how many years schoolin for that handsome job! Sherriff Grady, he's got a way with words...
Findlaw.com
title 10 U.S.C. § 12406 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 10. Armed Forces § 12406. National Guard in Federal service: call Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
Whenever--
(1) the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation;
(2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or
(3) the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States;
the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
" It's only foolish if you do such a thing and not expect a violent savage reaction."
This was exactly my point, Pissing off the global Muslim population estimated to be approximately 2.05 billion people, representing over 25% of the world's total population. many fanatics that would like to lop off your head for simply being white, Christian or less, yes very foolish.
It has nothing to do with "Bending the knee"
My comment had nothing to do with the contents of the book, or the religion. I'm not sure how people could make that jump from the simple statement and acknowledgement pointing out that it was in fact her own actions that has caused herself to request protection. Whoa, pointing out who she was, since it wasn't included in the post. thank you for your thoughts
First thing came to mind, " They've Got Eye's On The Ball " ?