10
ilovetrump4 10 points ago +10 / -0

There's usually a reason why organizations and people in EVERY sector become wildly successful -- and it isn't because of organic growth.

It's pretty much common sense, but this is a good article that includes that topic - https://badlands.substack.com/p/the-great-purge-of-the-cabal-has

4
ilovetrump4 4 points ago +4 / -0

by JOEL B. POLLAK - 25 Sep 2024

Former Trump administration Department of Justice official Jeff Clark said Wednesday that he cannot find evidence that Vice President Kamala Harris ever personally led the prosecution of a single case at the local or state level.

“I’m looking to see whether she actually ‘first-chaired’ a trial, ever,” Clark told The Charlie Kirk Show on the Real America’s Voice network. “Otherwise, it’s really misleading to call yourself some kind of ace prosecutor.”

Harris frequently refers to her prosecutorial career as a major qualification for the presidency. As she often says in her stump speech:

"As many of you know, before I was elected as Vice President, before I was elected as United States Senator, I was the elected Attorney General as I’ve mentioned to California, and before that I was a courtroom prosecutor. In those roles, I took on perpetrators of all kinds. Predators who abused women, fraudsters who ripped off consumers, cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say I know Donald Trump’s type."

There are records of her appearing in the courtroom, though not always for the better. Actor Jamal Trulove, who was wrongly convicted of murder in San Francisco when Harris was the district attorney, has said that she appeared in court when the verdict was read, and “bust out laughing.” He said he was only dimly aware of her during the trial.

Clark has been researching through legal databases online, and has solicited help from the public on social media. He said that while there is some evidence that she made appearances during some cases, there are no trial transcripts that yet show Harris led the prosecution in any particular case, or that she argued cases at the appellate level.

Harris failed the California Bar exam the first time she took it. She got her start in politics thanks to assistance from her boyfriend, Willie Brown, a California power broker who had been mayor of San Francisco and Speaker of the California State Assembly. Brown later admitted that he made sure Harris was appointed to two state boards.

As a local prosecutor, Harris was known for botching prosecutions while pursuing low-level offenders, such as the parents of truant schoolchildren or people arrested for marijuana possession. She infamously refused to seek the death penalty for a murderer who shot an off-duty policeman, Isaac Espinoza. As California Attorney General, she was known for pursuing a pro-life filmmaker and for trying to force conservative nonprofits to reveal their donors.

As a Senator, Harris made a name for herself by attacking Republican nominees at the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Clark was targeted by the January 6 Committee, ostensibly for his efforts to investigate allegations of voter fraud.

4
ilovetrump4 4 points ago +4 / -0

Such a shining example of executive-league decorum in response to those who disagree with him/don't support him -- NOT!

2
ilovetrump4 2 points ago +3 / -1

Agreed, though the MSM does its best to hide the magnitude of PDJT's rallies while "creatively" reporting on KH rallies to make them seem more well-attended and - because virtually everything about the KH campaign is scripted, fake or lies - the KH crew has also been busing and flying paid "supporters" to her rallies to make it appear she has more support than she actually does.

1
ilovetrump4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pure tyrannical evil. This would apply to unrealized gains (i.e., INCREASES IN THE VALUE OF UNSOLD assets from time of acquisition to date of tax calculation) on all kinds of capital holdings/investments such as significant pieces of property such as stocks, bonds, collectibles, art, vehicles, businesses and real estate/property (including private homes).

Example: A homeowner bought a foreclosure house free and clear for $50k OR inherited a house valued at $50k YEARS AGO. That house is now worth $330k.

The homeowner would owe taxes on the "unrealized capital gains" of $280k (~15% or $42k) EVEN THOUGH the homeowner has not realized (sold and "gotten their hands on") the increase in value.

MANY people would not be able to pay these taxes and would lose their houses and other capital assets by having to sell them or being foreclosed upon to pay the taxes.

The goal: "you will own nothing" and be totally dependent on the government for your livelihood (if, of course, you comply with all its mandates).

Taxing unrealized capital gains is a means to RAPIDLY accelerate that goal to becoming a reality.

2
ilovetrump4 2 points ago +2 / -0

A couple of the biggest "tells" are that 1) all those who are "in the know" keep buying ocean-front property (and pay big $ to do so) and 2) real estate contracts make NO mention of rising water levels

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›