If one sincerely does not believe it is harmful but is beneficial, then there is no internal conflict. That is separate from whether it is wise. People will go to absurd extremes to come up with a clever acronym, and in a thoroughly secular culture (de facto atheist), the idea of Satan is disregarded as much as the idea of God. Perhaps the biggest deception of all. (The Soviet/Russian RS-28 Sarmat ICBM was given the NATO code name "Satan." Just another bureaucratic code name.)
UFOs have been real for a known 80 years (record of prior sightings) without any PR campaign, and now this guy says someone's going to lie about it? And he won't disclose his sources ("indications")? And simply repeats himself, in an oh-so-dramatic manner? The stagecraft reeks.
I would have to see how they did this. I have a hard time accepting that this is any kind of a controlled experiment.
This is what happens when you hyperventilate. Your eyes get all googly and your fingers tingle.
No, God specifically forswore any more floods. Every rainbow is his seal of promise.
There is the Urban Heat Island Effect, where the growth of a city results in decreased greenspace, increased roadways (asphalt / concrete), increased structures, increased human and mechanical emissions, and increased thermal output as a result of power consumption. Cities do become warmer as they grow, quite separately from rural areas.
The laugh is on you, since you probably take it more seriously than he did. Finding clever acronyms is an old game, worth a few laughs (but only a few).
Any evidence for this? Makes for great arm-waving, but no numbers. I think you have convinced yourself that something is true because it must be true.
Charming coincidence. My fraternity buddy (late '60s) had a '63 S-Type in fire engine red. We rammed around in it all the time. Had one interesting night on the freeway north of Seattle, coming home. We came alongside a GTO. Of course, chest hairs sprang forth and we both commenced to step on the gas. The GTO was starting to lead, then we came to a curve in the freeway, and while the Jag cruised around like it was on rails, the GTO was crabbing and braking to keep from departing the road. We had a great laugh. Not much later, we came alongside a Porsche 911 and challenged him. Then the Porsche turned on Warp Drive and its taillights suddenly appeared on the horizon. We were chastened.
It was a great car, but apparently too expensive to maintain, and he replaced it with a late model Ford Mustang. That one we took on a road trip to Colorado and back.
Actually, they are. Just like light. My photons can melt down your shortwave radio and flying missiles. Been doing it since the 1970s. Who said your shortwave radio doesn't work? Your assumption shows that you don't understand modern physics.
Maybe they were new for you... Or are you 200 years old?
Radio waves are streams of long-wavelength photons, and they are real enough to interact with electronic technology. Yeah, they are a "thing" all right.
The difference between us is that I can tell you what I know.
Good for you. When I see someone who is younger than me acting older, feeble, and dull-witted, I want to kick them in the ass. Whatever happened to elder folks who had rapier-sharp wits and enough chutzpah to face down a snarling dog?
El Nino and La Nina are names for abnormal heating and cooling phases of the northern Pacific Ocean. Derechos have been named since 1877 and are not cyclones. We may not be on the same planet...
Yeesh. What a thin article. Dining rooms? Tables? Chairs? Tablecloths? Silverware? Chefs? Menus? Snooty waiters? All for serious number-crunching, I presume.
Well, I retired 9 years ago, so that ship has sailed. Not too old to get into "educational" arguments, however, with whatever fool crosses my path. A long life has gone wasted if one has not accumulated an armory of arguments, cases, and examples.
If you want to avoid "weird weather," come to the Pacific Northwest. We have none. Either that, or it is continuous. I wouldn't know the difference.
How can it be? Either water soaks up microwaves and they simply cannot impart enough energy to make a difference, or the microwaves pass through without absorption. HAARP makes effects on the ionosphere, detected by other instrumentation.
Just pointing out that we have a history of technology and I am familiar with it.
Heating the ionosphere means nothing to the lower layers of the atmosphere. I have a background in atmospheric physics.
What do you want to know about "triggering effects"? I suspect you don't know anything, because there are no space-based lasers or microwave power satellites. The microwave power concepts are chosen BECAUSE they will not interact with weather phenomena. "Scalar energy" is a hobgoblin. I notice so far in this discussion that you allege all kinds of technical familiarity, but I seem to be the only one providing specific information.
In the lead-up to the 1960 election, USNW was a more objective news source than Time or Newsweek. I used to read Scientific American, until it went off the rails in the 1980s concerning the Strategic Defense Initiative.
I am more dismal about Biden's inflation and bad stock market. The "new normal" always seems more expensive. And I live in the state of Washington, whose benighted governor and foolish legislature are taxing gasoline to the price level of Canadian whiskey. (Well, it seems that way.)
I would have used "...has gotten hold of..."
And by "chemtrail jet" you mean a commercial airliner? I would be interested in this documentary.
You never know. It could always be that the weather you thought you were used to was really transient in the geological scale of things. Being a meteorologist in my neck of the woods is a thankless job. Either the weather is obvious, or it's even odds. I can't remember when I payed attention to the weather forecast. They seem to do okay for about a 4-day forecast between sunny and raining.
That's what they say. It may not take a long time for their offerings to not sell well. I cant imagine what market research led them into this barren ground.
Meanwhile, they are continuing Land Rover as a gas-guzzling option, with engines over 600 hp. I can easily see myself in a Range Rover Velar if there are no more honest Jaguars.
I haven't seen any HAARP critic show any understanding of the system or the phenomena. Nothing but conclusions based on speculation over physics ill understood. I've known about the EM spectrum since high school, so explaining radio waves to me is puerile.
I've seen people make a big deal about NEXRAD sensor locations. Weather will be noticed around those locations...because you can only see what you are able to see. Where there is no NEXRAD, there is no weather observation.
I've seen "normal" weather all my life, so long as you accept that there will always be some "abnormal" weather. That is the nature of a stochastic distribution.
An accumulated history of being overruled may serve to quell them. If only...