I am mindful of the assertions by some Democrats that they will simply refuse to certify the result of the College of Electors. How would that be dealt with? Of course, it would be totally hypocritical in view of their constant harping on respecting elections, but they have no shame or embarrassment, so that would not be an inhibition. Ideas?
The 405-grain solid lead bullet at 1200 fps is hard but tolerable. I ran out the numbers and it appears that there is so much more energy in the 300-grain that I think they loaded it hotter. Probably a good idea not to shoot it any more in the 1886. The momentum is very high. Much worse than a .30-'06. I won't argue over needing more muscle on my shoulder!
I was only making reference to the fact that the LIBERAL MEDIA has ALWAYS characterized the 5.56 mm round as being "powerful." Which is ludicrous, compared to long-accepted military and hunting rounds, which have been interchangeable up to World War II. (The .45-70 Government is called "Government" for the reason that it was specified as a military round. Elsewhere, it was used to take down bison and bear. Maybe moose. Brutal against deer. Even in a ballistic vest, I wouldn't want one coming at me.)
Not much here. The video clips suggest more of optical artifacts than anything real. All the palaver seems to exist in a world where the 1960s and onward did not happen, where everything they discuss was already going on then, and with physical evidence to boot. Names like Maj. Donald Keyhoe, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, and Jacques Valee were prominent...but who knows anything about them, or what they had to say. It is hard for me to pay much attention to this deliberate rehash of old, old news for the sake of springing up a distraction. Since Congress has done nothing about this for the past 60 years, I have no expectation they will do anything now.
This is the secret that I suspect the Air Force does not want to reveal: They don't know fuck about what is going on. It is long known that this phenomenon can neutralize nuclear weapons (i.e., make them inoperable from activation), and they are doubtless very antsy about making this known.
Try firing a Winchester 1886 with a 300-grain hollowpoint .45-70 Government round (1900 fps). Nearly broke my collarbone. I love it when the nitwits like to say that an AR-15 fires "powerful" ammunition.
It won't be treason. No state of war. But quite possibly under the heading of Espionage or Sabotage. Severe penalties for military (violation of oath).
We may differ on some of these points, but I am glad to hear that your daughter and husband live in the sunlight of their time.
Technically, the only thing that truly counts is the vote in the College of Electors. And they vote for President and Vice President separately. Much of what we expect is from tradition, not from procedural requirement.
You need to read with some circumspection. Jesus was directing his scorn at the Pharisees, not the Jewish people. Time has passed, and the Pharisees as a class are a different matter, and now the Jews have their own government, not subject to the Romans. Moreover, the Jews did NOT CALL THEMSELVES "God's chosen people." That was God speaking to the Jews through the prophets. Christians are even more "God's chosen people," through baptism and Christ's sacrifice and resurrection.
I am sorry for your family history. I have some inkling of what that can lead to. I'll leave it at that.
Fine. HAARP is not an issue. So much the better. If I have made mistaken attribution, I apologize. Sometimes it is not clear from this comment/reply page what the conversation history is. I have tried more to go back to the original thread, and I guess I will need to do more of that. But sometimes the branch of the thread has been hidden.
So far, the information on the projects has been made public. You can only imagine that it is now secret. But you plunge ahead with the unsupported conviction that it is---as though that were truth. What ways are possible to control the weather? Now, not only are you imagining there are secret results, you are imagining there are secret ways. This is funny. I'm the one with the physics and atmospheric science background and you are casting shade at me because I don't know any of the imaginary things you don't know either. Then, because you really have no answers, you resort to calling me names and want me cast out.
I am privy to a lengthy education in physics and application thereof. There is no fact about HAARP that substantiates the fantasy being spun about it. Every part of your claim is imaginary, so pause and look in the mirror. Just because I don't know about an IMAGINARY "classified program" does not mean it exists. It does not exist because it makes no scientific sense...and there is no evidence for it.
I can't prove there are no goblins in your bedroom closet. Does that mean they are there?
Check with the mods if you can't believe an honest answer. I didn't delete anything. If you can't and won't prove what you are claiming, kindly cease with the libel.
Please. Far more credible (and encouraging) to take this as a judgment from God. No "hats" are this powerful.
Israel did formally apologize and render restitution. I guess nothing will satisfy you?
Here is my theory. Under operational circumstances, the Israelis had no idea if we were innocent observers (not a credible assumption) or intending to pass their intelligence collection along to the Egyptians, which could have been catastrophic for them. So, a rash decision was made. Rather the diplomatic risk, than the genocidal risk.
Might want to stow the Satanist libel and outright hatred.
This is my current incarnation. I was formerly DeathRayDesigner, but had a glitch, couldn't recall my password, and had to create a new handle. I've been here a lot longer than that (not that I am boasting about it). But why should we argue over facts? It is important to keep an open mind.
My opinion is based on professional technical knowledge. I think it matters more than ghost stories and popular mythology. CIRRUS was a flop; the front page of the final report says so (I read it). And HAARP is only a probe into the ionosphere, which is a vacuum for all practical purposes. I notice you do not dispute these facts.
Doesn't matter. Project CIRRUS was a flop. And HAARP has nothing to do with weather.
Exactly. When we start thinking that way, we begin to get sensitive to how and when we are able to do something. I always recommend "start easy...but start." Some campaigners want you to become a total cult convert and overturn your life---but all that does is turn people off. Or burn them out.
Nearly 30 years old with no issue resulting. Robert Fletcher is who? Senator Claiborne Pell was a Democrat and passed away in 2009, evidently not saying more on the subject. Lists of patents are mere paper; they don't even need to have working models in existence. Small-scale cloud-seeding is not very effective "weather manipulation." Plenty of natural phenomena violate the expectations of people.
Weak sauce: "I have lots of patents and someone told me so."
And when it is actually not true. You can't use reverse psychology as a truth-finding tool.
During the Rodney King riots, the shopkeepers maintained a conspicuous patrol on the roofs of their stores, armed with AR-15s. Their stores were not molested.
Walk-in appointments must stop. People must run for office and contest them strongly. Publicize like hell. You are sunk if you can't find enough people to join together. I faced something like this in my union: walk-ins elected to office at the beck and call of our Executive Director (a hired staff member).
I don't understand how these drops are relevant, or even reliable. They are 7 years old and refer to events that were "over the next several days." I don't recall any such events, or levels of crisis. Were they posted by Q?
There are plenty of "strange-looking" clouds that are nevertheless natural. Look and you can find them. "Scalar waves" are mythical. Ever seen a Mackerel sky?
Patents are only so certifications of Bright Ideas. There are a lot of them, but where is the implementation? The best they can do is cloud seeding for the stimulation of rain in a fairly stable environment. Attempts to tinker with hurricanes have fallen flat, because hurricanes are subject to far more powerful influences than human beings can impose. So, your logic (lots of patents => they are doing it) is a hole looking for some cheese to put around it.
I agree, His artistic nature is evident in his very expressive diagrams. What he has to say about transcendentalism reminds me much of Jiddu Krishnamurti: attainment of peace "without trying." It was an echo of the phrase from his movie, "Dune", in which interstellar flight was "traveling without moving." I couldn't help but notice the similarity.