2
lsdQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, this is something I suspected since getting into Q.

Would make perfect sense. Fits their MO: create a problem and push into their existing “solution”.

6
lsdQ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Btw it’s a whole thread. I recommend clicking through and reading the whole thing.

3
lsdQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do we know this is really a line item? Would be great to have a source on it for redpilling purposes

3
lsdQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is “international development” anyway? I always wondered that.

Why doesn’t this person list what skills they have? Like are they an accountant, lawyer, project manager or what? How can they have NO skills AT ALL outside “international development”?

16
lsdQ 16 points ago +16 / -0

Aside from the lolz, I hope there is useful evidence that comes out of their phones, notes etc.

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure if it said "Go home" earlier, but right now it says "Go to home page".

https://www.whitehouse.gov/es/

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they bother to try to argue against timestamp correlations between Q posts and Trump tweets? Wouldn't they want to tie Trump to Q, since in their minds "Qanon" is a scary boogeyman?

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

No idea, haven't seen any further news on this

2
lsdQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

We’re back to SERIOUS journalism, folks. Speaking truth to power, etc.

4
lsdQ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Q drops actually never said Trust Pompeo, it said Trust Kansas, anons just assumed it meant Pompeo.

view more: Next ›