2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

IF ONE is trying to get as much info so that they can ultimately decide what makes the most sense to them then I suggest this video on the "might be staged side."

https://rumble.com/v6z5jjg-the-charlie-kirk-assassination-hoax-full-breakdown.html

5
Paramount 5 points ago +5 / -0

May not be definite yet , but Im leaning heavily towards one way.

And I start back at the beginning, taking in all the info I have learned since then and go forward.

And ALL I can think of is that if the very first thing doesnt make sense then anything that follows from it is akin to fruit from the poisonous tree.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1jfRn154vt5s

8
Paramount 8 points ago +8 / -0

staged but still a fun watch

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh ok

I understand what you are saying

I was mostly referring to the way the wound appears to remain static as his neck moves and the way the blood never falls all the way down, as if on an incomplete loop

watch at .25 speed, its freaky as the words on his shirt appear to shape shift as well

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1jfRn154vt5s/?list=notifications&randomize=false

5
Paramount 5 points ago +5 / -0

where besides those ridiculous text messages?

I must have missed that one

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

I cant keep track, will you be kind enough to c/p for me?

4
Paramount 4 points ago +4 / -0

Armor? There is not even evidence of blood in the SUV clips.

Reminds me of the Boston Bombing where they wheel the guy who got his LEGS BLOWN OFF

not only acting as though he just has a headache but NARY a drop of blood in the entire trail that they just walked....absurd

https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2013/04/16/marathon-16_9.jpg?width=660&height=374&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp

2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont think anyone can logically explain it,

I doubt they can explain the blood that never falls all the way down...it acts as though it were on an incomplete random looping pattern.

to me a downvote on a legit question is akin to someone saying "move along conspiracy quack"

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hang in there pal.....you will figure it out one day.

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay I see you are still raging against questions.

Raging doesnt mean cussing people out it is the smug arrogance and dismissive nature of your replies that reveal you have closed your mind to anything that counters your initial beliefs.

I understand its just a defense mechanism in the same way OTHERS cry out "conspiracy theorist" to anyone questioning false narratives that THEY believe.

BTW I thought you were through replying.....

NO need to go to conspiracies.win, this is GAW where we have been trained to question everything...maybe YOU should try it.

PS I agree Charlie is either in Heaven or Valhalla, either way I dont have access to him so Im not bothering him in the least.

3
Paramount 3 points ago +3 / -0

and I have seen it reported that he DIDNT have any type plate or vest on.

So we cant even get a consistent story about that tiny aspect either

per google The FBI did not confirm if Kirk was wearing a bulletproof vest when he was shot, nor did Kirk's organisation Turning Point USA. But investigators have said that he was shot in the neck- an area not usually protected by a vest

5
Paramount 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe it is an IQ test to guage where people are in the awakening process?

How much BS will the public buy vs How much will the public push back

5
Paramount 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not sure what you mean....Im saying that IF we agree that the bullet hit a chest plate, then I would imagine it had to do damage to the Tshirt to some degree and I dont see that .

10
Paramount 10 points ago +10 / -0

And we KNOW Robinson had to have made the kill shot because his DNA was on the rifle and he was running on the rootops....evidence of the gun even being fired is not required.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›