On a contrary I will say this:
If the wrong people do the “cleanup” - they wouldn’t fire the ones that they should (perhaps they might fire the patriots who don’t agree with their worldview).
Once the wrong people get fired - how to revert this process? It would take way longer when the only ones still left in the position of power (after the “cleanup”) would be the bad guys.
It not only gives these nominees a motivation to clean up the swamp.
It also neutralises an argument of the fake news that these people are going after their political opponents.
Instead: A clear message to the public will come back as an answer: ”I’m trying to assure that, what happened to me, won’t happen to you in the future”
Body language:
Excessive blinking can indicate anxiety, which often pairs with lying. If the level of blinking seems exaggerated, it might be because the person is lying. Eyes that don't match up with general facial expressions may demonstrate internal conflict or a covering up of the truth.
“Nominating someone who has a track record of pushing conspiracy theories … is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.
If people like this are saying similar things - is this a Q proof? It sounds like.
Let’s think logically:
The new DNI (with a track record of “conspiracy theories”) starts the job. What are the possible scenarios?
-
The DNI gains the access to the best information in class and finds out that the “conspiracy theories” were just false … curing the brain from ever believing these type of theories again.
-
The DNI gains the access and finds out that all these theories were true!
“… is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.
Let’s look at our scenarios:
-
Is the first one dangerous? Nope.
-
Is the second dangerous? Yep! Dangerous for them.
What the ex-CIA just told us? Is this a Q proof (right from the Deep State)?
Good!
It will help them to feel better and to survive a difficult time.
No one will criticise them there.
All 3 other people on this platform will agree with them.
A return to the reality will be hard tho …
4-6% lost forever
Just to correct people talking about 11.3 - it’s not 11. It’s capital ii.
Source: https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm
There is no Article 11: The last article is Article VII (Roman VII = 7). Article 7.
The Article II discussed here is Article 2: The II isn’t 11. It’s double capital “i” (Roman II = 2). Article 2.
Considering the above - its Article 2 (II), section 3:
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Yes. Exactly. Where do we know this phrase from?
https://greatawakening.win/p/199hXJSTcW/warning-from-bracelets-to-tattoo/c/
Now, Mr Musk - please unblock the accounts called by Q “Patriots”:
I’m sure she is so proud now that the President is holding The Bible too and promoting it:
https://greatawakening.win/p/199hXJSCIq/trump-we-are-bringing-the-bible-/
He said: Make America Pray Again (MAPA)
Bannon, last 2 seconds: ”Maybe we end up with some drumhead trials”
It has zero “0” instead of “O” in the account name.