21
propertyofUniverse 21 points ago +21 / -0

May RFK have the strength he needs at this difficult time.

My thoughts are with him and his family.

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

He doesn't

The ear was photoshopped on.

Take a good long hard look at that picture, and if you're in doubt, take samples of the picture and test them for AI

Here's the meta analysis:

Why do we have that picture available to us at all?

How did anons figure out it wasn't Epstein on the gurney?

How would the glowies convince anons this body is Crooks?

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why hasn't he come forward and say, hey you made a mistake.

He did, but that got rather memory-holed

Dude, you're writing a screenplay here. So now there's a team of assassins huh?

Of course. This is not a lone gunman, it's a response to the threat that Trump poses to the deep state.

It just happened again at the golf course didn't it?

Were you born yesterday?

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also I've never actually understood where the info on Yearick came from to begin with.

It was the MSM that originally ran with the name "Yearick" I believe, before they settled on "Crooks"

I am afraid I don't have the source for this, but I can have a dig around and see if I can find it.

My understanding was Yearick is some antifa type And I don't think of those guys as having a military background.

Antifa contains agent-provocateurs, they are fedbois, glowies, some of them have an insurgent background.

Isn't this obvious? Kek, it ought to be to you!

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Switch the body?

People saw someone on the roof. I am assuming at this point that the body we saw a picture of is a shooter, but not that it is Crooks necessarily.

I am also assuming that the body they autopsied and cremated was this shooter.

So, no need to switch the body.

For example, there's no evidence that Yearick was in Butler Pennsylvania that day at all, right? We actually have no evidence of that.

We have a picture of a dead guy who looks just like him and he hasn't come forward to point out that he's not missing. I think that, coupled with the abandoned van with Arizona plates is fairly good evidence.

There are 50 states, the van had Arizona plates, I recall a video interview of a guy saying it.

Can you see why a team of assassins would prefer the public face to be a clean guy like Crooks and not a goon with CIA /Ukraine connections ?

The investigation would stop with "lone gunman" and not continue back towards the team's backers.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very interesting take. Hadn't considered that they might have killed someone to frame them.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why was Yearick's white van there with it's Arizona plates? Why is he missing?

Why didn't the secret service have someone effectively watching that roof? It's the most obvious vantage point for a shooter.

Given that Yearick was a guy with combat experience in Ukraine, doesn't that make him fit the profile for a sniper? You prefer to think that the shooter was a 20 year old greenhorn acting on his own?

Where would Crooks get the components for the devices found in his car? Did you know that Yearick's family make explosives for the CIA in their factory in Arizona?

I think the simplest explanation is that there were several people involved and some of them were in the secret service and left room for the assassination and scuppered the response when the shooter was seen.

That means that Yearick was definitely involved and Crooks was likely involved too.

If it was Yearick who was killed on the roof, the conspirators would want to hide his CIA connections and Ukraine connections and would prefer the public to see Crooks as a lone gunman. So, this is why the autopsy might be fiddled and it's a good reason why they cremated the body quickly and outside the normal process, so the meta clues we have are for a cover-up of the shooter's identity.

If you can't admit to this possibility given all the clues, I'll assume you're running cover.

That is reasonable isn't it?

3
propertyofUniverse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I've been wondering about that storm and this storm.

Do we think this is a case of double meanings?

5
propertyofUniverse 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was wondering that. Perhaps when they got on the roof they weren't sure he was dead and restrained him.

it does seem redundant considering the apparent blood loss and the hole in his neck.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +4 / -0

That makes a lot of sense to me.

They also apprehended a Pakistani agent in connection with this didn't they.

Can't remember his name right now.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›