Would that be a problem for you? Kids born differently getting toys that reflect them?

I thought the video in question was shot during 2018, when Biden was not in office?

Presentation is key

I ask again - what is your proposed solution beyond whining whenever something inconvenient for you is cited behind multiple unnamed sources? Do you propose a ban on unnamed sources? An official government board to vet and verify unnamed sources, thus hindering the ability for reporters to report things the government would rather you not know? An official industry board to vet and review things by media heads? A push for the public to fight against unnamed sources no matter how convenient or inconvenient that reporting is for their ideologies/preferred team? What?

And that hilarious caps locking above. Are y'all really pretending like if NBC NEWS had verified WaPo's reporting, that would mean a damn red cent to you? Like it wouldn't all be "Well of course EnbySemen would say that" or whatever amusing derogatory term is popular for that particular network right now? Sheesh.

What if it's not tho? And you didn't answer the question. Confidence is a flimsy shield.

When you say "when Clinton took classified documents", you need to be more specific

Sure hope we don't keep seeing weather events and natural disasters in a scope and rapidity not seen before

I think retro is saying that the loss in 2020 was an intentional allowing of a fix in order to record and expose the fix?

So, in your ideal mediascape, would there be no unnamed sources?

I was honestly going to link this. I am still searching for a cogent rebuttal

Not likely at the Daily Mail

Yes, that is what that word means

I guess I'm still confused as to what could happen to cause there to not be a showdown.

I am not looking for a PMM for just the FBI raid - I believe I have not properly communicated this point. I am seeing the FBI raid as the PMM for the whole kit'n'caboodle. Because, and this is my point, if it's not just a PMM but the PMM, then Trump faces an intense uphill legal battle. I won't say impossible (what with his remade, sympathetic judiciary) but near as.

Also, I said before I didn't think it would be before midterms, and with the news of the Trump subpoena, November 14th seems like the earliest date.

So, looking back on everything, I think this is where we stand: you do see a possibility for a third option, where the FBI raid is resolved and Trump is somehow neither victorious nor hosed, and the game continues for a few more turns. I have been trying to suss out what that option is, not getting that what you were saying is that the third possibility is possibility. You don't have a hard read or long theory on what that possibility is, just that you are acknowledging the constant plays of forces beyond our awareness and control means that there is always the possibility of some unguessable third route. I was trying to squeeze concrete detail from a point that was ambiguous by design.

But the meme shows surprised people literally underwater

And it specifically mentions flooding

You adding context in terms of the proverbial Coming Storm adds some semblance of a point, but the original meme as it was made is all but meaningless. Since it describes a modern-day attitude and then follows it up with describing specific actions that occured thousands of years ago and God then promised to never do again.

If you'd just made a post that said "God promised to never Flood the Earth in retribution again, so we will do it to please Him with our righteous anger (metaphorically)!", I wouldn't have any quarrel with it. You added some context, but the original underlying meme is still gibberish.

Why on earth would the one year wrap up in March? That's two months off

Dude doesn't know how to make a camera point at his face

Was this posted before or after the Trump subpoena was announced, with a deadline of November 14th?

So, you're saying you think the demand in India is actually high, this product wasn't expired, and this business is just choosing to throw away money?

This is good, as long as the globe isn't warming

I MEAN, IT'S NOT LIKE HE MADE A COVENANT IN THE SKY THAT HE WOULD NEVER DO SO AGAIN

what a strange, Biblically irrelevant meme

So... Did you and the seven people who upvoted this actually read the linked top answer that includes the header image? Because that answer is all about how Trump did not and could not have declassified the documents along currently established legal procedure. Unless I am really misreading things, and I read his whole thing twice because I was confused at the mishmash between what I thought i was going to get based on the link title, and what I actually got.

This is why I think it's Endgame either way - either Trump has a grand reveal Perry Mason Moment (that pretty much HAS to be "I was secretly still President" or "Here is proof the election was stolen" for him to be saved from legal repercussions), or he rather brazenly and bizarrely performed obvious crimes and he's screwed.

Y'all forget Pyramid exists? Nothing about this is new besides the potential for lower level law enforcement to have access to the spy tech without having to go through the NSA each and every time.

"Will a hole literally open up underneath Washington and swallow only the evil people?" I dunno, probably not?

Someone should do something about all these floods

Y'all forget who the Commander-in-Chief is or what