I was hoping someone would add this - good video. In it, I think this is why Dr. Tenpenny made a point of calling it transmission instead of shedding. Shedding refers to natural viruses and this is something different.
There was also a good video by Clif High where he theorized that it wasn’t a case of direct transmission of mRNA, but indirect effects. mRNA “vaccines” > screw with women’s pheromones, wonky pheromones > mess with the cycles of other women. Something like that.
This seems timely given talk of how the cyber polygon event this summer might prove predictive (like event 201 in the fall of 2019):
“Kaminsky, who also worked as an adviser to a number of Fortune 500 companies on security, was so trusted for his skills that he was selected in 2010 as one of seven people who could “reboot the web” in the event of a catastrophic internet meltdown.”
Spencer’s Gifts at the mall used to have them, if your mall still has one of those, haha.
The left has been saying all along that voter fraud is a myth. That if it does happen, it’s statistically insignificant. And if there are any irregularities at the polls, it’s always an attempt to disenfranchise minority voters.
If they were using this audit to manufacture a case for republican cheating, I think it would contradict the narrative they’ve spent 20 years creating. It would do them more harm than good since (fingers crossed) it looks like they will show factual examples of fraud, in huge numbers, in a predominantly white county. That busts their narrative.
I’d say, based on what I see in the US, 90% of people’s information comes through a device that’s censored, sorry, “curated.” The iPhone gives google, Facebook, the New York Times, cnn, big pharma, law enforcement, etc. a presence in everyone’s pocket. Take the iPhone out of the equation and the companies who have built the infrastructure over the last 50 years only reach 10% of the people they’re reaching now. And the data they’d be gathering would be worth 10% of what it is now (minus GPS and biometric ID type authenticators). The real nefarious players get front row seats in our lives thanks to Apple’s innocuous looking tech. It’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Wanted to add wireless banking into that too - how many more decades would it take to implement a monetary reset if apple (and others) hadn’t already acclimated people to using phones to pay?
What if it’s a head fake with the CNN hashtag and he’s really going after Apple? They always seem to avoid getting lumped in with the other tech giants when they are the tip of the spear for Agenda 2030.
I thought I was the only one who noticed haha. Stephen King is a chump but I did read The Dark Tower series back in the day.
No, it’s more like people getting in the way of the Great Awakening prevented Q from finishing the plan earlier. There are some dense motherfuckers out there that refuse to wake up to the facts in front of them. And then there are the people actively preventing them from seeing the facts. Q had/has a plan but I think they over estimated the critical thinking skills of the average citizen when setting a timeframe. Sad that people across the globe understand the Great Awakening but people in the US with 2 masters degrees still think it’s just a “conspiracy theory.”
It’s all for show, kabuki theater kid gloves type stuff between the tech giants. Their bottom lines all depend on each other and they all eat at the same restaurants anyways. Apple knows people would just start buying other brand’s phones if they took a real stance on blocking google/twitter/facebook/etc. They can’t afford a real stance on privacy, they just beat up on the small fish so it fools the tech illiterate rubes.
There was a Wikileaks dump that contained a photo of someone named Steve Job’s positive HIV test paperwork. Someone said back then that the social security number was different from his real SS#. I take both sides of that with a grain of salt but I now also take everything related to HIV with a grain of salt.
However, I do feel it makes perfect sense they would take him out so that he couldn’t stand in the way of Apple’s part in the NWO/Agenda 21/2030 thing.
My thoughts are somewhere in the middle. It’s a honeypot but not for us. It’s a trap for the people hiding behind Twitter that they couldn’t catch.
I was thinking today that attempts to attack places like Twitter head on fail because of the old “it’s a private business, they can do what they want.” Bullshit, but okay. However, if you set up your own site and they attack it, try to censor it, now you have a grievance.
It’s no longer you having to follow the rules of their house, they have to follow the rules of your house. And up until this point, there hasn’t been a conservative site large enough to put this in front of the average American. As much as I loved the Donald on reddit, gab, patriots.win, etc, most of the normie conservatives I’ve mentioned those places to had/have never heard of them.
But they’ve all heard of Mike Lindell, General Flynn, Steve Bannon,...now you’ve got a visible case for censorship, on your own turf, involving household names (instead of username kekbombmagapants76 trying to get a case on the docket).
I’d say it’s a trap for them not us.
Wanted to add: at this point in the censorship game, what kind of idiot would let Cloudflare host their site? They can’t be that dumb so my guess is that they did it intentionally so Cloudflare would do their usual stunts, and they could catch them in the act.
Thanks! Done.
I think he’s referencing a 4-5 year old video someone reposted on patriots.win. Not that it makes it right, but we want to keep things accurate. Another way of looking at it is that they’ve been rioting and making it racial since before Trump even made his first executive order, and before Q made a single drop. And yet they’ll blame every riot from here on out on them.
I love Lindell but give them my phone number?
Have we learned nothing in the last 4 years?
Hopefully they ditch the phone # requirement after the VIP phase because I want anonymity as much as I want a place for freedom of speech. Don’t want to put anything out there to get doxxed with.
Not a bad article. My views on Forrest Gump aren’t quite as positive but I never thought that Jenny might represent post-modernism and cynicism while Forrest symbolizeD American idealism and Christian values.
Knowing everything we know now about Hollywood, I see the movie as a big fuck-you to American history. Forrest is good and pure and strong but super dumb. Undoubtedly that’s how globalists view us (strong but dumb). The fact that they tie his storyline to every major event in US history makes it seem like all our successes were an accident (like a feather in the wind). And after running across the country, he tells everyone that he just felt like running. In other words, there was no deeper meaning to his efforts, no deeper truth. To extrapolate, there wasn’t any deeper values that drove the success of the US, it was all dumb meaningless luck.
Sure they dress it up with an awesome soundtrack and memorable characters and quotable lines, but it seems to be the antithesis of the Great Awakening to me.
Not quite as bad as WV, but Kentucky isn’t as friendly to homeschooling as you might imagine. I think they still have religious exemptions for vaccines but when researching this myself, at least on paper, KY isn’t as freedom loving as you’d think.
It’s been years since I dug into this but I remember during the Obama controversy, an earlier version of Blacks Law Dictionary spelled it out clearly. Of course they revised the definition of natural born citizen after Obama’s questionable origin story, but it was always clear as day what they meant by it. While the constitution in and of itself is brief, the larger body of Common Law is not. It clearly distinguishes the difference between natural born (2 parents, no foreign allegiances), native born (born on US soil), and naturalized (immigrated legally). There might have been one more category I’m forgetting but you get the idea - Common Law predates the US Constitution and established the meanings of the words that appear in it. It seems vague to us in the 21st century but in the 1700’s, all these legal terms were well established.
Subtract British Columbia and add Manitoba, Ohio, Indiana, AZ, Indiana, and NH.
Or better yet, just subtract a few leftist cities and unite all of N America under one banner. Most of Canada is probably just as sick as we are of European globalist control. I’d welcome 3-4 new states of our buddies to the north.
As entertaining as it is to redraw the map, I’d still be wary of an attempt by the globalists to split us up ala the Soviet Union. Then they could forever enflame tensions between CA and TX like they do with Ukraine and Russia. Sticking together is still the best policy imo.
The Q-rean War
Along the same lines: The Second War for Independence.
Let’s see if the HBO doc has the balls to include this detail.
He’s also from a family that dates back to when Manhattan was occupied by Indians.
I’ve always been wary of those types of families. He’s not some average Joe like they make him out to be.
In hindsight, I think the Obama birth cert thing was a way of showing, to those smart enough to recognize the implications, that they had “conquered” the US.
Just think, if foreign invaders had come in like it was Red Dawn and hoisted the Soviet flag over the White House, every American would know exactly what to do. They’d be entirely unified against them. Pull a more subtle coup like Obama, and no one knows what to do about it. And in this day and age, you wouldn’t have to militarily occupy a country, just place impostors in key positions of power.
I also think this is why Kamala was chosen to be the one waiting in the wings when Biden steps down for medical reasons. An illegitimate President signals to the rest of the world that the US is back under the control of globalist interests, and demoralizes those who hold dear the Constitution.
I agree that easing restrictions now, just in time for the vaccinated to perform their role as the real super spreaders, makes sense.
However, if that’s the case, then the timing of current events makes more sense. If they’d let people take off the masks 2 months ago when only 10% of people had gotten their shots, they couldn’t claim the “vaccines” were effective. And with less restrictions, fewer people would be motivated to get their shots. Then there’d be fewer people to spread the bioweapon when they start to come out of their caves when the weather gets nice.