I understand the implications, but if we really want to explore this, how do we know Trump actually researched it and/or posted it? It's common practice for celebrities and politicians to have someone manage their social media posts. A random guy on his team could be doing this to "troll the qtards" as it were.
Not saying I believe this, but a good claim needs to stand up against a good steel man argument. Generally, a lot of the "proofs" I see on here are lacking anything substantive.
I was partly confused by all of this, but now I wonder. Was this actually the play?
Dems are drowning everywhere, the Titanic has been struck. COVID failed. Ukraine failed. Monkeypox failed. EVERYTHING IS FAILING.
So imagine a desperate Dem: I know! Let's get Trump back in the spotlight! We can call him divisive and make him the point of the midterms, right? Did the trick in 2020, didn't it?
Now look at this disaster. Watergate+ and it will be relatively fresh in the memories of many when midterms roll out. Now he's fundraising MORE and his base is even more motivated and united. Plus their own are even criticizing it.
This is what stepping on a landmine politically must look like in real time.
Devil's advocate for this one:
If you want to make a "proof" simply look through the posts, find one you like and then post with the appropriate time or date. This simply requires finding said post and waiting either a day or at most a year.
Viola! You're totally legit now!
I suspect we're at the metaphorical point where their plane is nosediving and they're just realizing it won't pull up and all of the buttons and levers are useless.
If that were the case, with all the constant narrative changes lately and now this, it may very well be the death throes of their movement. All they have left is lashing out in vulgar ways, but we'll see how well that works pretty soon.
Given how much keeps happening this year and how quickly it seems to be accelerating, I also suspect midterms will truly be historical this year, one way or another. Definitely before the end of the year, that I'm sure of.
Good answer.
Only add-on is that there's gait fingerprinting now. In other words, the literal way you walk is identifiable without things like a face. You probably knew this, but others may not.
Agreed. Grow that spine and stand up for others in the moment.
An attack on one is an attack on all. No more debate with these liars.
Help a pede when he gets attacked. Help a pede rebuild when we can't prevent the damage. That simple.
Truthfully, they fear us. Which is odd because we've been so nice to them their entire lives. We don't raid their offices, harass them in the streets, or any of the nasty stuff they do to us.
But I guess that's the point, they know they deserve to be treated poorly, but they're so caught up in themselves they can't help but have that perpetual panic over it. This is why they're so sensitive. They know pain is coming. They just don't know when.
Any insight on some of these extra tracking methods or just letting paranoia do the thinking here?
Figure that'd be something worth sharing if you're looking to help.
Only option would be to mess with hardware and maybe fudge the antenna (if there is one) so it won't work. If the whole wifi bit is disabled/removed, there may very well be a killswitch built to kill the whole device (thus forcing it's presence).
Even basic phones still use cell towers. Those pings to the towers are kept and patterns are derived from that data.
In other words: if a phone keeps pinging towers that triangulate to near your residence every time you're home, good luck convincing the inquisitors it's not you.
Why would this matter if they can just brazenly cheat like in 2020 though? This would be an unnecessarily risky move, imo.
Taking heat like this, while everything else is already looking bad for them. I'm getting post-2016 election vibes right now.
I genuinely wonder if the dam is about to burst and something is about to happen. Too eerie otherwise.
If this is true, then the question for me becomes:
What is Clinton so afraid of coming out?
Think about it. We know the email servers, her husband's prestigious career as a sexual predator, as well as countless other scandals like Benghazi. She laughs about these things as the media covers for her.
What would scare her so much that she would call in a favor to have a judge RAID a former president like this? That's what I'm not understanding here.
Perhaps it's simply optics to distract from a lot of things. That's still a sloppy mess though. This post would suggest something serious is potentially in the works.
WHAT IS SHE TRYING TO HIDE.
The entirety of the civilized world. Just so we're clear.
Dem barbarians can go hike off a cliff for all I care at this point.
My timeline may be off, but in the past month, he's had:
- Self-proclaimed cancer diagnosis (current, not past)
- Weird videos of himself not blinking and general fuckery with his appearance (although most examples appear to be lighting and angles imo).
- Multiple COVID "tests" popping off the day after he reveals he has cancer
All while China is sabre-rattling over Pelosi who appears to be blatantly insider trading again while also visiting Taiwan despite Chinese threats?
Feels like a distraction, honestly, but time will tell. If they're playing hide the cookie over the POTUS of all things, they must be running out of good cards. Something may very well be about to break.
He does have moments of agitation where he coldly attacks someone. Guy is aggressive as fuck, but does well hiding it normally.
Someone tell ya that too?
Migration is a much more complicated topic and mass migration is a relatively recent development in the context of the original post. There has always been migration and didn't cause nearly as much trouble before.
I would argue that managed and minimal migration was healthy and productive, but the mass migration we're seeing is ultimately destructive to the issues mentioned. Oversimplified, if we receive "bad people" instead of "good people" it only worsens the issue the original post highlighted. Think of it as pouring fuel on the fire.
If I had to guess, it's a heavy-handed attempt to force the issue because each time they try to "force" a cultural change on us, we bounce back. The era of wars from WWI to Reagan? Started recovering and even impeached Clinton. 9/11 and Obama? Already got Trump and the MAGA movement immediately afterwards. COVID19 forced lockdowns and mandates on us? Not even 3 years later and people are largely over it. The recovery period is shrinking each time.
In other words, our societal "immune system" is getting more and more adept at rejecting these forces, so they force even more, but each time they experience diminishing returns. This is why they're so focused on 2030-2035 right now. They're nearing a precipice and that may be their last chance, not their original goal. After all, these are extremely long term strategic thinkers. Assigning a fixed year goal is odd if they're doing well. They'll just let it happen "naturally" otherwise.
Ironically, if we receive too many "good people" from mass migration, it helps us here and could be a factor in undermining them. Turnabout is fair play after all.
Bringing in mass foreigners while forcing a food shortage could also create an international shit show and possibly force a hard civil war of sorts. Maybe it's a "burn it all down" response form petulant parasites. Hard to say, but I see the potential.
TLDR: there's a LOT going on with migration and the current state of things so I felt it should be explored as its own post.
It's about growth, not mitigation.
In other words, don't try to beat down your opponent per se. Simply grow your own movement to exceed theirs while they stagnate.
If we protect our children, of which there are many, and minimize their ability to reproduce through indoctrination, hormonal therapy, sodomy, etc., we win by default. It's really that simple.
If anything, I wouldn't be surprised if white hats pushed the more extreme elements of the left to make them self-destruct in this fashion. Never said it would be all clean, after all.
The evil we are fighting is deceptive in nature. Of course it's going to look miserable and unwinnable before total victory.
It will start not with a bang but with a memory.
One day you will recall how things "used to be" with regards to all of this. We'll reflect on the insanity of all the SJW/Woke BS and how it "doesn't really happen anymore." You'll notice that there just aren't as many problems plaguing society either. Less negative news. Less to be stressed about. Money is good. Family is good. World is generally better. These days will slowly fade like a bad nightmare.
And remember that just because the West's leadership is compromised and not playing this up that the rest of the world isn't still in play. Sometimes you just have to build up to the "final boss" as it were and start out in the less satisfying areas, solving problems and building up. We're on a good trajectory with this.
Honestly, the problem is that we protect the worst in society from themselves. Then when they prosper and multiply we wonder how this could have happened.
Wouldn't this be excellent evidence against Disney in court?
How can one argue that this is an important issue for them when they openly and gleefully do business with other countries that are far MORE strict about their business interactions with Disney? This should show that their entire argument is inherently disingenuous and should be thrown out as fraud against the courts, in my opinion.
The woke who cried pandemic.
If memory serves, the whole "vaccines stopped polio" narrative is a straight up lie and the numbers were going down once people started implementing basic hygienic practices to avoid it.
Now that I think about it, who was allegedly most at risk for COVID? Fat, sickly, and old people (kinda like Congress and old banker types, eh?).
Who's most at risk for monkeypox as it currently stands? Degenerates.
If we assume the "cabal" is primarily composed of these two demographics, is it any surprise they're losing their shit over it? Meanwhile, if food gives normal people cancer, they don't even bat an eye because they're probably not eating that garbage anyways.
In other words, it may not necessarily be that they're screeching about COVID/Monkeypox primarily because of lockdowns/fear/control, those are just the "extra benefits" of pushing it. If this were the case, it would have greatly optimistic implications for us since it's a very defensive and reactionary stance on their part (which is BAD for them).
I should probably make a post on this, but all of the pieces seem like they're finally "clicking" into place for me lately. As silly as it sounds, it almost feels like being able to read the code in the matrix. Bottom line on that: we are definitely winning right now.
Why does the Post Office need millions of rounds of ammo? Seems the gov does a lot of things that raise eyebrows these days.
Let's just torch the whole damn curtain and let the chips fall where they may.