11
wideawakeuk 11 points ago +12 / -1

Good info. Wonder if they sat on that virus announcement 'til 33.

Also, she referenced a 'toad in her nose' in relation to the virus.

Toads, considered 'more terrestrial' than frogs, also covered in warts (see disease comms below).

A toad in one's nose could be referred to as a 'blockage'.

Was this an early comm lining up 'clearing a blockage' (along with others that the decodingsymbols guy did in relation to 'cake parties'- the actual clearing of said blockage through viral means)

If that all ties in, it is dark indeed.

16
wideawakeuk 16 points ago +16 / -0

famously voiced by a Rothschild.

Betty literally speaking with the Rothchild's voice. A comm within a comm.

Nice work fren, good to see it all laid out like this, very consumable.

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, Dir or Same? Or Xir or Xame most likely...

Agreed, likely not practically protective, but indicative of better treatment. I wonder what other privileges it grants that I'm missing, there's likely 'benefits' we aren't privy to. Emergency situations- imagine a Monarch in hiding- who would surround/protect her?

As far as honours for serving in civil service offices, I think it's just a vow of silence, they may as well initiate them into Trappist orders.

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

ThanQ fren, appreciate the time and efforts you put into this, some encouraging news in the UK!

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if that's a WH tempter, shake a few more panicky donors out of the long grass.

5
wideawakeuk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nice to have a handy list. Kind of them to flag criminals.

Also, just posted this elsewhere (which is why I think they've done it):

Sounds like a protection move to me:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight

When knights were taken as prisoners of war, they were customarily held for ransom in somewhat comfortable surroundings. This same standard of conduct did not apply to non-knights (archers, peasants, foot-soldiers, etc.) who were often slaughtered after capture. (etc etc)

Knights are afforded better treatment.

Honours include:

https://news.sky.com/story/new-year-honours-list-whitty-and-van-tam-knighted-as-scientists-honoured-for-battle-against-covid-12506926

England's chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty and his deputy Professor Jonathan Van-Tam have been given knighthoods, along with the chief medical officers for Wales, Dr Frank Atherton, and Scotland, Dr Gregor Smith.

There are also damehoods for Dr Jenny Harries, who leads the UK Health Security Agency, and Dr June Raine, chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

Funny how all those involved in the 'health response' front line just got protected.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like a protection move to me:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight

When knights were taken as prisoners of war, they were customarily held for ransom in somewhat comfortable surroundings. This same standard of conduct did not apply to non-knights (archers, peasants, foot-soldiers, etc.) who were often slaughtered after capture. (etc etc)

Knights are afforded better treatment.

Honours include:

https://news.sky.com/story/new-year-honours-list-whitty-and-van-tam-knighted-as-scientists-honoured-for-battle-against-covid-12506926

England's chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty and his deputy Professor Jonathan Van-Tam have been given knighthoods, along with the chief medical officers for Wales, Dr Frank Atherton, and Scotland, Dr Gregor Smith.

There are also damehoods for Dr Jenny Harries, who leads the UK Health Security Agency, and Dr June Raine, chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

Funny how all those involved in the 'health response' front line just got protected.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which is directly why we are in this mess (and I say that with direct family members with the same opinions). They need to know (in a preferably non-damaging way) what happened when they refused to look into the dark corners of the world. They looked away, and now their children must bear it. The very least they must offer is acceptance of truth as fact and a necessity to act.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Africa's important for some reason. Charles, Di, William and Harry (and the Spencers) have spent a lot of time there and continue to do so.

Pre-1997 (crash), Diana was (I think) sending comms that she knew what might happen. She spent time close to lepers and AIDS suffers (constantly close to sick people) and then went strolling through the landmine fields of Angola (navigating a mine field).

Spencer, Di, William and Harry were in S Africa at Spencer's home in March 1997.

Spencer: ''I am proud of the fact apart from when she was on display meeting President Mandela we managed to contrive to stop the ever-present paparazzi from getting a single picture of her -- that meant a lot to her''

Sounds secretive.

Mandela also said to kiss her (for him) would be treason- because she's a Princess or because she wasn't DS?

There were oddities about the funeral and the actions of other royals after, but Spencer, William and Harry went to Africa afterwards to duck the media storm. They say nobody recognises them there (which would be odd).

Spencer has referred several times to Diana resting in 'an oasis of calm'. There are several such place names in S Africa, one in Prince Albert, SA.

I'm not anywhere near sure, but I've seen odd comms implying things may not have happened exactly as they were reported at the time, and even still ponder from time if she, like the Norwegian Blue, may just be 'resting'- maybe even helping. Likely fantasy, but it's one that keeps cropping up- each time I dismiss it another suspect headline story turn up.

This one's got odd details (Chirac's wife there?)

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/dianas-driver-i-stop-ghouls-11050056

Harry mentions a head injury in that article, in this similar one it doesn't seem so bad...

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/french-officials-queued-up-see-24378071

Oh and there's this interesting aside: (note the kid's appearances)

This statue: https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.013b8fb9099bd09edcbe9768cd6fb9d6?rik=MOFc6cfZoJMN%2fw&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

Is eerily reminiscent of this one: https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.7gJGUAACnfPQuABq7PrhwwHaEK?pid=ImgDet&rs=1

5
wideawakeuk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe the deliverer of this message is worried he may be the future medium with which to send Jizzly a message (if you catch my drift).

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's some great connecting nuggets.

I was browsing (a bit of) of the decoding symbols on Edward viii / Einstein etc

I think He also tagged together his eventual burial at Frogmore (the only sovereign not buried in the Kings and Queen's traditional spot, a slight).

That brought to mind the Queen moving Harry and Meghan into Frgmore cottage- was that a similar slight? Sent to Frogmore the modern day equivalent of being 'sent to Coventry'?

If they use frogs as a way of slighting someone, imagine what it does to them having millions of them watching their demise. If that's a conscious White Hat turnaround then it's deee-lish.

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was just explaining that concept to someone- the death announcements delays etc. Sometimes for a fortuitous outcome, sometimes a significant date. RBG is a great example.

I'd find it hard to pick a date from those, some interesting possibilities though and I think you're right about it being discreet (plenty of public interest in satanic dates atm!).

That's pretty much as I'd interpreted the comms too (there's been lots more, but sort of opaque, juxtapositions like Drudge etc).

It'd be so fascinating to know what kind of detail makes up the 40%- I know it has to be a certain way (and to be fair, if we can learn to read comms history we can already know what we want for interest's sake), but I'd love to know what kind of level we go up to publicly on disclosure.

While we're on the royals, I just dropped this in the comments on a different post too:

Just found another oddity while browsing:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/viewers-slam-netflix-for-distasteful-joke-on-prince-philip-s-death/ar-AAScr0M?ocid=msedgntp

Wording: ''withdraws from public life permanently, by dying.''

Today in the news, 'high winds' close the Castle to the public:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/edinburgh-castle-capital-tourist-attraction-closes-due-to-high-winds-making-it-unsafe/ar-AASkUhh?ocid=msedgntp

I wonder if Q is going to huff and puff and blow the castle down.

Or if it's Castle Clean (https://qposts.online/?q=3782&s=postnum) or Castle Lock (https://qposts.online/?q=3782&s=postnum).

Side note: it was also the castle 'attempted' to be recently seized by Magna Carta Rules.

Soooooo many connections everywhere!!

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

The 'retiring from public life' in relation to Phil may mean just that, the wording/timing looked important tied in with the castle closure. Has he drawn up the bridge? Public death announcement may not mean reality matches, it can be metaphorical I think (comms)

The mafia lady I think is really dead, the wording of the article implies it, I thought it may tie in with the Fulford article, that's all. Lots of 86's about in high places at the moment though.

6
wideawakeuk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just found another oddity while browsing:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/viewers-slam-netflix-for-distasteful-joke-on-prince-philip-s-death/ar-AAScr0M?ocid=msedgntp

Wording: ''withdraws from public life permanently, by dying.''

Today in the news, 'high winds' close the Castle to the public:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/edinburgh-castle-capital-tourist-attraction-closes-due-to-high-winds-making-it-unsafe/ar-AASkUhh?ocid=msedgntp

I wonder if Q is going to huff and puff and blow the castle down.

Or if it's Castle Clean (https://qposts.online/?q=3782&s=postnum) or Castle Lock (https://qposts.online/?q=3782&s=postnum).

Side note: it was also the castle 'attempted' to be recently seized by Magna Carta Rules.

9
wideawakeuk 9 points ago +9 / -0

Perhaps they are thinking of being indelicate with the rapier.

Also, I wonder if any other relevant 'protections' are afforded to knights. Not immunity, but something honour related, like a choice of dispatch. Modern miséricorde perhaps.

14
wideawakeuk 14 points ago +14 / -0

At 2.50, he says ''We have a lot of help right now, and we haven't had that help for that long....'' .... ''can't talk much about it...'' etc

3.05, pause it and look at his bracelet as he scratches his nose.

WWG1WGA

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks fren, a feasible prediction then. How unusual! I think I need a lie down.

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now, I don't usually even read these, but yesterday this was reported, she was 86 (86'd?). Died at home (the old mafia adage of 'surrounded by one's family?')

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/31/she-understood-her-power-the-death-of-mafia-boss-pupetta-maresca

So there's that. But given a week's news headlines and a good geopolitical general knowledge many of us could spin a tale like this. D'you know when Fulford published this article? If it was before the news broke yesterday he either has contacts or reads comms better than most...

by BQnita
8
wideawakeuk 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ah, yes, but they're genocidal maniacs. And liars, yes. Lying is bad too, but I'm more concerned about the genocide.

by BQnita
8
wideawakeuk 8 points ago +8 / -0

There are 9 pages of possible adverse events.

By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.

Doesn't sound safe to me.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›