Comms Decode: Queen Elizabeth, Betty White, Snow White, and Betty Boop
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Excellent decodes. My intuition always told me that King Edward abdication had something to do with Elizabeth's ascension, but never bothered to dig deep.
BTW, Betty White started her career at the same time QE ascended. I have a strong suspicion that Betty White's death coincides with QE's official death announcement (I think we all know she is already dead).
Is this the beginning of the end?
Okay so there is something interesting I came across watching old Betty Boop cartoons. Take a look at this episode in 1933:
https://youtu.be/SI702KkWrD8?t=133
She is sneezing and describing her flu symptoms. 1933 is also when they first virus was isolated in humans, leading to the whole study of virology: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(00)78541-2/fulltext
Not sure if related, but surely interesting.
Good info. Wonder if they sat on that virus announcement 'til 33.
Also, she referenced a 'toad in her nose' in relation to the virus.
Toads, considered 'more terrestrial' than frogs, also covered in warts (see disease comms below).
A toad in one's nose could be referred to as a 'blockage'.
Was this an early comm lining up 'clearing a blockage' (along with others that the decodingsymbols guy did in relation to 'cake parties'- the actual clearing of said blockage through viral means)
If that all ties in, it is dark indeed.
Or perhaps toad with warts is the early depiction if virus with spikes? (Every virus has the spikey appearence even though they seem to make it sound sars is somehow unique with spike. Check depictions of HIV from 80s)
The Lancet is Rockefeller funded and has lied about many things and publish science articles they know are written by the drug companies themselves and a bung to a professor to put his name to it. They have never isolated a virus. It's not possible
The notable stuff here is the comms
Good eye. Wouldn't have said this two years ago, but now I have a hard time NOT believing you're 100% on the sneezing comms.
I think once enough anons learn fully how to read symbolism, we can go back and scour through historical news articles and archives and piece together the real history of our world. Its all out there, we just need to know how to see it and connect it.
The WordPress symbols decoder guy goes more in depth on the abdication of king Edward. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/11/30/abdication-of-kings-einstein-to-aids/ It fits very well with the symbolism of Betty Boop. Although looking up Bessie Wallis Simpson, the divorcee that took Edward off the throne, I'm wondering if Betty Boop symbolizes her more than the queen.
Look for QE 2 to die 17 days before her Platinum Jubilee ( 70th year on throne ).
It does look that way. Betty White dies on 12/31. 31 mirrors to 13. She was going to have this HUGE party that a bunch of celebs had planned to attend on her 100th birthday, but she dies 17 days before it.
Queen Elizabeth is supposed to have a MASSIVE celebration for her 70th year on the throne. 17 days before 2/6 is January 20th. That's also the date that US presidents are inaugurated. It's weird that it just so happens that those two dates (her coronation as Queen and US presidents inaugurated) are separated by 17 days.
...it's also the one year delta of a ' foreign occupation ' of DC as described in the Law of War
holy cow! SUPRA! IAN! Yall are BRILLIANT!
And they decided to hold Betty White's party anyway, as though she is still alive. That weirds me out. Not sure about the queen stuff but the Betty White party is weird to me. She just died.
Wow, Nice catch
Random.
Betty literally speaking with the Rothchild's voice. A comm within a comm.
Nice work fren, good to see it all laid out like this, very consumable.
These people are sick
Help me what did betty white do?
Alright, alright, alright.
First of all, this is GREAT. I've never seen anything close to this in the world of Betty Boop comms, which is something I've had a particular interest in because of the OBVIOUS connection to pedophilia. The "little girl voice", in connection with psychoanalyzing troubled, broken young women has, I'd estimate conservatively a 95% hit rate with childhood sexual trauma. One of my earliest and biggest influences in studying sexual abuse, Dr. Drew Pinski, has basically codified it in his work. It's as close to "accepted fact" as a skeptical person such as myself possesses. But I digress.
As u/wideawakeuk points out, and I think OP further proves, Betty Boop is comms within comms. Commsception, frankly. In fact I think this dig is so big, OP might have unwittingly found a huge part of the meaning of both SNOW WHITE and ALICE IN WONDERLAND and how this web is woven. I suspect we still need more digging into the film Snow White. My own research stalled on that in favor of the more approachable Godfather 3 - which I don't regret. But I suspect there's levels of esoteric, occult Satanism also deeply encoded into the whole Snow White, Betty Boop, Alice in Wonderland megacomm.
I'm rambling here, but this is really jogging my noggin, and in retrospect (news unlocks the map) Betty White is incredibly suspect. Much to say, but no time to analyze and articulate it right here and now.... So I'll leave everyone with some crumbs I'm gnawing on.
First, the very obviously connected work of DecodingSymbols found here
Second, and more difficult to explain, but definitely a link I feel VERY strongly about, but which has been expertly "disguised" by David Lynch over his entire ouevre, the following clip from Mulholland Drive - a film, ultimately about Ritual Satanic Sacrifice in Hollywood and WHO is Behind The Scenes. Quick thoughts about the scene, which has very little context unless one has really analyzed the Lynch corpus (disguised by the master magician) - it turns out these two are responsible for the entirety of the deception, manipulation and horror depicted in the film. And they're presented as bit players, even Good Guys, except when considered in the entire context of his work, OR if you're able to spot sharks in the water. HINT: freeze frame on the grins. Lynch makes no mistakes, especially in casting. Look at those teeth.
Tldr I might now suspect they represent The Royals and it's kind of blowing my mind.
Anyway Semper, I'd really like you to contact DecodingSymbols and share this work with him. A++++
That Mulholland Drive scene is definitely a nod- I'd have said you got their desired comm spot on. That visual is haunting and I haven't even watched the rest.
Worth bearing in mind that although they're the main characters causing chaos, in real life and film they have a Director. In this case the real director (Rots) is hiding behind the cast (the public face). What would happen to the front people (cast) and crucially not the puppeteer (director) if they were ever caught. It might look a little like a 'Lynch' Mob. (A lynch pin to direct a lynching?)
The voice/trauma connection is very interesting, I had never heard of that before.
You're right, there is much further to go with this, so many avenues.
Once the initial Wonderland/Snow White comms had been planted, it seems the nomenclature of these films was then used for subsequent comms of differing but similarly connected events and plans. Pull on enough loose strings... we may get a bit more of a picture or 'unlock the map'.
I realize now that in movies, TV shows, and articles about Elizabeth I she is also being used as a "snow white" comm (Remember how much movies always emphasize her "snow white" make up to the point that she looks like a clown). You wouldn't want to just use the character Snow White, but multiple forms of it. Betty Boop was cast as "Snow White" in what is considered a classic of animated film.
Synonyms of the original comm were developed and expanded on over time.
Words are the same.
You take the word "jump" and you have other words for it like "leap", "bound", "skip" , "spring" ect.
I think they do that with comms.
I did not know that Betty Boop is supposed to be a child, until reading this.
I had never heard that! Wow. It makes an original painting I had of her by the artist that much more disturbing!!! I left it with a friend when I moved, and he passed away. I'll have to check with his wife to see if she still has it.
I feel bad about calling nothingburger on this because SemperSupra obviously put in a lot of work. When I read it I only thought "so what."
When I was a kid I never heard Queen Elizabeth II referred to as Bess, Betty, or Betsy. It's true that people named Elizabeth often do acquire this soubriquet but I never heard it applied to the UK Queen. During the last twenty years her most famous pet name has been the one used in a semi-derogatory way by Private Eye magazine who frequently called her "Brenda." Brenda is yet another of the traditional manglings of "Elizabeth."
I don't understand the meaning of the double-ended red arrow picture. It seems to say that Elizabeth I coronation outfit was somewhat similar to that of Elizabeth II. Of course, why would it not be?
"However in 1953 they needed a new comm for Queen Elizabeth." For what reason and what evidence for that?
Not saying there was nothing funny going on with Rothschilds in Hollywood and Betty White being Barbara's sister and all. I am sure there was. Just don't see the UK Queen connection at all.
There isn't a direct connection. Look for connections between the two people forming the comm and you'll always miss the interpretation. The very idea of symbol comms is that they don't spell out what is being done nor connect the people, plausible deniability is paramount.
The people who know the context of these would not find them confusing to interpret, they know the inside story and take their context from that. They know the history of the comms in place. And they're meant to be weird- some of the most outrageously stupid comms have been used for events of importance. Just another way of laughing at us.
Bess is just an example of nickname like Betty is a nickname of Elizabeth.
Elizabeth I is associated with snow white skin. She is always depicted with white clownish make up caked on. It's a famous association.
It's how the comm is set up.
Elizabeth II is then compared to her and how they are so alike. Now you're setting up the association.
The people involved in a plot to install their chosen puppet on the British Throne did not want to openly talk about it. If your message gets intercepted it could spell doom. What they're discussing is treason. You develop comms to talk about the illegal stuff while maintaining plausible deniability.
Instead of talking about wanting to ensure that Princess Elizabeth becomes Queen you give her a code name. You can't send a message saying "Elizabeth's code name is Snow White". If your code is broken or that message is found then you've been caught in an act of treason. Instead you time things in a way to create the association without it being too obvious.
Comms are very hard for normies. Heck, even most anons couldn't figure out Q comms. Even anons get stumped by them.
Q tried to send the comm "Babies on Floor, hands in mouth" and it took an anon forever to realize the comm was for "Syria".
I made a post on it. Q posted a picture of a palm tree and asked what is it. Anons struggled to realize "plant" and that plant has the double meaning of a "spy".
Q said "plants need water" (Spies need info). Q said "learn our comms", but there are still many anons who struggle with the idea. Comms are very hard because it requires abstract thinking to make the connection.
You need to create a way to talk about something clandestine (classified or dangerous to openly discuss) without it being obvious what you are doing. That is the nature of the comm.
For example, say you want to discuss a plot to assassinate a US president like JFK, you can talk through comms. Openly discussing that plot in public is dangerous. You need to keep plausible deniability.
Why do you think the released emails from Tony Podesta talked about "pizza"? Even though they HRC's emails got exposed they could deny stuff because they had talked in code. They talked about "pizza" instead of kids.
That's why they denied, denied, denied on Pizzagate.
Normies look and go, "So what? They're talking about REALLY expensive pizza. Seems like a nothingburger to me."
Do you see how they get away with their crimes by using comms? If you can't understand their comms you won't recognize their crimes.
"Babies on Floor, hands in mouth"
How did you get to Syria from that?
Where are the date fags at? Will we be seeing a new pope and Queen?
The date's will be significant.
Possible comms in the Betty White death meme perpetuated over the last decade? Started in 2014 according to KnowYourMeme.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/internet-death-hoaxes
Very nice, fren. Very thought provoking.
Have you considered that Betty Boop might represent not the queen, but rather Bessie Wallis Simpson, the lady that King Edward abdicated to marry? The physical similarity between them is notable, and her being voiced by a Rothschild fits perfectly with the "conquest by marriage" m.o. of the cabal. Take a look. The pictures do a good job, but the Wikipedia article detailing her affairs with connected people make her appear like a true cabal player. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallis_Simpson Interesting, though not conclusive, that her mother also had a child out of wedlock by a rich merchant (who she married) and then went on to marry into a politician's family.
Always thought the new found Betty White worship was so strange. She was trotted out again for a reason.This makes sense as to the purpose of bringing her back.
They are going to release the film of Betty and celebrate as if she were still alive. I believe this is confirming that ol Bess kicked the bucket and to prepare for a new phase.
Will it be William? Or if they all perish in a plane crash, who then is next in line? Harry was essentially banished. Or was he?
Well why don't we critique the contents of what is presented rather than dispute its tact? Its all theory here.
Then just dismiss every word in every Q drop then...
Such a dumb reddit quote right up there with "private business can censor anyone and that's a good thing" or "correlation doesn't equal causation."
Smarmy dismissive faggotry.
That is a very fine combination of words and I intend to insert that trio into every conversation henceforth.
You know what would happen if their plans were all openly discussed?
Of course there's no 'evidence', it's plausibly deniable then, they aren't going to 'in-your-face' tell you.
What do you expect from a decades old communication designed to evade detection and evolve? Multiple branches, back up comms etc.
As for the structure of the above post, people might be being careful with spelling out certain things, here and anywhere else. Think implication.
If they don't believe in comms, then they must believe that all that odd talk about expensive pizza and hamburgers in the leaked emails with Tony Podesta were just that. Really bizarre and strangely worded discussions on outrageously prized pizza and hamburgers.
Even the FBI released years ago that pedophiles are known to use coded words (comms) to talk about kids. Cheese pizza is for a little girl.
We know criminals use coded language to talk about crimes.
That's why Q tried to teach comms to us, but Q could only openly tell a few like "plants need water".
The DS couldn't openly talk about a plot to install a puppet on the British Throne. They needed comms to coordinate across the ocean. How do you talk to each in the 1930s? There was no email.
Think of how hard it was to travel back then and talk to each other. Do you want to send an overseas letter that directly state, "Hey let's install Princess Elizabeth on the throne in 1952!"
It'd be treason if they were caught. That's why they developed comms. If the letter is caught just deny and say "I was talking about Snow White! I'm a big fan! You're crazy!" How do you prove what they really meant? They'll just gaslight. Just like how they did when the emails with Tony Podesta leaked.
They've been doing it in cipher and code at least since John Dee for the Original Lizzy (possibly before that too, but Walsingham / Cecil era spy masters are the earliest era I'm familiar with, gotta do a deep dive when there's less priorities).
Printing presses, leaflets and paper political propaganda all later developments of the comms system. Portraits I'm sure used to be sent with messages in them to prospective suitors (Holbein etc) for details too sensitive to entrust.
In short, they've had a lot of practice making anyone who intercepts a message sound like an absolute dribbling moron.
I'm perfectly capable of being a moron by myself thank you cabal, no help required. /s
Love your work fren, always a pleasure to read.
Yup.
Imagine pointing a magazine article talking about the new Disney snow white movie and saying, "They are discussing treason and a plot to install Elizabeth as queen."
You'd be looked at like a nutcase. No one would believe you. In the movie Rosemary's Baby that's exactly what happens to the character Rosemary after the decodes the satanists' comms and tries to go and get help. Everyone just sees her as the crazy one.
"So what? It's a nothingburger."
Polanksi was one big satanist (look at his movie) but he knew what he was doing when he made that movie. He pretty much showed how you hide the truth in plain sight.
I figure they've got they're own history in vaults somewhere- be interesting to get a glimpse.
As you say, they're so cunning at hiding in plain sight, using proxy religions and groups to 'clean-skin' themselves once tarnished and set up another future scapegoat and victim (for their next cover) with their Judas goats leading us all in.
I must say I find it liberating to be thought insane by people who are struggling to understand how we even got in this mess. ''Insanity is the only sane reaction to an insane society.''
It was hard for Q to wake even anons to the idea of comms.
Honest people are not skilled at lying to hide serious crimes. Sure, they might lie to get out of a day of work, but they don't know how to lie to get away with murder. They don't get even the idea of fabricating an entire coded language just to talk about secrets without getting caught.
We DON'T do that. We don't have a reason to do that. To an honest person it doesn't make sense.
To defeat the criminals, the white hats had to learn how to use their comms against them.
60% of what happens will remain classified. The only way to really know what happened with that 60% will be through comms. Major comms were flying across the Drudge Report during the Maxwell trial. Lots went down.
However, if you're non-comms aware you'll just be going, "Nothing's happening. I'm confused. Why does Trump say weird things? Why is there a weird article about fossils and astroids? Huh? What's going on?"
So frustrating to see those comments- I try and spend a bit of time aiding those that can't get their head around it, but you're right- it's hard because it isn't instinctive to the average mind (even when they realise how much they've been lied to and how deep this goes).
To me it seems like a natural progression, if you are criminal and society isn't then you'll stand out, you must have your own comms system or fail. They've always had to hide to accomplish their goals because they know they'd be rejected by anyone with a shred of morality.
I've had some great convos with normies on news stories- Geronimo the Alpaca was my favourite - nobody could give any explanation as to why an Alpaca with TB had caught the nation's heart. (Recap below if required)
https://archive.fo/wip/0BtoZ (BBC so archived, no clickees for you BBC)
I'm still not anywhere certain of the comm, but maybe linked to Assange- seen them juxtaposed 'Drudge-style' in placement comms but never figured it out. This article links the two without really saying anything.
https://cornishdamoorg.wordpress.com/2021/08/12/assange-vs-alpaca-a-tale-of-two-leaders/
The main point being that when the DS gets frantic and panicky and rushes the line-up comms or does a media blitzkrieg, stories and headlines finally get so bizarre that not even our resident 'muh, comms' crew can deny something fishy going on.
They're the ones I wait for (the throat rammers!), though with the way you lay things out so succinctly when you do the graphics I fail to understand how some can't even entertain the idea of comms. I guess it's willful ignorance (the implications are too much, self protection, cranio-rectal insertion etc)- lots of that going around.