We saw a huge military jet flying 2 or 300 feet off the ground in East tn last week. Was a quarter mile away. Never did hear it. Looked up and counted 9 or so contrails.
Been noticing several of this have been appearing on fire falling out of the sky. Some ppl believe an Energy Directed laser from a satellite took out the AT&T building and then these start falling out of the sky.
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers?
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere?
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.
What do you think NASA has been doing since the 1980s? Their budgets are way bigger than their actual activity.
Maybe Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI debunked by media as an elaborate ruse against the Soviets was real? Starting to think anything CNN says is fake is probably real.
Good question. Very unclear at the moment. Pretty sure it is not coincidence it is happening now as a 300+ year old human enslavement cabal is being taken down.
That's true. Let's discuss that. Do you know what the atmospheric rate of absorption is for each wavelength of light is in the atmosphere? OK, that's a dick response from me, that's not fair. But it's different for every wavelength of light. Visible light is absorbed more readily than the higher wavelengths.. So, to reach earth with the max power geenerated, you need the higher wavelengths. But those wavelengths take more energy to generate. So as you describe how the target is destroyed, you're increasing your energy budget.
This energy must be generated/stored/released in orbit.
See where this is going? We have to have clues, indications, somewhat concrete descriptions of this tech, otherwise, it's just "beliefs." There are things we can deduce and know or require to understand to better understand this tech.
In my view, that is not an orbital vehicle burning up in our atmosphere. If I want to identify the spider I am getting out of my pool, I go look at pictures of spiders until I find one that look just like my spider. You will find no pictures, or videos, of satellites or any orbital object burning up like this is. First of all, any object that reenters earth atmosphere will mostly burn up in a higher altitude. The heat will be much more intense causing a white burn, and not a yellow flame.
This is something that was already in our atmosphere burning up.
I agree with your comment. The object is not burning up or breaking apart. It looks like high speed, controlled atmospheric re-entry of something quite large.
If there is no impact crater or splashdown site, then you know it was not shootdown.
How could media cover up a 1/4 mile diameter crater and associated blast? That looks like the minimum something that big intact to the ground would do.
I saw something on TDW yesterday similar. Except the fireball broke in two and started spiraling. Explanation was Space X staging but I didn't buy it. Strange happenings for sure.
Im not trying to take sides but there is a visible difference in what u just posted and what the original poster posted. U can see the suns reflection on the con trails in the video u posted and in the other video it appears something is burning they look completely different. Im not taking sides here because I have no dog in this fight. Oh and you sure are a negative one. You must be a real good time at parties just saying.
Let me explain something real quick - you don't "shoot down" something in orbit. Orbit, by definition, means that you are in free-fall. You don't need to keep the "engines on" once you are in orbit - it will just keep going. If something was destroyed in orbit - especially by laser, which would merely cause the target to burn - it will continue on in whatever orbit it had previously, but scattering debris that would potentially destroy thousands of other orbital assets.
Now, if you were able to decelerate an orbital asset by, say, attaching a thruster or hitting it with enough kinetic force to slow its velocity? It would drop from the sky as we might be seeing here, and avoid collateral damage. We're not looking at the work of directed energy weapons here. What we are probably seeing is an asset that can attach a small thruster tactically. Lasers are for raising temperature, little else.
Correct. It would not. Orbit is simply falling at an angle such that you miss the ground. It requires no force to maintain itself once set up (though that part takes IMMENSE force). Outside the atmosphere there is no air resistance, so no propulsion is necessary. Remember basic physics - an object in motion tends to stay in motion. A laser weapon is exactly the same as a laser pointer, just a lot more high intensity. You don't put any physical force on something with a weapon like that (ok, technically you do apply force with the photons bouncing off but it's so incredibly negligible that it only matters at the subatomic level unless you're looking at a timespan of days or weeks).
Moreover, MASERs (same as lasers but with microwave waves rather than light waves) are much more likely to be actually used judging by what is publicly known. Destruction of critical orbital infrastructure can be achieved by simply frying the electronics. No cleanup, no suspicion from anyone who wasn't already aware of the target, no debris falling from the sky.
If you're having trouble visualizing what I'm talking about, picture someone tossing a watermelon over your head towards a target behind you, and it gets shot mid-air. Someone hits it with a shotgun, and it'll splatter chunks all over you. Someone hits it with a laser/maser, and it still hits the target but it's on fire when it gets there.
Yes. However, you would not see something fall from the sky like this. As is mentioned elsewhere in this thread, it would burn most of its mass off before billowing into flames like this.
Directed energy weapons, as far as we know in the real world, are nothing at all like star wars blasters. It's like pointing a microwave oven at something. You don't shatter it, you zap it. Such would require sustained energy direction over minutes or hours, but the actual kinetic force (as opposed to the thermal force) is quite infinitesimal. That minor of an orbital decay would cause a satellite (or other orbiting asset) to hit atmo at a very shallow angle, and burn long before getting in range of cameras, let alone the naked eye.
I saw the same thing over Ohio 2 weeks ago an hour after sunset while driving. I was too slow in pulling over and setting up my camera. Also, wouldn’t this have crashed somewhere where someone would have noticed?
Even the cameraman thinks its just a plane. Too many people on here are drooling for UFOs and the shills know it so they post crap like this multiple times to divert attention from what matters. This is jet contrails lit up by early/late sunlight. https://youtu.be/FtAZNiCrUWA
starting around :27 seconds, looks like something drops off. Then you see a 2nd-stage kick in, and a booster-engine (perhaps) falls to the right. The 'rocket' continues, and the falling booster starts "puffing out" the last of it's propellant?
And, the falling booster is what's seen in the other video over WVa?
This looks like a possible intercept by anti-missile missile. Never seen one like this, though. Literally looked like a nuclear detonation in the upper atmosphere.
And how is that spotlight just hovering there? It’s like God is holding a flaslight or something.
That’s how rocket launches look in the upper atmosphere. The bright thing that falls away is the lower stage of a SpaceX rocket doing the boost back burn so that it will land itself back at the pad or on a drone ship.
I am tempted to think that these following sequence of events happened:
Trump team created a bait - by making DS believe that they are sending some important stuff to the Nashville site
Deep State launched a direct energy attack on that site
This exposed the satellite used for the attack
Space force took down that satellite.
This is the most fun answer therefore my mind will accept it as truth. Thanks!
Great amdnsumple.may be true doctor Occum
My kinda attitude ?
I like your speculation. Would be super cool if it turned out to be what happened.
We saw a huge military jet flying 2 or 300 feet off the ground in East tn last week. Was a quarter mile away. Never did hear it. Looked up and counted 9 or so contrails.
Would have been on Tuesday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHRtVzmQRZw
Been noticing several of this have been appearing on fire falling out of the sky. Some ppl believe an Energy Directed laser from a satellite took out the AT&T building and then these start falling out of the sky.
There are NO sats with lasers capable of hitting the Earth. None. Zero. Learn physics, people.
McDonnell Douglas was working on it 40 years ago. Please tell us more.
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
The only space-based DEWs are anti-sat.
.....you just described sunlight...
lmao
I'm crying ?
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.
That is kewl.
The only ones you know about.
What do you think NASA has been doing since the 1980s? Their budgets are way bigger than their actual activity.
Maybe Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI debunked by media as an elaborate ruse against the Soviets was real? Starting to think anything CNN says is fake is probably real.
Mmm, maybe all that gobbledygook should... Yield evidence for....? What?
Good question. Very unclear at the moment. Pretty sure it is not coincidence it is happening now as a 300+ year old human enslavement cabal is being taken down.
That's true. Let's discuss that. Do you know what the atmospheric rate of absorption is for each wavelength of light is in the atmosphere? OK, that's a dick response from me, that's not fair. But it's different for every wavelength of light. Visible light is absorbed more readily than the higher wavelengths.. So, to reach earth with the max power geenerated, you need the higher wavelengths. But those wavelengths take more energy to generate. So as you describe how the target is destroyed, you're increasing your energy budget.
This energy must be generated/stored/released in orbit.
See where this is going? We have to have clues, indications, somewhat concrete descriptions of this tech, otherwise, it's just "beliefs." There are things we can deduce and know or require to understand to better understand this tech.
Pot calling the kettel negro
That’s funny
In my view, that is not an orbital vehicle burning up in our atmosphere. If I want to identify the spider I am getting out of my pool, I go look at pictures of spiders until I find one that look just like my spider. You will find no pictures, or videos, of satellites or any orbital object burning up like this is. First of all, any object that reenters earth atmosphere will mostly burn up in a higher altitude. The heat will be much more intense causing a white burn, and not a yellow flame.
This is something that was already in our atmosphere burning up.
https://youtu.be/HUSZyu6O9wg
This x1000.
I was looking at this from your exact perspective.
This thing wasnt burning up, it was entering.
Can see symmetrical points of friction energy on both sides, with contrast point of center
I agree with your comment. The object is not burning up or breaking apart. It looks like high speed, controlled atmospheric re-entry of something quite large.
If there is no impact crater or splashdown site, then you know it was not shootdown.
How could media cover up a 1/4 mile diameter crater and associated blast? That looks like the minimum something that big intact to the ground would do.
Yea definitely not Jefferson Starship, or Aerosmith
I saw something on TDW yesterday similar. Except the fireball broke in two and started spiraling. Explanation was Space X staging but I didn't buy it. Strange happenings for sure.
this is contrails from a jet at high altitude
fake news
correct answer
Show me a similar example please.
Con stands for condensation- last I checked water doesnt burn
oh.. I'm sure it's a DEW satellite on re-entry after being shot down by the Space Force lol
retard on, faggot.
Admit it, you can’t find an example of contrail like this- because that’s not what this is.
I don’t think it’s a satellite. I don’t known what this is.
Just more rude remarks from rude shills.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHRtVzmQRZw
here ya go
it's a contrail, dopey.
now, shut up.
What a terrible video.
Im not trying to take sides but there is a visible difference in what u just posted and what the original poster posted. U can see the suns reflection on the con trails in the video u posted and in the other video it appears something is burning they look completely different. Im not taking sides here because I have no dog in this fight. Oh and you sure are a negative one. You must be a real good time at parties just saying.
Let me explain something real quick - you don't "shoot down" something in orbit. Orbit, by definition, means that you are in free-fall. You don't need to keep the "engines on" once you are in orbit - it will just keep going. If something was destroyed in orbit - especially by laser, which would merely cause the target to burn - it will continue on in whatever orbit it had previously, but scattering debris that would potentially destroy thousands of other orbital assets.
Now, if you were able to decelerate an orbital asset by, say, attaching a thruster or hitting it with enough kinetic force to slow its velocity? It would drop from the sky as we might be seeing here, and avoid collateral damage. We're not looking at the work of directed energy weapons here. What we are probably seeing is an asset that can attach a small thruster tactically. Lasers are for raising temperature, little else.
Correct. It would not. Orbit is simply falling at an angle such that you miss the ground. It requires no force to maintain itself once set up (though that part takes IMMENSE force). Outside the atmosphere there is no air resistance, so no propulsion is necessary. Remember basic physics - an object in motion tends to stay in motion. A laser weapon is exactly the same as a laser pointer, just a lot more high intensity. You don't put any physical force on something with a weapon like that (ok, technically you do apply force with the photons bouncing off but it's so incredibly negligible that it only matters at the subatomic level unless you're looking at a timespan of days or weeks).
Moreover, MASERs (same as lasers but with microwave waves rather than light waves) are much more likely to be actually used judging by what is publicly known. Destruction of critical orbital infrastructure can be achieved by simply frying the electronics. No cleanup, no suspicion from anyone who wasn't already aware of the target, no debris falling from the sky.
If you're having trouble visualizing what I'm talking about, picture someone tossing a watermelon over your head towards a target behind you, and it gets shot mid-air. Someone hits it with a shotgun, and it'll splatter chunks all over you. Someone hits it with a laser/maser, and it still hits the target but it's on fire when it gets there.
Yes. However, you would not see something fall from the sky like this. As is mentioned elsewhere in this thread, it would burn most of its mass off before billowing into flames like this.
Directed energy weapons, as far as we know in the real world, are nothing at all like star wars blasters. It's like pointing a microwave oven at something. You don't shatter it, you zap it. Such would require sustained energy direction over minutes or hours, but the actual kinetic force (as opposed to the thermal force) is quite infinitesimal. That minor of an orbital decay would cause a satellite (or other orbiting asset) to hit atmo at a very shallow angle, and burn long before getting in range of cameras, let alone the naked eye.
Bill Binney was tweeting about DEWs tonight.
American DEW satellites?? Implausible.
*Satellites
You broke your link. For anyone who wants to see the joke it's https://thedonald.win/p/11RNtUVw4G/west-virginia-ufo-mystery-solved/c/
Doesn't matter what we think. We'll never know the truth to this particular story.
BTW, falling debris from space doesn't slow down as it gets closer totnhe ground. Whatever was falling in these vids clearly slows down.
So, it was manned or controlled remotely somehow.
I saw the same thing over Ohio 2 weeks ago an hour after sunset while driving. I was too slow in pulling over and setting up my camera. Also, wouldn’t this have crashed somewhere where someone would have noticed?
Looks more like space junk coming home.
If that is in fact what it is I highly approve. At any rate it could be media satellites too.
I'd like to th I not thays true.
Even the cameraman thinks its just a plane. Too many people on here are drooling for UFOs and the shills know it so they post crap like this multiple times to divert attention from what matters. This is jet contrails lit up by early/late sunlight. https://youtu.be/FtAZNiCrUWA
It looks like a short contrail at sunset.
Very odd. Any ideas on what it really is? It looks absolutely huge. No news items on it?
https://twitter.com/donnawr8/status/1342900979671379968?s=21 Found it.
starting around :27 seconds, looks like something drops off. Then you see a 2nd-stage kick in, and a booster-engine (perhaps) falls to the right. The 'rocket' continues, and the falling booster starts "puffing out" the last of it's propellant?
And, the falling booster is what's seen in the other video over WVa?
why did I get downvoted for this?
Very cool. I don't live anywhere near launch sites and haven't watched this before. Thank-you.
Rocket skipping off the firmament.
that's a United Launch Alliance Delta 4 Heavy rocket launched from Vandenburg AFB, earlier this year...
https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/16/ula-delivers-delta-4-heavy-rocket-to-california-launch-base/
That video is ? a rocket launch.
This looks like a possible intercept by anti-missile missile. Never seen one like this, though. Literally looked like a nuclear detonation in the upper atmosphere.
And how is that spotlight just hovering there? It’s like God is holding a flaslight or something.
That’s how rocket launches look in the upper atmosphere. The bright thing that falls away is the lower stage of a SpaceX rocket doing the boost back burn so that it will land itself back at the pad or on a drone ship.
If you want to see more here is a compilation https://youtu.be/pqMVTDojZAM
Here are some of space X landing the first stage rockets https://youtu.be/_2W8q6_GW-c
Well, that's not a news item, but thanks.
da fook
Saying it’s space boosters. Some folks saying it’s for SpaceX