(sick of seeing these pedophilia references used as names in here, third I have noticed since last night)
Genuinely interested to know Why you believe that is acceptable here? Or anywhere for that matter! You obviously understand that is like our top priority, our #1 fight.
I have yet to see anyone making the US Corporation argument ever provide actual evidence, rather than assertions, to support it.
Every single section of the 1871 Act, when reading it, is in reference not to the entire USA but to the District of Columbia, and specifically states it is limited to "all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. Many cities are set up as municipal corporations. That was not unusual.
As Troglodyte said, ending the US Constitution and Republic and creating an (alleged) new form of government is not so simple as passing an Act.
For some reason I do not know, many are very determined to push this theory, even though they never actually back it up.
I was actually thrown off a Patriot (?) board for consistently asking for evidence on this and pointing out none was ever being given.
Until someone can back it up that it extends to anything beyond what it says, namely the District of Columbia itself, to me it's a disinfo campaign that has gotten many way off track.
Also as pointed out, Q has never advanced this at all, whatsoever.
What this idea does is, it pretty much will discredit any Patriot to his neighbor or friends when he goes on about it. Maybe they were listening up to then, but any number will decide someone is a nut when they argue this theory they have no substantiation for, only some weblinks that themselves provide no evidence, and anyone can read the Act for themselves and see it does not say this at all.
Everyone here is exploring possibilities, uncovering clues, etc. Some of you guys keep shutting down discussion.
Some research will provide the truth of this matter, and it has much to do with the situation as it stands right this minute.
We would be wise to allow discussion of whatever ideas are here, within reason, and this idea is within reason. Trolls/shills/etc are the exception. The Q idea is an open door to things we have never been taught.
Declaration of Independence, which was passed by the Continental Congress in 1776 which affirms “That whenever any Form (sic) of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…” This proves that the United States was founded on the idea that the people have a right to declare independence and to rule themselves through a government by the people if the government does become authoritarian or undemocratic in nature.
Don't conflate the US corporation formed by the 1871 Act with sovereign citizen bullshit, you fucking moron. They are two different topics entirely.
Thank you. Someone had to tell him.
Seriously though mad guy, who fucking cares? You can argue all day long whether the US is a corporation or not. It doesn't fucking matter one bit.
If this is a different topic than sovereign citizens, then you've fooled me because you all sound exactly the same with your legal gobbledygook.
But please, if I don't get it because I'm a "fucking moron", please enlighten me on how this matters.
Yeah, I don't necessarily (but I'm open-minded to it) buy the US Corp. stuff, but how TF do you get "sovereign cirizen" out of this??
Cheese & crackers...... rolleyes.png
If you 'google' search it, it is litterally true that it is a corporation
Discussion is hardly "gospel"
Agree. I've literally ONLY seen shitty memes, rumors & discussion about this.
Not one single law / bill passed & signed by Trump; not one EO; NOTHING.
Just speculation & rumor.
Anons like to interpret things and sometimes they're spot on, and sometimes they're completely wrong.
It's something to investigate further, even if it's totally off at further inspection.
Find out for yourself through research, and if you find out there's holes in the conjecture, do us a favor and share your findings.
People are jumping on anything new. At this point, it is nothing but hopium. The only way this is proved is if it actually happens in the real world.
Maybe you should educate yourself before you say stupid things and look like a troll.
If it hurts to read stuff like that, why don’t you maybe fuck off for a bit?
I totally agree. I never bought into any of that 'owned by Britain.' Almost sounds like Leftist disinfo to me.
Here is a very good breakdown of how the USA is indeed a corporation: http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
Exactly!
Q never said anything about nesara or USA corp
Pizzatonight? On a Q board? Bad taste you fucking Pedo.
i actually didnt know about pizzagate when the account was made, pretty new to all this stuff.
i really was having a normal pizza when account was created.
anyway judge me by my posts not by my account name
Because that would have given too much info to the enemy. They didn’t want us to figure that part out.
pizzatonight? REALLY?
Why?
(sick of seeing these pedophilia references used as names in here, third I have noticed since last night)
Genuinely interested to know Why you believe that is acceptable here? Or anywhere for that matter! You obviously understand that is like our top priority, our #1 fight.
i actually didnt know about pizzagate when the account was made, pretty new to all this stuff.
i really was having a normal pizza when account was created.
anyway judge me by my posts not by my account name
The copy and paste seems like someone lazy who gets paid to shill would do.....
I have yet to see anyone making the US Corporation argument ever provide actual evidence, rather than assertions, to support it.
Every single section of the 1871 Act, when reading it, is in reference not to the entire USA but to the District of Columbia, and specifically states it is limited to "all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. Many cities are set up as municipal corporations. That was not unusual.
As Troglodyte said, ending the US Constitution and Republic and creating an (alleged) new form of government is not so simple as passing an Act.
For some reason I do not know, many are very determined to push this theory, even though they never actually back it up.
I was actually thrown off a Patriot (?) board for consistently asking for evidence on this and pointing out none was ever being given.
Until someone can back it up that it extends to anything beyond what it says, namely the District of Columbia itself, to me it's a disinfo campaign that has gotten many way off track.
Also as pointed out, Q has never advanced this at all, whatsoever.
What this idea does is, it pretty much will discredit any Patriot to his neighbor or friends when he goes on about it. Maybe they were listening up to then, but any number will decide someone is a nut when they argue this theory they have no substantiation for, only some weblinks that themselves provide no evidence, and anyone can read the Act for themselves and see it does not say this at all.
Sorry, but it has Everything to do with what is going and going Down....
Team Law explains it very clearly:
https://teamlaw.net/HistoryOutline.htm https://teamlaw.net/history.htm https://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm
I keep hearing about the Act of 1871, but I'd like to actually read the Act itself.
Does anyone have the text of the 'Act of 1871'?
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
There is no smoking gun in the text. If there is, then it is accessible and should be provided.
Would you please get a grip?
Everyone here is exploring possibilities, uncovering clues, etc. Some of you guys keep shutting down discussion.
Some research will provide the truth of this matter, and it has much to do with the situation as it stands right this minute.
We would be wise to allow discussion of whatever ideas are here, within reason, and this idea is within reason. Trolls/shills/etc are the exception. The Q idea is an open door to things we have never been taught.
Is this relevent?
Declaration of Independence, which was passed by the Continental Congress in 1776 which affirms “That whenever any Form (sic) of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…” This proves that the United States was founded on the idea that the people have a right to declare independence and to rule themselves through a government by the people if the government does become authoritarian or undemocratic in nature.
The Declaration of Independence is not the Constitution.
Understood. Your point?
My biggest issue with the corporation angle is that it implies a certain respect for written contracts and legal procedure that I have not seen.
Even if it is true, it changes nothing.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002
(15)“United States” means— (A)a Federal corporation;
This is real the US was a corporation until Jan 21 at 11.59 pm
Fuck off, Chink.