Dan Scavino posted this on his story 25 min ago, what’s everyone’s take?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (206)
sorted by:
Definite emphasis on the gold fringing imo.
Is there a meaning to that? Is with or without the fringe representative of the USA Corp vs the United States of America?
The gold fringe represents Admiralty law - law of the sea - law of international commerce - inferior to the law of the land. Nonetheless, masquerading as "superior law" since 1933/1938, at which time, all common law courts were usurped and only Admiralty/Maritime law (Crown Temple "legal society" rules and procedures) was taught to law students going forward to this day. Basically, virtually every attorney alive today (unless he/she were 100 years old) hasn't a clue about this.
What's the difference?
If every single attorney alive today, including every jurist, judge, prosecutor, etc. is unaware of this system of law, it seems like a fairly safe bet that this system of law is not in effect.
Particularly since whenever this comes up, the courts dismiss it as nonsense.
Not the same argument. The courts dismiss the argument that people make stating the presence of the gold fringed flag means the constitution is suspended. They make this argument as if this will negate all of the courts positions. All Cognac is brandy but not all brandy is cognac. All military courts under martial law fly the gold fringed flag but not all courts with the gold fringed flag are under martial law.
Yes, because of course if we are saying the courts are running under admiralty law, to justify their overreach and confiscation of our $$$ via statutes, ordinances, and sanctions, they are going to say "you got it, you solved the riddle! Here's all your parking ticket and speeding fines back. Heres your permit fees to put a toilet in your basement back. Sorry, no hard feelings, huh?"
Since that has not happened, then this is all just made up nonsense.
do you have any source to back that up?
I looked it up in a book called History of United States Flag 1880 and it didn't say shit about gold fringe and Admiralty law.
it said that the Calvary Standard was the US flag with gold trim. They carried it into battle.
Admiralty/Marttime law shit is just fanfiction if it cannot be traced to a law book or maritime manual. Same thing with the DC corporation shit of 1871. I read the original Act. It's a nothing burger.
The very first time I heard about the gold fringe/admiralty law stuff was on all the video clips of the 'sovereign citizen' types, who represented themselves pro se and argue their case in court that they dont have to have drivers licenses, pay fines for road use to police etc.
Also citing how they have no obligation to represent any 'united states corporation' interests, that was always part of the depositions and cases made.
Are we really seeing indicators that all the legal premise behind this stuff was valid and correct all along? That the hysteria shrieked about the sovereign citizens in the fake-news media, how they are a horrifying terrorist threat etc was all the same sort of panic and hysteria they applied to POTUS and for the same reason.. that the money-lenders are getting cast out of the temple?
This timeline..
Lin wood posted a telegram a day or ttwo ago about the significance of the gold fringe and why it’s in court rooms.
https://www.change.org/p/we-the-people-endorsement-of-martial-law-flag-1-year-imprisonment-for-all-judges-that-fly-a-gold-fringe-flag
Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.The Law of the Flag regulates the laws under which contracts entered into will be governed. (See Ruhstrat v. People.) Any courtroom that displays such a flag behind the Judge is a military courtroom which Is operating under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or statute law, Restrictions. (Note added: This court is thereby receiving public funds under false and fraudulent pretense and is committing Treason against the Constitution under the 16th American Jurist Prudence Section 177). Whereas : 1,2 American Flag such as a gold fringe MUTILATES the flag and carries a one year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of Title 36, Section § 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and, purportedly, represents “color of military law” jurisdiction and when placed on the Title 4 U.S.C. Section §§ 1,2 Flag, mutilates the flag and suspends the Constitution. Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242, see BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.
This is the actual link to Executive Order 10834 and it doesn't say fuckall about gold fringe or military flags.
Flag orders had to be updated when a new star was added because a new state was admitted into the Union. In this case, Hawaii.
The petition references that order to establish the clearly defined specifications of the flag, it's not quoting it. The petition continues from the EO to establish that yellow ISN'T in the EO, is a color.
The next reference is 34 ops atty gen 83, and then Ruhstrat vs People, then Title 4 USC sec 1,2 and Title 18 USC sec 242. Not a lawfag, would have to go check these out.
Yes, fingers represents maritime admiralty law (the corporation)
I think they are giving the corporation a helicopter ride. Bye bye....