If Q and the military are going to do something, they'd better do it before pedo Biden tries to force vaccinations. People will get out the guns to stop the criminal shit and some states will fight back against it.
It's not a vaccine. Vaccines provide immunity, which this does not. This is gene therapy being called a vaccine, probably for liability reasons. But I am no doctor, so that's just my view.
A gene therapy is defined as a therapy that alters a cells genome. The Pfizer/Moderna vaccines do not do that. It would be appropriate to call it bio-nanotechnology, or maybe an mRNA therapy. However, it would be, by definition anyways, inappropriate or at least inaccurate (in scope) to call it a vaccine.
A vaccine is an injection of part of a virus to induce an immune response. This injects an mRNA made without any assistance from the virus itself, which highjacks the cell to express a protein on its surface that is the same as a protein that sars-cov-2 expresses on its surface. So it does not use any part of the actual virus (the definition of a vaccine) but makes your body create a (perfectly reasonable and exact) facsimile of a small part of it.
By itself I have no problem with the ideas of the technology. On the contrary, I design related tech. The problem I have with the technology is that it is designed to induce an autoimmune response in an unspecified location of the body (its supposed to be in the muscle, but once they get into the bloodstream they can go anywhere).
Bigger than the tech problem is that it is an insufficiently tested experimental technology being forced (currently through social pressure, eventually through law) upon the whole world.
Even bigger than that problem is that all the real data is being lied about so that people can't make informed decisions. This is in direct violation of the Nuremberg code, which makes this a crime against humanity.
One of my childhood friends is a woke warrior, virtue signalling about being "pro-vaccine" and the such. The implications being if you don't want this "vaccine" you are an "evil anti-vaxxer", regardless of your opinions on (real) vaccines.
By your words, he's "pro-gene therapy", which can be turned back on the Nuremberg Code and the ties to that.
Articulating this here because someone else may also find this a useful way to turn the tables if someone asks if you're "pro-vaccine".
Since it is an mRNA jab, what is not known are the long term consequences. Meaning, you need to make sure the person you are making love to, also has not been jabbed with this vaccine, because it may infect you via saliva and other bodily fluids. WE don't know yet.
It seems it does influence fertility, so if you have plans for starting a family, that may be an important issue.
Next point of order is: how infectious is the jab? Can it jump from person to person airborne? Or via aerosols?
Does it recombine with other future jabs technology?
What is protective against it?
How about the food chain? What does your diet look like? Pepsi and Coca Cola a lot? Mc hamburgers? prepped food? Take out?
How can you neutralize it once it enters your body.
I am not trying to be alarming here, but these issues have not yet been addressed. And I suspect the mRNA IS the virus.
It is my understanding that
emergency use authorization requires voluntary participation. It cannot be
mandatory without full authorization and approval of the regulatory agencies.
Showing up and presenting your arm is considered voluntary.
If you want to stop The New World Order Agenda, you must help expose the “root” and model community where Joe BIden personally endorsed a Billion Dollar Referendum for Community Healthy, Community Education and Community Policing - Racine, Wisconsin.
The Truth has been shared since The Beginning. Racine is the model for Agenda 21 and 2030 where they passed “the most over-arching COVID order or ordinance in the nation” (Judge Fredrickson).
Expose The Root. Reveal the Agenda. Deny The Mark of the Beast.
Covid-19, meaning the pathologies bundled together, meaning the dis-ease signs a patient may show, can be classified as the sickness covid-19, but, since these are already known clinical pathologies garbled up and put into one container, it may also be something else.
SARSCOV-2 and it's alleged and reported variations, that is what you want to focus on. That is the name of the "virus".
And IF they have an isolated example, the source becomes very important, since no medical science papers exist meeting the Koch postulates on isolation and causality.
See also NCBI: Ab Osterhaus SARS meeting Koch Postulates.
there's a good debate between Robert Kennedy and Allen Dershowitz about vaccines and covid and not sure at what point in video, but they both acknowledge that this case isn't on point given emergency use of this "vaccine" and other things.
Yeah my old friend tried to say this means they goverbwmt can force us and they still can't. The most they did was fine that guy for not taking it. They can't mandate a vax and the second they do thats when we have a right to stand up to a tyrannical government. I also called my old friend a sheep.
So, the supreme court decision in the post is still the law. But, so far, I don’t believe any states have mandated the CV “vaccine”.
However, states do permit certain types of exemptions from the mandatory requirement and each state determines what it will allow.
Generally speaking, an exemption must fall into one of three categories: medical, religious and personal.
All 50 states and the District of Columbia allow medical exemptions. Every state except three -- California, Mississippi, and West Virginia -- allows religious exemptions. And 17 states allow parents to obtain an exemption for their children for personal reasons.
But, it is very important to bear in mind that personal exemptions for children are harder to get in some states than in others. And regardless of your objection, you will first need to find out what your state will allow.
If Q and the military are going to do something, they'd better do it before pedo Biden tries to force vaccinations. People will get out the guns to stop the criminal shit and some states will fight back against it.
It's not a vaccine. Vaccines provide immunity, which this does not. This is gene therapy being called a vaccine, probably for liability reasons. But I am no doctor, so that's just my view.
A gene therapy is defined as a therapy that alters a cells genome. The Pfizer/Moderna vaccines do not do that. It would be appropriate to call it bio-nanotechnology, or maybe an mRNA therapy. However, it would be, by definition anyways, inappropriate or at least inaccurate (in scope) to call it a vaccine.
A vaccine is an injection of part of a virus to induce an immune response. This injects an mRNA made without any assistance from the virus itself, which highjacks the cell to express a protein on its surface that is the same as a protein that sars-cov-2 expresses on its surface. So it does not use any part of the actual virus (the definition of a vaccine) but makes your body create a (perfectly reasonable and exact) facsimile of a small part of it.
By itself I have no problem with the ideas of the technology. On the contrary, I design related tech. The problem I have with the technology is that it is designed to induce an autoimmune response in an unspecified location of the body (its supposed to be in the muscle, but once they get into the bloodstream they can go anywhere).
Bigger than the tech problem is that it is an insufficiently tested experimental technology being forced (currently through social pressure, eventually through law) upon the whole world.
Even bigger than that problem is that all the real data is being lied about so that people can't make informed decisions. This is in direct violation of the Nuremberg code, which makes this a crime against humanity.
Thank you, hard to to find info from a reliable source.
One of my childhood friends is a woke warrior, virtue signalling about being "pro-vaccine" and the such. The implications being if you don't want this "vaccine" you are an "evil anti-vaxxer", regardless of your opinions on (real) vaccines.
By your words, he's "pro-gene therapy", which can be turned back on the Nuremberg Code and the ties to that.
Articulating this here because someone else may also find this a useful way to turn the tables if someone asks if you're "pro-vaccine".
In this case, vaccine is just a marketing name, like BLM.
Im with you. My door will be the last door they ever knock on.
That is one part of this issue.
Since it is an mRNA jab, what is not known are the long term consequences. Meaning, you need to make sure the person you are making love to, also has not been jabbed with this vaccine, because it may infect you via saliva and other bodily fluids. WE don't know yet.
It seems it does influence fertility, so if you have plans for starting a family, that may be an important issue.
Next point of order is: how infectious is the jab? Can it jump from person to person airborne? Or via aerosols?
Does it recombine with other future jabs technology?
What is protective against it?
How about the food chain? What does your diet look like? Pepsi and Coca Cola a lot? Mc hamburgers? prepped food? Take out?
How can you neutralize it once it enters your body.
I am not trying to be alarming here, but these issues have not yet been addressed. And I suspect the mRNA IS the virus.
Jacobins mabey
It is my understanding that emergency use authorization requires voluntary participation. It cannot be mandatory without full authorization and approval of the regulatory agencies. Showing up and presenting your arm is considered voluntary.
That ruling itself is unconstitutional. The State didn't give me my freedom. God did.
They can go fuck them selves. They could even handle a blatantly obvious election fraud, they have no place attempting to impose rules on thr people.
Even without this, cucked SCROTUS would probably let them try to force us and say that any challenges "don't have standing"
If you want to stop The New World Order Agenda, you must help expose the “root” and model community where Joe BIden personally endorsed a Billion Dollar Referendum for Community Healthy, Community Education and Community Policing - Racine, Wisconsin.
The Truth has been shared since The Beginning. Racine is the model for Agenda 21 and 2030 where they passed “the most over-arching COVID order or ordinance in the nation” (Judge Fredrickson).
Expose The Root. Reveal the Agenda. Deny The Mark of the Beast.
Covid-19, meaning the pathologies bundled together, meaning the dis-ease signs a patient may show, can be classified as the sickness covid-19, but, since these are already known clinical pathologies garbled up and put into one container, it may also be something else.
SARSCOV-2 and it's alleged and reported variations, that is what you want to focus on. That is the name of the "virus".
And IF they have an isolated example, the source becomes very important, since no medical science papers exist meeting the Koch postulates on isolation and causality.
See also NCBI: Ab Osterhaus SARS meeting Koch Postulates.
Government only has the power we give it. All else is force, and that can go both ways.
If anyone starts a sentence with “the Supreme Court said”, please kindly blow their fucking head off.
Supreme Court is worthless and nothing they say has any meaning anymore.
From a court that was and still controlled by the Swamp/[DS]
NEVER WILL TAKE ANY VACCINE.
ANYONE WHO TRIES WILL BE THEIR LAST ACT ON THIS EARTH!!!
SO HELP ME GOD!!!!
Year...1905...Nuremberg...40 years later...
there's a good debate between Robert Kennedy and Allen Dershowitz about vaccines and covid and not sure at what point in video, but they both acknowledge that this case isn't on point given emergency use of this "vaccine" and other things.
think this is video link
https://youtu.be/qRA3oTcCoQA
i also posted ideas for those that might feel forced to take the jab:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRjA2lYG/how-to-avoid-covid-jab-if-being-/
Yup....tooth and nail scenario
Yeah my old friend tried to say this means they goverbwmt can force us and they still can't. The most they did was fine that guy for not taking it. They can't mandate a vax and the second they do thats when we have a right to stand up to a tyrannical government. I also called my old friend a sheep.
If they Jab me, I will be charged! Jus sayin
The implication is: Stick your arm out, we're jabbing you now!!
How would it be defined under a (covid 19) Trumps state of emergency, in march 2020? They cannot force a vaccine under these circumstances, right?
So, the supreme court decision in the post is still the law. But, so far, I don’t believe any states have mandated the CV “vaccine”.
However, states do permit certain types of exemptions from the mandatory requirement and each state determines what it will allow.
Generally speaking, an exemption must fall into one of three categories: medical, religious and personal.
All 50 states and the District of Columbia allow medical exemptions. Every state except three -- California, Mississippi, and West Virginia -- allows religious exemptions. And 17 states allow parents to obtain an exemption for their children for personal reasons.
But, it is very important to bear in mind that personal exemptions for children are harder to get in some states than in others. And regardless of your objection, you will first need to find out what your state will allow.