So they are going to get legal advice about turning over passwords. Unless they planned on disclosing the passwords during the session, I cannot see why they would need a closed door session for this.
I would guess that Attorney-client privilege requires it. Is there a lawyer who can chime in on this practice and what it means if someone is guilty or innocent of actions?
Yea. That is a good point. They're not suppose to. But let's assume the following scenarios:
They know they are about to be sued for something and need the advice of a lawyer about what they should and shouldn't disclose. If they should be doing any additional record keeping, etc.. Disclosing privileged information means the meeting needs to be held away from public view.
They know they did something illegal and need the advice of a lawyer on how or what they should do to make things less worse. Even worse, they seek lawyer advice on how to destroy evidence legally.
I'm going to assume point #2 is what they are doing because of the extraordinary amount of effort they put into avoiding the audit.
But there is no such thing as privileged information when acting on the publics behalf. The People have a right to know EVERYTHING. Complete and total transparency. Anything less and their actions are nefarious by definition, making it urgent that the People know everything.
This is a Constitutional Republic. A government of the People, by the People and for the People. The only hidden information that can be condoned is when divulging such would put the very nation at risk and even in that the People have oversight through their elected representatives. These fools put the Nation at risk with their subterfuge. The exact opposite. It is treason.
There is no privilege when trying to hide your criminal actions in public office from the People. Not as a group acting in their public capacity. As individuals they have due process and attorney client privilege. Thats not what they are doing here.
Ah. Thanks for the pointer. I looked it up and you might be right on this that the attorney client privilege does not apply when associated with official government functions (which is this case). It only applies for personal matters outside the government body and the fact that they are seeking legal advice as part of a government function means they waive their rights. That means if subpoenad or requested in court, they might be required to disclose what they talked about
Note: not a lawyer, but did a bunch of reading and tried my best to interpret.
They know we are talking about how they don’t have the password so now they will probably say they do in a way that won’t incriminate them as much in court. They probably realize not having the password is worse than not giving it.
Not having the admin password would mean you can’t administer these devices most likely and mean someone else is in charge
How to NOT drop the Soap in Prison???
Non-extradition Nations??
Which Language Learning Programs are best??
Do Coyotes also sneak people INTO Mexico??
How to FAKE being a Foreigner??
.
All possible things they might have "Discussed"".......
Yeah, I noticed that as well. Doubt is natural when we've spent so much time on the side being kicked to the curb. He just needs reassurance, none of his doubts are really serious. Besides, he's right, the military is the only way, but it's better to go into action with right on your side. We'll just keep an eye on new posts.
Yes you are. Those pictures of the data files were from before the election. They were taken home by our enemies. You saying they are from the audit is misinformation if not an outright lie.
Quit spreading this crap. Those data files were left unsecured BEFORE the election. This is a chain of custody problem for the tyrants not the Patriots.
I wonder how long we'll be in prison. How bad is the food? Boy I'm Glad Sheriff Joe isn't around anymore
And no records kept.
Have your antifa fagits dress up in trump hats and storm the building, duh.
Wizard, beat me too it!
How fucked they are
So they are going to get legal advice about turning over passwords. Unless they planned on disclosing the passwords during the session, I cannot see why they would need a closed door session for this.
I would guess that Attorney-client privilege requires it. Is there a lawyer who can chime in on this practice and what it means if someone is guilty or innocent of actions?
They are public servants. Public servants should never, NEVER, discuss the Peoples business behind closed doors.
Yea. That is a good point. They're not suppose to. But let's assume the following scenarios:
They know they are about to be sued for something and need the advice of a lawyer about what they should and shouldn't disclose. If they should be doing any additional record keeping, etc.. Disclosing privileged information means the meeting needs to be held away from public view.
They know they did something illegal and need the advice of a lawyer on how or what they should do to make things less worse. Even worse, they seek lawyer advice on how to destroy evidence legally.
I'm going to assume point #2 is what they are doing because of the extraordinary amount of effort they put into avoiding the audit.
But there is no such thing as privileged information when acting on the publics behalf. The People have a right to know EVERYTHING. Complete and total transparency. Anything less and their actions are nefarious by definition, making it urgent that the People know everything.
This is a Constitutional Republic. A government of the People, by the People and for the People. The only hidden information that can be condoned is when divulging such would put the very nation at risk and even in that the People have oversight through their elected representatives. These fools put the Nation at risk with their subterfuge. The exact opposite. It is treason.
There is no privilege when trying to hide your criminal actions in public office from the People. Not as a group acting in their public capacity. As individuals they have due process and attorney client privilege. Thats not what they are doing here.
Ah. Thanks for the pointer. I looked it up and you might be right on this that the attorney client privilege does not apply when associated with official government functions (which is this case). It only applies for personal matters outside the government body and the fact that they are seeking legal advice as part of a government function means they waive their rights. That means if subpoenad or requested in court, they might be required to disclose what they talked about
Note: not a lawyer, but did a bunch of reading and tried my best to interpret.
There ya go with all that transparency and stuff
Their panic is palatable
Palatable Panic would be a cool username
Best bail bondsman?
how they didn't have any admin passwords or power over any of it? lol
They know we are talking about how they don’t have the password so now they will probably say they do in a way that won’t incriminate them as much in court. They probably realize not having the password is worse than not giving it.
Not having the admin password would mean you can’t administer these devices most likely and mean someone else is in charge
busted!
What flights were available to South America that evening.
As if the white hats don't have mic/video in that room... kek.
Several uneducated guesses:
"I've brought you all here today to discuss who the murderer is...."
"...open the next secret envelope, see what we're supposed to tell them now."
"Did I leave the iron on this morning...?"
"I don't know who he thinks he's fooling, that Jenner guy is an ugly drag queen."
"Hey, we should talk about when we're gonna send in the clowns."
How to NOT drop the Soap in Prison??? Non-extradition Nations?? Which Language Learning Programs are best?? Do Coyotes also sneak people INTO Mexico?? How to FAKE being a Foreigner?? . All possible things they might have "Discussed"".......
Invest in Soap-on-a-Rope... stock up now and avoid the rush...
Lol I came here to write, "To come to a consensus as to the best prison jump suit color," but I like yours better ?
I've got the Dominion password, it's 'Cheat'
This makes me happy ?
Maybe the tweet by that arizona official who said the auditors already had the passwords?
To be honest, this audit is already compromised no matter what they find.
Someone put a pic up, whether true or not, of the data files being left unsecured location with no guards.
One of the people involved is the AZ Republican who wouldve been the EC Rep had he won - immediately conflict of interest.
So we're now in a situation whereby no matter how much evidence is found, the left will have an excuse to dismiss and bury it.
Hence, as I keep saying over and over and over again. MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY.
(They are also not signature matching for some bizarre reason.)
Don't know about this. Jovan says that there are dozens of security cameras in addition to the nine that we see on-line.
Yeah, I noticed that as well. Doubt is natural when we've spent so much time on the side being kicked to the curb. He just needs reassurance, none of his doubts are really serious. Besides, he's right, the military is the only way, but it's better to go into action with right on your side. We'll just keep an eye on new posts.
Stay strong and alert Patriot.
Yea Im beginning to think hes a deep plant mole for the bad guys. His info is a lie.
I only listen to Q. MIL only way.
All of this is theatre and distraction.
Audit is already compromised in terms of waking anyone up on the left is what I am getting at.
Thats fine but your still spreading disinformation.
Not really.
Yes you are. Those pictures of the data files were from before the election. They were taken home by our enemies. You saying they are from the audit is misinformation if not an outright lie.
Quit spreading this crap. Those data files were left unsecured BEFORE the election. This is a chain of custody problem for the tyrants not the Patriots.
Discussing the most efficacious brand of adult diapers.
NCSWIC