Absolutely. Come on people, the ball even spins in the direction he was pulling. Clearly him pulling eventually overcame the static friction of the ball, causing it to spin away.
Watched carefully. He was holding it, but didn't squeeze it, just let it go. The ball was not that taut to get squeezed accidentally. With a softer ball like that, if you do squeeze, it would absorb the squeeze a bit more before bouncing off harder.
No gravity means the object isnt pulled toward de center of a certain mass. Now there is always gravity, just very weak. That said the small push down he gives the ball will inevitably push it down.
Weak gravity will not be enough to make the ball "fall" the way it did. At the most it would have slowly drifted over many minutes or hours. So lets take that out of this discussion.
As for the push - yes you can believe he happened to push it down, it is a subjective thing just by looking at the video, and I respect your perspective that it looked like a push. For reasons I outlined before, my perspective is different, and you haven't provided any new information to sway this view.
Not saying the weak gravity pulled the ball, was just pointing out we are always subjected to a gravity however small it may be. In there the strongest gravity pull could be upward for all we know, but it would still be too weak to counter a small push. I am saying its basically close to 0 gravity in there. A small push will send the ball in a direction and nothing will be there to slow it down. i am gonna check the video again later and try to see other moving things like hair and such.
check out the hair of the woman, the way they move and also the left person, using his core to bend (they are probably strapped/anchors by their foot to stay still). only other things really moving in that video and the small pad just laying against the legs of one of the person.
Water cannot fly. Meanwhile, 747s take off from airports all the time. Plenty of air routes go over arctic areas (been there, done that). Going directly over the north pole leads to Russia, which has very picky restrictions about air travel. It also is not good for the magnetic compass and the gyrocompass to go over a magnetic and rotational pole. Same thing for the south pole, with the added problem of being very far from an alternative landing point. I have never heard that "no one" has flown over either pole. No particular point in doing so. (More impressive for submarines to surface at the north pole.) Many air routes deviate from Great Circles owing to avoidance of political regions. And there are few air routes where there is little market. Not a lot of people have a need to travel directly from Botswana to Paraguay. As for the Mars Rover, ask NASA. They do everything they can to convince the world they are still a class act.
And which day would that be? The day you come up with pictures over the edge of the Earth? You are an embarrassment to civilization. Close to 500 years of science, and for you it is pearls before swine.
No, you nitwit. Science is an activity like swimming or yoga. People engage in it. Governments lock down the world. Get your pointer fixed. By the way, science enables you to post your ignorant opinions for worldwide view. Now, go off and get photographic proof of the edge of the world. Then maybe we can take you seriously (if you even accept that photography is not some kind of hoax).
I do apologize. I drop in late at night when I am tired, and thought I was responding to 420-Trump-2020. So I might also have misread your tone and meaning.
But the science that allows us to create technology is the science that is vetted by reality, so it is worth respect. Political science, not so much.
I am not by any means a skeptic about the physics of the Earth. I have spent 40 years working in the realms of orbital mechanics and intercontinental trajectories. The ancient Greeks knew the Earth was spherical and came very close to a correct estimation of its diameter. You might profit by their example.
You are hilarious. I can't count the number of times I come up against a know-nothing brainiac who contends impossibilities, and when it comes time to defend his point of view, he resorts to INSULTS. Insults. The trademark of children.
No deception pal. Ever been anywhere? Like the middle of the Pacific Ocean, east central Africa, over Greenland on the great circle from Seattle to Paris? Ever spent 40 years in the industry that specializes in sending up satellites and astronauts? No...none of this stuff. All you have are cartoons about a flat Earth, a misunderstanding about atmospheric optics, and absolutely no photographic evidence of the Edge of the World. Why, it should be possible for you to go to the top of the Empire State Building and take a telescopic photograph of the pyramids of Egypt. Or, what the heck. Make it easy. Just take a picture of the Eiffel Tower!
But no...just insults. I really shouldn't waste this much time on you, but you exasperate me. All the benefits of thousands of years of civilization, and you don't even know what Eratosthenes knew. You are a crying shame.
Nothing but religious indoctrination from your low iq mouth. You want 2 bitcoins? All you need is 1 scientific proof of the globe. Your lies and stories don't count. Interested, ask for details
Nothing but nothing from your ignorance. You want a proof? Check out Eratosthenes' calculation of the radius of the Earth, 200 BC. Prove him wrong.
Other than that, orbiting satellites would seem to demonstrate conclusive proof (so long as you don't admit the geographic exploration of the Earth, possible only on a spherical surface). You have absolutely nothing for your case and you have no evidence of the Edge of the World. Put up or shut up.
At least in this discussion I am advancing established evidence and facts. All you have is disdain. You have nothing.
I think the ISS is real. I think they make fake videos for convenience or something. Too expensive to really keep people up there maybe...
You can find video tours of the ISS where they take you through every room and angle of the place with people floating around in the background at any weird angle.
That said, these videos they put out now literally have people hanging on wires.. They're visible at times. Objects pass through their bodies or just plain blink out of existence. There's videos where they supposedly have a delay due to the distance, but someone on earth makes a joke and the astronaut busts out laughing instantly...
These videos are definitely screwy, but there are others that look pretty accurate. Higher budget? Maybe, but the ISS tour videos you can find on YouTube look pretty real to me.
Compelling pictures? You try to track an object moving at the equivalent of Mach 25 and take a picture of it. And through atmospheric murk, to boot. The orbit is known. It should be available in any amateur astronomy magazine. Viewing is probably best near sunrise or dusk, when the sky background is black but there is sunlight to illuminate the station. Midday is no good (sky is too bright). Night is no good (in Earth's shadow). You can probably see it with the naked eye, but shooting a photo on the fly is a lot harder.
Not only does his squeeze losing grip propel the ball, it is not accelerating like it would in surface gravity (where you assume it is filmed instead of in zero g orbit)
Sorry, but there are vids that do show space station fakery. This one makes you look foolish and only brings out the flat earth dimwits.
Gravity is not the only force in play. If the ball is statically charged, it will move in response to local electric potential. This is why charged balloons will stick to a wall.
Its almost embarrassing to see someone think the ISS isn't actually up there... or that the earth is flat... it is not. It is not ok to think that in this day and age. We need Sci-Man-Dan in on this thread here pretty soon.
He squeezes the globe between his arm and his thigh causing the inflatable globe to squirt out in a downward direction.
Absolutely. Come on people, the ball even spins in the direction he was pulling. Clearly him pulling eventually overcame the static friction of the ball, causing it to spin away.
Physics, not even once.
I dont understand why everyone loves this ghost of ezra guy.
What’s the proof that it’s really him? I’ve seen none.
I would love to know more about the "portal" and ezra/kappy please. We seem to be some of the few who take Ezra seriously
C'mon guys, no gravity doesnt mean it goes up :) He pushed the ball down by squeezing it.
Watched carefully. He was holding it, but didn't squeeze it, just let it go. The ball was not that taut to get squeezed accidentally. With a softer ball like that, if you do squeeze, it would absorb the squeeze a bit more before bouncing off harder.
No gravity means the object isnt pulled toward de center of a certain mass. Now there is always gravity, just very weak. That said the small push down he gives the ball will inevitably push it down.
You are mixing two things together.
The weak gravity, and the push.
Weak gravity will not be enough to make the ball "fall" the way it did. At the most it would have slowly drifted over many minutes or hours. So lets take that out of this discussion.
As for the push - yes you can believe he happened to push it down, it is a subjective thing just by looking at the video, and I respect your perspective that it looked like a push. For reasons I outlined before, my perspective is different, and you haven't provided any new information to sway this view.
Not saying the weak gravity pulled the ball, was just pointing out we are always subjected to a gravity however small it may be. In there the strongest gravity pull could be upward for all we know, but it would still be too weak to counter a small push. I am saying its basically close to 0 gravity in there. A small push will send the ball in a direction and nothing will be there to slow it down. i am gonna check the video again later and try to see other moving things like hair and such.
check out the hair of the woman, the way they move and also the left person, using his core to bend (they are probably strapped/anchors by their foot to stay still). only other things really moving in that video and the small pad just laying against the legs of one of the person.
Water cannot fly. Meanwhile, 747s take off from airports all the time. Plenty of air routes go over arctic areas (been there, done that). Going directly over the north pole leads to Russia, which has very picky restrictions about air travel. It also is not good for the magnetic compass and the gyrocompass to go over a magnetic and rotational pole. Same thing for the south pole, with the added problem of being very far from an alternative landing point. I have never heard that "no one" has flown over either pole. No particular point in doing so. (More impressive for submarines to surface at the north pole.) Many air routes deviate from Great Circles owing to avoidance of political regions. And there are few air routes where there is little market. Not a lot of people have a need to travel directly from Botswana to Paraguay. As for the Mars Rover, ask NASA. They do everything they can to convince the world they are still a class act.
i think it went toward the camera.
It didn't fall down "for no reason". He pushed it down. Gravity isn't the only force that makes things move.
They probably shit themselves because old mate fumbled the ball on camera, which is a distraction.
Been trying to tell you guys for years now that nasa is a fraud and the earth is flat. You'll get it one day
And which day would that be? The day you come up with pictures over the edge of the Earth? You are an embarrassment to civilization. Close to 500 years of science, and for you it is pearls before swine.
Science. You mean the same science that locked down the the world?
No, you nitwit. Science is an activity like swimming or yoga. People engage in it. Governments lock down the world. Get your pointer fixed. By the way, science enables you to post your ignorant opinions for worldwide view. Now, go off and get photographic proof of the edge of the world. Then maybe we can take you seriously (if you even accept that photography is not some kind of hoax).
Cool bro. I never said the earth was flat.
I do apologize. I drop in late at night when I am tired, and thought I was responding to 420-Trump-2020. So I might also have misread your tone and meaning.
But the science that allows us to create technology is the science that is vetted by reality, so it is worth respect. Political science, not so much.
Agree 100%
I appreciate your skepticism pede. You have to be open and honest to see the deception. Good luck on your journey
I am not by any means a skeptic about the physics of the Earth. I have spent 40 years working in the realms of orbital mechanics and intercontinental trajectories. The ancient Greeks knew the Earth was spherical and came very close to a correct estimation of its diameter. You might profit by their example.
Good brain washed nonsense. Enjoy your deception moron
You are hilarious. I can't count the number of times I come up against a know-nothing brainiac who contends impossibilities, and when it comes time to defend his point of view, he resorts to INSULTS. Insults. The trademark of children.
No deception pal. Ever been anywhere? Like the middle of the Pacific Ocean, east central Africa, over Greenland on the great circle from Seattle to Paris? Ever spent 40 years in the industry that specializes in sending up satellites and astronauts? No...none of this stuff. All you have are cartoons about a flat Earth, a misunderstanding about atmospheric optics, and absolutely no photographic evidence of the Edge of the World. Why, it should be possible for you to go to the top of the Empire State Building and take a telescopic photograph of the pyramids of Egypt. Or, what the heck. Make it easy. Just take a picture of the Eiffel Tower!
But no...just insults. I really shouldn't waste this much time on you, but you exasperate me. All the benefits of thousands of years of civilization, and you don't even know what Eratosthenes knew. You are a crying shame.
Nothing but religious indoctrination from your low iq mouth. You want 2 bitcoins? All you need is 1 scientific proof of the globe. Your lies and stories don't count. Interested, ask for details
Nothing but nothing from your ignorance. You want a proof? Check out Eratosthenes' calculation of the radius of the Earth, 200 BC. Prove him wrong.
Other than that, orbiting satellites would seem to demonstrate conclusive proof (so long as you don't admit the geographic exploration of the Earth, possible only on a spherical surface). You have absolutely nothing for your case and you have no evidence of the Edge of the World. Put up or shut up.
At least in this discussion I am advancing established evidence and facts. All you have is disdain. You have nothing.
Wow, what are the odds that the United States would be the center of the universe?
weak
I am open minded. But if there is no ISS, how can you make sure no one trains their telescopes towards it and find out?
That said, I dont seem to be able to find out that many compelling pictures. They all seem to say how hard it is to track it and take pictures of it.
I found this: http://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/International_Space_Station/Your_International_Space_Station_photos
Nothing there is compelling evidence that its a space station.
I think the ISS is real. I think they make fake videos for convenience or something. Too expensive to really keep people up there maybe...
You can find video tours of the ISS where they take you through every room and angle of the place with people floating around in the background at any weird angle.
That said, these videos they put out now literally have people hanging on wires.. They're visible at times. Objects pass through their bodies or just plain blink out of existence. There's videos where they supposedly have a delay due to the distance, but someone on earth makes a joke and the astronaut busts out laughing instantly...
These videos are definitely screwy, but there are others that look pretty accurate. Higher budget? Maybe, but the ISS tour videos you can find on YouTube look pretty real to me.
Compelling pictures? You try to track an object moving at the equivalent of Mach 25 and take a picture of it. And through atmospheric murk, to boot. The orbit is known. It should be available in any amateur astronomy magazine. Viewing is probably best near sunrise or dusk, when the sky background is black but there is sunlight to illuminate the station. Midday is no good (sky is too bright). Night is no good (in Earth's shadow). You can probably see it with the naked eye, but shooting a photo on the fly is a lot harder.
Not only does his squeeze losing grip propel the ball, it is not accelerating like it would in surface gravity (where you assume it is filmed instead of in zero g orbit)
Sorry, but there are vids that do show space station fakery. This one makes you look foolish and only brings out the flat earth dimwits.
Gravity is not the only force in play. If the ball is statically charged, it will move in response to local electric potential. This is why charged balloons will stick to a wall.
Look up other videos of that ball, it's an anti gravity ball... But there is videos of them dropping a screw too so idk
There was force imparted on that ball. This isnt proof of anything.
Wow what the heck?
Maybe they're NOT in a space station?????? Ya think???
Its almost embarrassing to see someone think the ISS isn't actually up there... or that the earth is flat... it is not. It is not ok to think that in this day and age. We need Sci-Man-Dan in on this thread here pretty soon.
This has always provided me with firm doses of cognitive dissonance.
So are you trying to say the US is on the North Pole?
This....their reactions were awkward