It's not even just the remedy that's the issue, it's the loopholes that persist in what constitutes fraud and who arbitrates that. Laws are only as good as those willing to enforce them and look at the military. They're a fucking mess.
We are certainly in unusual times so I expect things to proceed in an unusual way. The next year is sure to be chaotic both politically and economically. A bad combination!
Whilst that may be true in theory or morality, how can you conflate civil law to constitutional law?
As much as I'd love for that to be the case, the reason why you can't equate theft of property to election fraud is because of the bindings of the laws and actions to which both cases belong.
The process of reconciliation in a civil theft case is the return of the property OR alternatively (and most likely) insurance compensation for the loss of property. Why? Because that's the nuance that was decided upon as part of the process, part of the law.
Constitutional law isn't exactly the same. You have more variables. You have different confines of those laws, different reconciliation of the "crime".
Then you have a situation where the military could (but probably won't) get involved and their laws and standards of proof.
You have so many other things to consider in contemplation of Constitutional law.
Not that law means a whole lot to those in power, it seems. You have that to consider too. Constitutional law is only as strong as those willing to enforce it and I don't know about you, but the military isn't very "strong" on anything. Ultimately they're the ones who would have to enforce it.
Not saying that it wouldn't happen, but you wanted people to reconcile and thus, reconcile I shall.
Biden wasn't elected constitutionally. Jan 6th confirmation was void and illegitimate. He isnt the president. Therefore he is a hostile insurgent. He will be removed and a new emergency election run by temporary MIL control for continuity of gov.
California is a fucked up exception. In California, if you're caught stealing something under $950, you get a slap on the wrist. If you get caught stealing someone's home by occupying it for more than 30 days, and partially paying rent, you're legally entitled to stay.
?. I don’t see how anyone would see it any other way?
Gosh the Constitution doesn't outline any remedy for fraud so like we actually can't do anything hahahehe?
? whelp, I guess our hands are tied....fishing trip, anyone?
I’ll bring my guns.
? indeed.
It's not even just the remedy that's the issue, it's the loopholes that persist in what constitutes fraud and who arbitrates that. Laws are only as good as those willing to enforce them and look at the military. They're a fucking mess.
I agree.
How this plays out is the great mystery though.
Nothing else makes any sense on that ..
Excellent analogy!
We are certainly in unusual times so I expect things to proceed in an unusual way. The next year is sure to be chaotic both politically and economically. A bad combination!
Whilst that may be true in theory or morality, how can you conflate civil law to constitutional law? As much as I'd love for that to be the case, the reason why you can't equate theft of property to election fraud is because of the bindings of the laws and actions to which both cases belong.
The process of reconciliation in a civil theft case is the return of the property OR alternatively (and most likely) insurance compensation for the loss of property. Why? Because that's the nuance that was decided upon as part of the process, part of the law.
Constitutional law isn't exactly the same. You have more variables. You have different confines of those laws, different reconciliation of the "crime".
Then you have a situation where the military could (but probably won't) get involved and their laws and standards of proof.
You have so many other things to consider in contemplation of Constitutional law. Not that law means a whole lot to those in power, it seems. You have that to consider too. Constitutional law is only as strong as those willing to enforce it and I don't know about you, but the military isn't very "strong" on anything. Ultimately they're the ones who would have to enforce it.
Not saying that it wouldn't happen, but you wanted people to reconcile and thus, reconcile I shall.
Biden wasn't elected constitutionally. Jan 6th confirmation was void and illegitimate. He isnt the president. Therefore he is a hostile insurgent. He will be removed and a new emergency election run by temporary MIL control for continuity of gov.
It is quite simple.
What happens when you GET CAUGHT cheating at a miss America pageant....?
Kinda depends on who catches on
NSFW? lol
California is a fucked up exception. In California, if you're caught stealing something under $950, you get a slap on the wrist. If you get caught stealing someone's home by occupying it for more than 30 days, and partially paying rent, you're legally entitled to stay.
How is this NSFW
Ahh, but what happens to you (us) very rarely happens to them...although methinks this is about to change on a grandiose scale (sealed indictments).
The strongest hint at how the constitution says a situation like this needs to be handled is implied with the 2nd Amendment.
Not only that, it is clearly treasonous- whats the punishment for that again..