Original Voat Post:
Pay close attention to the first 20-25 seconds. This event is approximately 8-10 minutes after impact detonation.
A thick plume of rapidly ejected white smoke means what? ( incendiary device )
What building materials could possibly cause this phenomenon? ( none )
Look at man near triage blanket in foreground. Why is he worried ( hands to head ), why does reverse direction twice, and then hesitate before proceeding?
VIDEO:
There were no planes that flew into anything on 911. There are no plane parts.
ABSOLUTELY AGREE.
I recall a news crew in LA that went to LAX to interview families of victims that were waiting to receive their loved ones when their planes landed.
THERE WAS NO ONE THERE WAITING FOR ANYONE FROM THE FLIGHT(s).
When the airport authorities realized this, they called an emergency and shut down access to the terminal.
At 3:42 you can clearly see that building is almost completely intact. It's quite a while later that the facade falls down and makes it look like a bigger area.
A missile hit the Pentagon on that day. I also believe the flight that went into the ground at Shanksville was supposed to hit building 7. But due to an error, it didn't and so they had no choice but to use the secondary device and bring it down with dems.
I would love to know the answer to this riddle:
A novice, first year 'pilot' who TWICE failed their final testing in a single engine Cessna, somehow manages to maneuver a full sized commercial aircraft from 28,000 feet to ZERO in under 8 minutes, while travelling at FULL speed, while manipulating a 270 degree turn and still manages to perfectly hit his target.
The white smoke could easily be from any number of pressurized pipes for the Pentagon.
While your response makes a plausible point, and is the kind of critical thinking that should be uses on every angle of this (which is why I hope you brought it up), at the end of the day there were no wing marks on the Pentagon, compare to trade center, just a round hole. With all thos cameras arou d the Pentagon they would produce no footage of the plane. Just ground debris that looked ataged days later. Oh of course we could go on for ever.
I've only looked at the video briefly, but is it possible that the 'smoke' is actually steam. A burst water pipe and a lot of heat could potentially create that effect.
Agreed, and that could be the case in that video.
bullshit
The origin is clearly outside the building
Not relevant. There was no plane that hit the Pentagon. Not possible.
A) The plane at that speed and altitude would rip itself apart before the collision
B) the Top of the hole (photographed before collapse) was not tall enough for that plane to have been the cause without the wheels digging into the ground
C) The 4 frames of video showing the object hit was moving parallel to the ground and confirms far too small for a commercial airline
I could go further.
I also seem to recall there was a video of a helicopter that fired a missile, no idea if it was genuine or still available.
I almost forgot about that, but yes, that video does exist somewhere. I'm sure it's been thoroughly scrubbed.
But it was like the helicopter and the (presumably) missile was going and accelerated until it hit.
Is it possible the wheels were still in "up" position at time of impact?
It doesn't even matter, with wheels up the engines would be digging in the ground, possibly the fuselage as well.
But, even if we entertain that flight 77 actually hit the Pentagon, the metal (other than the engines, which DID NOT break through the outer wall) could not break through 9 reinforced concrete walls and only burst a hole to the inner area.
You know, these types of questions coming up makes me want to dig up my 15 your old computer to track down the extensive research I've done on this subject.
Even though the Pentagon was the most ambiguous of the attacks (ambiguous in that it was difficult to come to solid conclusions one way or another).
Should add that I've long believed it was a missile. Pilots pretty much proved a passenger jet would be impossible
wrong
official story has the plane completely inside the building
you are going against 99% of anons who believe NO PLANE at Pentagon
Planes can't cause enough damage to a well-constructed building. As an example, a bomber flew into the Empire State Building in NYC, and it got part way in and was just stuck. It was later winched down and the building repaired.
steel building vs aluminium plane. no contest.