Won’t be long until they will also be forced to introduce the phrase leaky vaccine. They are imperfect and leaky, and the leaky part is what’s really going to be the issues.
The Pfizer vax is 95% effective if you go by the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) calculation, which is what is highlighted. But if you go by the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) it's only 0.84% effective.
The first considers only infected individuals in the test and control groups, while the second considers the entire population of both groups. Here's a chart.
I can't help wondering how many vaxxed people I know will make it through to next year. Bracing myself for the worst: one has already started going downhill and looks to have aged by 20 years.
"Consider the hypothetical world where absolutely everyone had received a less than perfect vaccine. Although the death rate would be low, everyone who died would have been fully vaccinated."
Or consider the actually totally real world where absolutely everyone just got the actual virus. Although the death rate is actually low, everyone who died has their death greatly exaggerated and paraded around 24/7 on the news.
No problem; this simply means that EVERYONE needs to take the pharmaceutical industry's new and improved vaccine that will surely eradicate this deadly plague!
Oh, okay, I am glad its going as planned ....
Proof that they think we’re all stupid?
was hoping someone would post this. This article makes them look stupider
They are also saying that those over 50 without the needle are less likely to die of the virus than those that have had 2 shots?
Also they state this is an imperfect vaccine yet then try and tell the public it's 95% effective, well which way round is it?
It's a ticking time bom - b if you ask me. I've already lost a friend after the needle due to a heart attack, can it be linked, unlikely.
The injection was already a form of IQ test. Now it is even more obvious. "Effective but imperfect"? FFS.
Won’t be long until they will also be forced to introduce the phrase leaky vaccine. They are imperfect and leaky, and the leaky part is what’s really going to be the issues.
The Pfizer vax is 95% effective if you go by the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) calculation, which is what is highlighted. But if you go by the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) it's only 0.84% effective.
The first considers only infected individuals in the test and control groups, while the second considers the entire population of both groups. Here's a chart.
I can't help wondering how many vaxxed people I know will make it through to next year. Bracing myself for the worst: one has already started going downhill and looks to have aged by 20 years.
Ahem: [ARCHIVE PLEASE] (https://greatawakening.win/p/12j03rbCNe/archive-your-linkshares-from-cab/)
you are funding the guardian this way. Dont give em money if you want to teach them a lesson!
Thanks so much, i'll use it from now on.
"Consider the hypothetical world where absolutely everyone had received a less than perfect vaccine. Although the death rate would be low, everyone who died would have been fully vaccinated."
Or consider the actually totally real world where absolutely everyone just got the actual virus. Although the death rate is actually low, everyone who died has their death greatly exaggerated and paraded around 24/7 on the news.
We had good intentions...next time it will be better. We learn from our mistakes, sorry millions died, but we are human too.
No problem; this simply means that EVERYONE needs to take the pharmaceutical industry's new and improved vaccine that will surely eradicate this deadly plague!
Ridiculous ???