‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Never trust a hippo taking an oath
This is indelible in my Hippocampus.
☝🏻👏🤓
Technically they're not doing harm. They're just not doing all the good they could do.
That's not anywhere close to being even technically true.
The truth is that big pharma is in fact a major arm of the world cabal and is teamed with the food industry to kill off huge numbers of human beings.
Consider the cancer industry . . .
Consider the American diet and diabetes . . .
Consider the "vaccines" . . .
"They're just not doing all the good they could do"?
Their "good" is sickness, profit and death.
Shows that a psychopath is running things there? No empathy, no conscience.
It may be if it was severely downsized. People in good health will still have accidents, women will still have babies, etc.
I suppose that’s fair, yes.
But I also think that it grossly oversimplifies how easy it is to cure literally anything over the course of the entire human race. I don’t think that most doctors are deliberately slow-footing their jobs to stay in business.
I think that it’s more that diseases don’t just go away, that the only things we’ve truly cured usually involve vaccines (and we know how popular those are), and that some doctors just aren’t good at their jobs.
To me, that’s more an argument that medicine shouldn’t be a business than suspiciously eyeballing the doctors themselves. Considering how much of the medical school application involves your ability to pay for the process, the college classes, the EC stuff, the test prep, and for medical school itself, it’s no wonder our talent pool is mostly limited to who can afford to take on a job that requires altruism than who would be truly qualified for the job.
Not to mention, a lot of people are attracted to the medical field simply for the money, and not for any noble reasons like wanting to truly help someone. I think you would get doctors who were more dedicated to helping people if they didn't make so much money -- this would weed out some of the greedy doctors.
Absolutely. But that means removing the cost for medical school and drastically curbing how medical malpractice works, because it does cost a fortune to be a doctor in the US.
When you get down to it, ALL colleges need to be more affordable.
Medical malpractice fees would probably go down if, instead of covering for those bad doctors, they actually pulled their licenses -- permanently. I'm sure a lot of this gets swept under the carpet. And, on the other side of the coin, there are probably a lot of people crying wolf on the doctors just to get some money. There should be reasonable limits to how much money they get, but only if they truly deserve it.
Well, I’d beg to differ. If they were NOT slowly killing us, and stealing our money, we’d work very hard and produce... and buy...
... and pay taxes....
We are a very valuable “asset. “
A patient cured is a customer lost.
Agitprop by people financing the biotechs that profitably sicken people(and keep them sick), as well as get them addicted to and dependent on drugs.
Basically a flex showing how they can mock their victims and still get away with it.
Gee, Idk. Is educating customers towards proper operation and care of their cars a sustainable business model for a small-town automotive repair shop? Ask me how I worked myself straight out of business...
If you were an honest mechanic you belong in a museum of rare species.
Honest, fast, invisible, it pays the bills...
Perhaps it shouldn't be a business???
Well - rather the business shall be keeping people healthy.
Simply to make this possible they shall not get money for curing,but for people being healthy. But making it so is much more complicated,it couldn't be simple insurance model. And nobody would want to pay while staying healthy... Complicated. And some people would call it "socialism" (but come on - what is federal government's military ?).Moreover the question is: pay HOW MUCH ?...
There is no simple solution as fully commercial healthcare costs can be high (USA),and socialist-like healthcare (Post socialist countries) is not effective - low quality and long waiting, less and less nurses and medicals...
Maybe money shall be paid in instalments after therapy from some fund/bank account ? Maybe costs of therapies shall be audited,and in case of excessive number of tests hospitals shall be sued ?/ patient or patient family choosing what tests shall be done and discounts for reducing the tests at the cost of taking greater risk at patient responsibility ? I don't know.
Or, perhaps sustainability shouldn't be the goal?
Ooo do Vaccines next: Dec 15 2020: “Ten Year Study: Unvaccinated Children Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers” https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/12/ten-year-study-unvaccinated-children-far-healthier-than-their-vaccinated-peers/
4-27-21 video “Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier?” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/do-vaccines-make-us-healthier/
Vaccines come out during the natural progression of a disease and: https://www.heartcom.org/VaccineInfo_files/image001.jpg
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/goldman-asks-is-curing-patients-a-sustainable-business-model.html
Surprised how old this article is. Thanks for sharing
Here is the archive version: https://archive.vn/JcWEg
Profit over patients, always.
As if they don't already know!
You know what's scary?
The opposite of this question is an answer.
"creating patients is a sustainable business model"
Think about that. It's the other side of the coin. They're evil.
It’s no they wouldn’t get no business at all.
But real approaches to health don’t have anything to do with interrupting the natural healing processes of the body with chemical drugs.
Medicine should never be a business model.
As Ross would say, ". . . bidness is bidness".
But the larger issue is that Big Pharma is a killer industry on the rampage.
How many natural medicine practitioners have been murdered in the past ten years?
The number is shocking.
Still only “suggesting,” but pretty much saying the quiet part out loud.
This right here is why you don't donate the dollar to "cure cancer" - they just admitted it right here. They don't want cancer cured. It makes them way too much money for that to happen.
No. Act accordingly.
“Health” “care”