/u/ARandomOgre sounds like a disgruntled, unhinged cuck who have bulls ream his wife on the daily while channeling his anger for not being able to satisfy his wife, into writing fanfiction about PedoJoe (like the one you posted above) and sipping soy lattes then make a gaping mouth expression when his wife screams out one of the bulls' names.
That manlet clearly have no life and has been basing everything on lies. One day "he" will wake up and realize everything has been a sham and will get in a fetal position and cry for eternity.
Well, one of us is definitely wrong. One of us is definitely going to feel stupid at the end of this.
The end of this for me is when Q takes over and the Storm arrives and Trump is back in the White House. Pretty easy for me to admit when I’ve lost, because it will be obvious.
Luckily for me, my life wouldn’t change much, so I have nothing to lose by being wrong.
The end of this for you would be whenever it becomes obvious that Q isn’t coming back and there is no plan.
While it’s easy for everyone to see if I’m wrong, I’m not sure it’s easy for anyone to tell if you’re wrong. Depends on how long you think the Plan can take, I suppose.
Either way, I’m happy waiting to see what happens.
Another conjecture based on no evidence... I thought lefties were all about the “science” and “facts”. It looks more like mental gymnastics to pretend there was no voter and election fraud in the face of the mountain of evidence that exists.
"We don't put signs in our yards or bumper stickers on our cars because Biden is just a politician, we aren't vain like that!"
Meanwhile in 2008, 2012, and 2016, Obama stickers on every bumper possible, Hillary stickers on every bumper possible, "Hope" Obama signs everywhere, Hillary signs on every dorm door I saw in 2016. Yeah, totally not vain.
I even see a few Biden stickers on car bumpers, and usually the cars belong to boomer women who have no children and they also have other stickers like Rosie the Riveter and BLM stickers, and I can't help but think how failed their lives are to be in a position to have so many bumper stickers on their cars like a 16 year old, still supporting the Dems after 50+ years, and acting superior because of it. It really sickens me. When did those doctors say the vax was going to start offing people in droves? Why aren't these the types of people to be offed first?
I honestly believed this more than pure election fraud, and believed that the fraud he was talking about was the fake news media and the ability to lie about him.
We have to remember that one of the big end goals of q is to release the truth of everyone in power and all the lies; including the last 16 months with covid, 5 years with Trump, and century plus of lies. Therefore all these NPCs will get revealed the truth one day
Biden spending more time campaigning to stop audits than campaigning for POTUS makes me believe that there was true mass voter fraud of the numbers more than anything else.
You know, you keep posting my stuff over here that I specifically write over there to avoid directly debunking you over here, and the mods are going to suspect you’re in cahoots with me toward some more underhanded purpose.
You're not deboonking anything. Your take is just an assumption, a theory. I wonder, why is fraud so impossible to you? If everyone hated Trump as much as you did, then why is it so outrageous to think that his haters would go to extraordinary lengths to get him out of office, even if that includes cheating?
Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
With respect, people were telling me 100% there was no chance Biden was getting anywhere near the White House on Inauguration Day, and that I would be so surprised and they’d be laughing so hard when I saw I was wrong.
Look, why don’t we wait to see what actually happens with the audit before you start putting all your eggs in that basket.
Assuming the audit has already incontestably proven what you believe before the courts have even had a chance to review and the opposition a chance to defend themselves it is one step above datefagging, and there is a reason datefagging is frowned upon here.
Also, it surprises me that you care so much about bellwethers in a Trump election. The man clearly upsets the normal predictive algorithms for elections. You’re cherry-picking which election predictors you want to believe are credible in order to support your argument. I rightfully had no faith in anyone’s ability to predict how Trump would do in either election.
But I don’t hear a position, take on that position, and then try to prove it. That’s where “trust, but verify” gets you.
I assume everyone is lying, including Trump, including Q, and force them to prove their arguments.
Verify, THEN trust.
That’s the only way to avoid being manipulated by people who lie to you. It’s the only way to avoid fake news.
Verify, THEN trust.
I am in the process of trying and failing to prove Trump’s claim about massive election fraud affecting the results. I do not think it’s impossible, but I can’t prove it using any of the evidence circling around this board.
And apparently, neither can any lawyer that has worked for your movement.
Maybe that will change, and when I see evidence in the future that election fraud changed the outcome, I will amend my beliefs.
But I verify, THEN trust. And so far, that has stopped me from accepting the vast majority of the evidence on this issue that you guys are willing to accept.
We are both looking forward to the audit results and the evidence they uncover.
The problem is there was no debunking. Just another baseless mockingbird opinion to help with the mountain of evidence proving China Joe didn’t really win the election.
It’s ok, we will be here for you when you’ve accepted reality.
But I try to be respectful of your space when I’m here, and you deciding to keep bringing Reddit stuff over here is basically overriding how I’m choosing to balance my life out. Which is fine.
I just wouldn’t blame the mods for suspecting that you’re trying to shoehorn my Reddit stuff over here for some obscured reason. You didn’t even do a tiny-text debunk on this one.
I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
You’re the one trying to convince me of a point. You’re the one trying to cause a great awakening.
Why don’t you go out, walk down the street with a picture of Joe Biden, and film the results? One long take, no cuts, no editing. Go to multiple places in town, get a variety of demographics in your video.
Then you will have made more credible evidence than the video you showed me.
No need to tiny-text debunk your post because everything you said is wrong. You're entitled to your own opinion, even if your opinion is wrong. He just posted it for all of us to see how wrong you are on everything, which in turn, you have debunked yourself.
/u/ARandomOgre sounds like a disgruntled, unhinged cuck who have bulls ream his wife on the daily while channeling his anger for not being able to satisfy his wife, into writing fanfiction about PedoJoe (like the one you posted above) and sipping soy lattes then make a gaping mouth expression when his wife screams out one of the bulls' names.
That manlet clearly have no life and has been basing everything on lies. One day "he" will wake up and realize everything has been a sham and will get in a fetal position and cry for eternity.
I almost feel sorry for him... Almost.
Well, one of us is definitely wrong. One of us is definitely going to feel stupid at the end of this.
The end of this for me is when Q takes over and the Storm arrives and Trump is back in the White House. Pretty easy for me to admit when I’ve lost, because it will be obvious.
Luckily for me, my life wouldn’t change much, so I have nothing to lose by being wrong.
The end of this for you would be whenever it becomes obvious that Q isn’t coming back and there is no plan.
While it’s easy for everyone to see if I’m wrong, I’m not sure it’s easy for anyone to tell if you’re wrong. Depends on how long you think the Plan can take, I suppose.
Either way, I’m happy waiting to see what happens.
u/#Honkler
Another conjecture based on no evidence... I thought lefties were all about the “science” and “facts”. It looks more like mental gymnastics to pretend there was no voter and election fraud in the face of the mountain of evidence that exists.
"We don't put signs in our yards or bumper stickers on our cars because Biden is just a politician, we aren't vain like that!"
Meanwhile in 2008, 2012, and 2016, Obama stickers on every bumper possible, Hillary stickers on every bumper possible, "Hope" Obama signs everywhere, Hillary signs on every dorm door I saw in 2016. Yeah, totally not vain.
I even see a few Biden stickers on car bumpers, and usually the cars belong to boomer women who have no children and they also have other stickers like Rosie the Riveter and BLM stickers, and I can't help but think how failed their lives are to be in a position to have so many bumper stickers on their cars like a 16 year old, still supporting the Dems after 50+ years, and acting superior because of it. It really sickens me. When did those doctors say the vax was going to start offing people in droves? Why aren't these the types of people to be offed first?
BlueAnon make my head hurt. It must be tiring all the hoops they jump through
I honestly believed this more than pure election fraud, and believed that the fraud he was talking about was the fake news media and the ability to lie about him.
We have to remember that one of the big end goals of q is to release the truth of everyone in power and all the lies; including the last 16 months with covid, 5 years with Trump, and century plus of lies. Therefore all these NPCs will get revealed the truth one day
Biden spending more time campaigning to stop audits than campaigning for POTUS makes me believe that there was true mass voter fraud of the numbers more than anything else.
You know, you keep posting my stuff over here that I specifically write over there to avoid directly debunking you over here, and the mods are going to suspect you’re in cahoots with me toward some more underhanded purpose.
You're not deboonking anything. Your take is just an assumption, a theory. I wonder, why is fraud so impossible to you? If everyone hated Trump as much as you did, then why is it so outrageous to think that his haters would go to extraordinary lengths to get him out of office, even if that includes cheating?
Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
No, I didn’t say that either.
I said cheating could have happened. I’m saying there is a nonzero possibility that there was major election fraud.
You are confusing a recognition of the impossibility of proving a negative with an endorsement of the positive.
With respect, people were telling me 100% there was no chance Biden was getting anywhere near the White House on Inauguration Day, and that I would be so surprised and they’d be laughing so hard when I saw I was wrong.
Look, why don’t we wait to see what actually happens with the audit before you start putting all your eggs in that basket.
Assuming the audit has already incontestably proven what you believe before the courts have even had a chance to review and the opposition a chance to defend themselves it is one step above datefagging, and there is a reason datefagging is frowned upon here.
Also, it surprises me that you care so much about bellwethers in a Trump election. The man clearly upsets the normal predictive algorithms for elections. You’re cherry-picking which election predictors you want to believe are credible in order to support your argument. I rightfully had no faith in anyone’s ability to predict how Trump would do in either election.
It’s not impossible in the least.
But I don’t hear a position, take on that position, and then try to prove it. That’s where “trust, but verify” gets you.
I assume everyone is lying, including Trump, including Q, and force them to prove their arguments.
Verify, THEN trust.
That’s the only way to avoid being manipulated by people who lie to you. It’s the only way to avoid fake news.
Verify, THEN trust.
I am in the process of trying and failing to prove Trump’s claim about massive election fraud affecting the results. I do not think it’s impossible, but I can’t prove it using any of the evidence circling around this board.
And apparently, neither can any lawyer that has worked for your movement.
Maybe that will change, and when I see evidence in the future that election fraud changed the outcome, I will amend my beliefs.
But I verify, THEN trust. And so far, that has stopped me from accepting the vast majority of the evidence on this issue that you guys are willing to accept.
We are both looking forward to the audit results and the evidence they uncover.
What about the 17 of the 22 cases Trump's team won? That's 75%+
all im seeing is REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
“Cases won” doesn’t tell us anything.
Have those cases proven widespread, election-changing fraud yet?
Not yet, as far as I have seen.
Have those cases further resulted in the world changing in a way in which you expect per Q’s plan?
Also, not as far as I’ve seen.
So I will keep waiting. Maybe the AZ audit will prove what you think it will and we’ll all be on the same page.
I did.
So pulling theories out of your ass is now considered debunking someone? Then you did it.
If you're an example of what we're up against I'm not worried at all, in fact I'm laughing so hard my sides hurt.
The problem is there was no debunking. Just another baseless mockingbird opinion to help with the mountain of evidence proving China Joe didn’t really win the election.
It’s ok, we will be here for you when you’ve accepted reality.
It doesn’t bother me in the least.
But I try to be respectful of your space when I’m here, and you deciding to keep bringing Reddit stuff over here is basically overriding how I’m choosing to balance my life out. Which is fine.
I just wouldn’t blame the mods for suspecting that you’re trying to shoehorn my Reddit stuff over here for some obscured reason. You didn’t even do a tiny-text debunk on this one.
I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
I don’t have a problem with a video.
I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
Why not you?
You’re the one trying to convince me of a point. You’re the one trying to cause a great awakening.
Why don’t you go out, walk down the street with a picture of Joe Biden, and film the results? One long take, no cuts, no editing. Go to multiple places in town, get a variety of demographics in your video.
Then you will have made more credible evidence than the video you showed me.
No need to tiny-text debunk your post because everything you said is wrong. You're entitled to your own opinion, even if your opinion is wrong. He just posted it for all of us to see how wrong you are on everything, which in turn, you have debunked yourself.
Go away you silly person. Just here for a good laugh.