As much as I am happy to see whistleblowers come forward about the vax, I wouldn't put it past the DS to respond with...."Ok, you're right. The vaccine is dangerous. Therefore, the only alternative is to lock down..."
Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65,
Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna
COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
(i) for the under-18 age category;
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.
So I was hoping that this case would be to get rid of the vaccines for everyone, not just the ones mentioned. I do like all the great information that the AFLDS put into this document. Good redpoll facts I have been wanting to dish out to some folks who think I'm the crazy one, all in one document.
Excellent document to red pill reasonable people. Share away!
As much as I am happy to see whistleblowers come forward about the vax, I wouldn't put it past the DS to respond with...."Ok, you're right. The vaccine is dangerous. Therefore, the only alternative is to lock down..."
They'll say the vaccine is dangerous and it's Trump's fault it's dangerous.
I know, I saw him mixing the vax with my own eyes!
Two Scoops!1!
I only heard DJT push the J&J vaccine---you know, the one Xiden banned!
Got to know if this is true. I did not know Biden banned 1.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/governors-question-biden-decision-jj-warn-potential-hit/story?id=77047860
pretty sure trump said all the vaccines were safe and effective
If he did, then we need to rethink the vaccines or accept Trump lied to us.
He also said quite a few times in press conferences "AstraZeneca, Moderns, Pfizer"
He supported all of them and touted all of them as he assured they would be done in time.
I used to support the vaccine when the media and the leftists were all saying not to get it.
So something definitely changed there.
Trump does not make vaccines.
That’s why the PCR cycle thresholds for every positive test need to be publicized.
If they admit the vax is dangerous, not only will they stab Big Pharma in the back, but they'll piss off the entire medical establishment
As said by the x22report, the Globalists and Big Pharma have different goals
The Globalists want the lockdowns to continue so they can get away with letting the economy crash and implement the Great Reset with no resistance
Big Pharma wants to sell the vaccines to everybody to maximize profits but doing so will force the end of the lockdowns against the globalists' plans.
So are the vaccines Gonna kill or not lmao you’re saying they actually do what they’re supposed to?
All will be blamed on Trump cutting corners, warp speed. He openly brags about getting the regulatory agencies to circumvent conventional procedures.
I bieve its the ph9ne number thing for most people
@RealGenFlynn
@ArizonaAudit
@linwoodspeakstruth
Another great one:
@SouthAfricaReports
Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
(i) for the under-18 age category;
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.
So I was hoping that this case would be to get rid of the vaccines for everyone, not just the ones mentioned. I do like all the great information that the AFLDS put into this document. Good redpoll facts I have been wanting to dish out to some folks who think I'm the crazy one, all in one document.
Then why the heck are they still on the market? Boggles the mind.. so many things do that recently.
I hope this whistleblower is bringing the receipts.
Noooooooooo, evidence is racist, you bigot!!!!!!!!!!!
/s
Friend was canceled on IG after sharing this information so it must be true
https://t.me/RealGenFlynn
Fantastic post. I urge everyone to read the entire lawsuit document.
Where's the archived copy of this letter? Some of us aren't in that honey pot known as Telegram
Very good information. Ty.