While it has gotten that bad, too...it's largely soft manipulations in methodology that absolutely would garner the result they are looking for, or outright awful conclusions that do not match well with the data presented.
I saw this often in the social sciences back in the late 00s when I was in college. When I would say anything about it, it would be met with some sort of "while you are technically correct, we feel the conclusion fits well with prior studies".
And I'm like....yeah, but the conclusion is supposed to reflect the current study...wtf.
It's interesting how black people committing more crime can be turned into "black people are discriminated against by the justice system and police". They both could be right based on how you frame the data.
Yeah it's a minority of black people doing most of black crime, but black criminals commit 50% of the murders. I would never take that to say that all black people are bad, but it is an interesting statistic considering the relative population size.
Everything's so on the money today, no pun intended. This is exactly what happened to science. Don't trust any news blurbs about what "all scientists say." Go find out who's doing real research without fudging results and see what they say about it.
If we aren't paying attention and fight the commies on every front, they will make this vaccination fully authorized by CDC and then they will mandate it. Speak up now or we will all suffer he consequences.
Agreed, then our local and state governments make them medical emergency "laws" or regulations that the health officers can/should enforce. The unelected making regulations is one of the ways the commies started their take-over; like the energy department, environmental department, education department, and on and on.
I must fabricate results. Fify
While it has gotten that bad, too...it's largely soft manipulations in methodology that absolutely would garner the result they are looking for, or outright awful conclusions that do not match well with the data presented.
I saw this often in the social sciences back in the late 00s when I was in college. When I would say anything about it, it would be met with some sort of "while you are technically correct, we feel the conclusion fits well with prior studies".
And I'm like....yeah, but the conclusion is supposed to reflect the current study...wtf.
Oh well, they aren't my people. I went my own way
It's interesting how black people committing more crime can be turned into "black people are discriminated against by the justice system and police". They both could be right based on how you frame the data.
Yeah it's a minority of black people doing most of black crime, but black criminals commit 50% of the murders. I would never take that to say that all black people are bad, but it is an interesting statistic considering the relative population size.
same "scientists" as the ones from Gulliver's Travels
These are the same people that would water crops with Gatorade
But Rondo's got what plants neeed
Plants love electrolytes!
It's got everything plants crave!
Learning about "now" should make you question "then", not assume that "now" is novel. This applies to many things.
Sad, but true.
Gotta RECOUP the cost of SPENDING 300k on student loans FOR gay gene tranny molecular chemistry degree SOME how, SAD. srs.
Can they please plug a camera into that microscope so we can see what COVID-19 looks like?
Everything's so on the money today, no pun intended. This is exactly what happened to science. Don't trust any news blurbs about what "all scientists say." Go find out who's doing real research without fudging results and see what they say about it.
I would bet this translates into the genetics field as well.
Likely they have all been given a directive to find that we are very similar genetically, when the truth is there is clear differences within humans.
Recently they made Cheddar man black so they could say that light skin was a recent genetic mutation.
At first I thought it needed to be corrected to say "their narrative" instead of "my narrative". Sadly, it's likely just as accurate as it is.
So True.
Who does the science that no one pays for? No one.
If we aren't paying attention and fight the commies on every front, they will make this vaccination fully authorized by CDC and then they will mandate it. Speak up now or we will all suffer he consequences.
"CDC" makes recommendations only.
Agreed, then our local and state governments make them medical emergency "laws" or regulations that the health officers can/should enforce. The unelected making regulations is one of the ways the commies started their take-over; like the energy department, environmental department, education department, and on and on.
I think they're both the last one.
Absolute truth from an actual lab rat.
Nailed it