What a complete embarrassment that it has to be Russian media that reports this.
All the US/British mainstream media including Fox News should delete themselves and find other jobs because they are 100% completely useless and don't deserve to ever tell us anything again.
The main stream is perfectly doing their job. Their job just isnt what we thought it was. Their job is to be the propaganda arm of the Cabal. We all know what happened to Goebbels and Goerring, so dont worry the day of reckoning will be here.
Can you see it yet? Can you sense it. The dominos are cascading right into their house of cards. I want to shout it from the rooftop yet I’d be faux-checked.
A little dig I did on "fact checkers" about 3 years ago...
About the “FACT CHECKERS”
Stating point: Meme that says Actor Denzel Washington said something very Pro-Trump.
Just wanna start by saying I accept that the alleged statement by Denzel Washington is bull. It’s pretty easy to find out if there are good grounds for information out there these days. I haven’t seen any grounds for considering this attribution factual at all.
On the other hand, I certainly do not need nor do I rely on what I consider strongly biased, if not illegitimate, fact checking sources like Snopes or Politifact. Here’s why.
If you investigate about the veracity of Snopes, you will find a number of things. I know of people who have actually looked at certain things Snopes posts, and found lots of falsity, manipulation and rather dubious content.
However, my interest is more on how Snopes became such a referred to organization, when there are clear biases in what they do and post. Here are a few interesting things I found.
Starting with Snopes, the veracity of Snopes is upheld by several so-called ‘fact checking’ organizations, including factcheck_org, other.
*Factcheck_org on Snopes Read what they have to say about Snopes - debunked, or upheld? Check also 'Clinton' 'Trump' and ask yourself, are they objective? Are they biased? Factcheck_org is a project of Annenberg Public Policy Center
*Annenberg Public Policy Center- Funded by Annenberg Foundation. Who else did Annenberg foundation fund? Chicago Annenberg Challenge
*[Chicago Annenberg Challenge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge) – APPC gave $50 million to Bill Ayers to found a 'philanthropic' org in Chicago (CAC) with Barack Hussain Obama as the founding Chairman of the Board.
*Bill Ayers? ('educator, anti-war activist, academic' aka Cultural Marxist)
Now, another noteworthy fact is that Factcheck_org is a signatory of the International Fact-checking Network
*International Fact-checking Network(IFCN) Founded in 2015. Apparently cobbled together to reinforce an infrastructure that can combat the rise of Alt-Media and Citizen truth revealing. IFCN has numerous verified signatories, including Snopes and others. IFCN is a unit of Poynter Inst. for Media Studies.
*Poynter Institute for Media Studies Purports to be a "global leader in journalism". Seeing who they work with, however, one might have doubts.
Poynter launched an initiative to fact check health issues around the globe together with 'fact checking' websites Politifact and Africa Check. The initiative is funded by Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation.
*Politifact reports on Poynter Inst. initiative “to fact check claims about health....” has now moved to become part of Poynter
I’ll admit, the content above is in no way conclusive. On the other hand, in my opinion, it certainly establishes a reasonable foundation for questioning Snopes motives, aims, and other efforts to ‘shape’ the facts available on the net.
A few salient points:
Snopes is given credibility by Factcheck who is given credibility by the IFCN and Poynter, etc. With a global network now set up as fact-checkers, they can begin to reinforce themselves and hoodwink the unsuspecting into accepting validity and credibility of a "Ministry of Truth"
In addition, numerous other I.F.C.N. signatories including Snopes are being used by Facebook to block ‘fake news’, which in the Facebook definition includes conservative views on the net, etc.
Now, who do you trust? That’s the question. Me? Not Snopes. Not in a heartbeat. There are more reliable, and more effective ways, to check for truth and facts. It’s called making an effort.
Hmm ... Johnson ... Johnson ... where have I heard that name before?
Oh yeah ...
Robert Wood Johnson FOUNDED Johnson & Johnson.
Robert Wood Johnson II, son of Robert Wood Johnson, took over Johson & Johnson and built it into a huge drug company.
He then created the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which today is the world's largest foundation that is focused on "health care."
Johnson & Johnson is one of the 4 "Covid vaccine" manufactuerers.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is pushing pro-vaccine propaganda through Fakebook by claiming to be an "independent fact checker" for Covid vax info.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation currently owns $2 billion in stock in JNJ (Johnson & Johnson), down from about $8 billion recently (the numbers will fluctuate up and down, as they move money around over time, but during the big vax push, they owned A LOT of JNJ stock).
So ... who/what exactly is the "Annenberg Foundation?"
The foundation was founded by Walter H. Annenberg. Who was he?
He was a Deep State type
Appointed as Ambassador to the United Kingdom by Richard Nixon (note: Not just ANYBODY gets THAT particular ambassador appointment. Ambassdor to Zimbabwe? Who cares? Cameroon? Who cares? But the UK? ONLY an insider Deep State type would get THAT appointment)
Born to a Jewish family ...
Owned and/or had financial stakes in a lot of MEDIA companies: Philadelphia Enquirer, TV Guide, Daily Racing Form, Playboy, Saturday Evening Post, The Atlantic, Seventeen Magazine
During his tenure as U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom, he developed a close friendship with Queen Elizabeth II and other members of the royal family
People with the name Annenberg: Wallis Annenberg, Chairman & CEO, Gregory Annenberg Weingarten and Charles Annenberg Weingarten
What sort of "philanthropic work" is the Annenberg Foundation involved in?
They run the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. IOW: All those propaganda government ads (PSA's) on the TV and radio. That's them. Officially, it is the US taxpayer, but somebody has to RUN it -- and that's Annenberg.
They also fund a lot of PBS TV and radio programs.
Let us know if they take it down or put you in fake book jail. I would post it myself but I still have 21 days left in my 30 day jail for being a bully bc of inferring Lebron James was a prostitute for China (which he is).
What a complete embarrassment that it has to be Russian media that reports this.
All the US/British mainstream media including Fox News should delete themselves and find other jobs because they are 100% completely useless and don't deserve to ever tell us anything again.
The main stream is perfectly doing their job. Their job just isnt what we thought it was. Their job is to be the propaganda arm of the Cabal. We all know what happened to Goebbels and Goerring, so dont worry the day of reckoning will be here.
Well said, fren.
Also, great post OP!
Can you see it yet? Can you sense it. The dominos are cascading right into their house of cards. I want to shout it from the rooftop yet I’d be faux-checked.
Typo intentional I bet!
A little dig I did on "fact checkers" about 3 years ago...
About the “FACT CHECKERS”
Stating point: Meme that says Actor Denzel Washington said something very Pro-Trump.
Just wanna start by saying I accept that the alleged statement by Denzel Washington is bull. It’s pretty easy to find out if there are good grounds for information out there these days. I haven’t seen any grounds for considering this attribution factual at all.
On the other hand, I certainly do not need nor do I rely on what I consider strongly biased, if not illegitimate, fact checking sources like Snopes or Politifact. Here’s why.
If you investigate about the veracity of Snopes, you will find a number of things. I know of people who have actually looked at certain things Snopes posts, and found lots of falsity, manipulation and rather dubious content.
However, my interest is more on how Snopes became such a referred to organization, when there are clear biases in what they do and post. Here are a few interesting things I found.
Starting with Snopes, the veracity of Snopes is upheld by several so-called ‘fact checking’ organizations, including factcheck_org, other.
*Factcheck_org on Snopes Read what they have to say about Snopes - debunked, or upheld? Check also 'Clinton' 'Trump' and ask yourself, are they objective? Are they biased? Factcheck_org is a project of Annenberg Public Policy Center
*Annenberg Public Policy Center- Funded by Annenberg Foundation. Who else did Annenberg foundation fund? Chicago Annenberg Challenge
*[Chicago Annenberg Challenge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge) – APPC gave $50 million to Bill Ayers to found a 'philanthropic' org in Chicago (CAC) with Barack Hussain Obama as the founding Chairman of the Board.
*Bill Ayers? ('educator, anti-war activist, academic' aka Cultural Marxist) Now, another noteworthy fact is that Factcheck_org is a signatory of the International Fact-checking Network
*International Fact-checking Network(IFCN) Founded in 2015. Apparently cobbled together to reinforce an infrastructure that can combat the rise of Alt-Media and Citizen truth revealing. IFCN has numerous verified signatories, including Snopes and others. IFCN is a unit of Poynter Inst. for Media Studies.
*Poynter Institute for Media Studies Purports to be a "global leader in journalism". Seeing who they work with, however, one might have doubts.
Poynter launched an initiative to fact check health issues around the globe together with 'fact checking' websites Politifact and Africa Check. The initiative is funded by Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation.
*Africa Check - (Founded 2012, partners include Standard Bank and the Soros [Open Society Foundations] (https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/)
*Politifact reports on Poynter Inst. initiative “to fact check claims about health....” has now moved to become part of Poynter
I’ll admit, the content above is in no way conclusive. On the other hand, in my opinion, it certainly establishes a reasonable foundation for questioning Snopes motives, aims, and other efforts to ‘shape’ the facts available on the net.
A few salient points:
Snopes is given credibility by Factcheck who is given credibility by the IFCN and Poynter, etc. With a global network now set up as fact-checkers, they can begin to reinforce themselves and hoodwink the unsuspecting into accepting validity and credibility of a "Ministry of Truth"
In addition, numerous other I.F.C.N. signatories including Snopes are being used by Facebook to block ‘fake news’, which in the Facebook definition includes conservative views on the net, etc.
Now, who do you trust? That’s the question. Me? Not Snopes. Not in a heartbeat. There are more reliable, and more effective ways, to check for truth and facts. It’s called making an effort.
Ruh roh
What concerns me, is that this is from before Candace Owens lost her court case, so clearly, it doesn't matter to the legal system.
Hmm ... Johnson ... Johnson ... where have I heard that name before?
Oh yeah ...
Robert Wood Johnson FOUNDED Johnson & Johnson.
Robert Wood Johnson II, son of Robert Wood Johnson, took over Johson & Johnson and built it into a huge drug company.
He then created the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which today is the world's largest foundation that is focused on "health care."
Johnson & Johnson is one of the 4 "Covid vaccine" manufactuerers.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is pushing pro-vaccine propaganda through Fakebook by claiming to be an "independent fact checker" for Covid vax info.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation currently owns $2 billion in stock in JNJ (Johnson & Johnson), down from about $8 billion recently (the numbers will fluctuate up and down, as they move money around over time, but during the big vax push, they owned A LOT of JNJ stock).
It all comes full circle, eh?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wood_Johnson_I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wood_Johnson_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wood_Johnson_Foundation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_%26_Johnson
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/janssen/index.html
https://whalewisdom.com/filer/johnson-robert-wood-foundation#tabholdings_tab_link
More info --
The top donors to FactCheck.org in 2021 (so far) are:
https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/
So ... who/what exactly is the "Annenberg Foundation?"
The foundation was founded by Walter H. Annenberg. Who was he?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Annenberg
Who runs the Annenberg Foundation TODAY?
People with the name Annenberg: Wallis Annenberg, Chairman & CEO, Gregory Annenberg Weingarten and Charles Annenberg Weingarten
What sort of "philanthropic work" is the Annenberg Foundation involved in?
They run the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. IOW: All those propaganda government ads (PSA's) on the TV and radio. That's them. Officially, it is the US taxpayer, but somebody has to RUN it -- and that's Annenberg.
They also fund a lot of PBS TV and radio programs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annenberg_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_for_Public_Broadcasting
Facebook is in zero trouble at all.
They don’t call it the World Wide Web for nothing!
A few of my posts got fact checked by a Chinese media company
https://twitter.com/gawjus_g/status/1421058692963778566?s=20
Well, why doesn't that surprise anyone?
Liberals love money conspiracies,in this case it's not a conspiracy. It's a red pill cannon.
Let us know if they take it down or put you in fake book jail. I would post it myself but I still have 21 days left in my 30 day jail for being a bully bc of inferring Lebron James was a prostitute for China (which he is).
lol, sorry Fren, that is funny.
You my friend have won the internet, well done.