So does the HBO documentary even mention the Air Force One window proofs that Q posted to show continuity of source? Or do they just pretend that didn’t happen and then normie idiots who did none of their own research outside of watching a TV show on HBO come here thinking they’re the smartest guys in the room because THEY watch a little something called, ahem, H. B. O.
Just curious about the Air Force One window proofs. I haven't seen them yet. Just started going through the "Book of Q Proofs" pdf so haven't got very far yet. Are they in there?
Not sure about Book of Q Proofs, but look in the replies. u/Neverstoptrumping posted a link with more explanation. Praying Medic covered this in a video on YouTube back in the day, but that’s been deleted.
To be fair, most of us nonbelievers don’t think the photos prove Q was anywhere near AF1. I haven’t figured out how they’re supposed to prove anything.
Even if they are from AF1, professional photographers take hundreds of photos a session.
There are lots of professional photographers on AF1 literally every time the President uses it, taking thousands of photos, only a couple of which will ever be published. The rest probably end up on their blogs and in unedited Photobuckets and forgotten.
Fact is that there are almost certainly millions of photos of AF1 during Trump’s Presidency that are unpublished, and posting a couple of pictures of Trump that weren’t on CNN goes nowhere near proving Q was on that plane.
I have always been interested in smoking gun proof that Q MUST be an intelligence agent. I want to see a post that would have literally been impossible for a troll to write. But the supposed AF1 photos don’t really cut it for me.
Gee, I believe that falls under “Q Supporters ONLY” guideline? We don’t need to spend what little valuable time we get each day convincing or defending to a Reddit Q-denying faggot ANYTHING. You Sir, can fuck right-OFF 🖕🏻
LOL, they can take ZILLIONS of photos, lose 99.9996% in their "Photobuckets," but NONE of them them will show definitive proof of secret AF1 flights to N. Korea.
This "oh, I'm blind, and I makes teh different conclusions" act is wearing thin.
And I’m sure the thousands of proofs released by mike and co are not convincing enough for you too, if you were as smart as us you would realize that you’ve been lied to. And one day you’ll have to thank us for opening your eyes, we were the first to decipher the secret codes that super spy Q team sent us, it's funny to think that we are thought as crazy when it’s the rest of the world who is.
Do you really believe that Biden got millions of votes? My bet would be had maybe 25 millions votes maximum, Trump won
Instead of focusing on whether Q is legit or not, it would be better for everyone if you focused more on the crimes of the elite.
In the end, proof of Q is irrelevant. If you believe that almost all of the “news” outlets, including all the “right-wing” ones are flat out lying to you A LOT, then that’s what matters.
You believe your worst-case scenario is that Q is a psyop designed to pacify you.
But the non-Q world doesn’t even think Q is anybody. Just a troll. Just Watkins. Just some other unimpressive nobody.
Which is why they aren’t engaging with you. They aren’t scared of the truth. They just have absolutely no reason to invest their time and effort into the anonymous postings of a troll.
Proving Q’s identity as a high-level intelligence agent would be THE SINGLE GREATEST THING you could do to jumpstart the Great Awakening.
Because even if people thought Qposts are lunacy, they’ll still respect the credentials of someone who actually would have access to that info. At least enough to read his claims.
The world isn’t blind to the fact that rich criminals get away with stuff. We’ve all read Monte Cristo. We get it.
We just don’t have any reason to accept that Q has any special insight into this, because Q is an anonymous poster on the internet, and that’s literally all I can prove he is. Just an anonymous internet voice among billions.
You believe your worst-case scenario is that Q is a psyop designed to pacify you.
Actually, no I don’t, and I’ve never posted that ever.
But the non-Q world doesn’t even think Q is anybody. Just a troll. Just Watkins. Just some other unimpressive nobody.
I couldn’t care less, see my previous comment about what is more important.
Which is why they aren’t engaging with you.
Once again, I couldn’t care less. I don’t engage people on the street about Q, I engage them on the lies of the MSM and their controlled opposition, which is more important.
They aren’t scared of the truth. They just have absolutely no reason to invest their time and effort into the anonymous postings of a troll.
Once again, you conflate knowing truth with belief in Q. But I would say people who know the truth, and have read Q’s insight into that truth, are going to be closer to the truth, regardless of Q’s credentials, than someone who knows the truth, and has never heard of Q. This is just classic controlled-op counter narrative: attack the messenger and hope people ignore the message.
Proving Q’s identity as a high-level intelligence agent would be THE SINGLE GREATEST THING you could do to jumpstart the Great Awakening.
Yes but that path is denied by propaganda. Most people are programmed to search Qanon and the results are pages and pages of negative info about Q. If you think that’s the means to accomplish some great awakening, then you have no idea what drives this movement. Once again, uncovering the depths of the MSM lies to the public is of more importance, and most Q followers know how to do it without even mentioning Q.
The world isn’t blind to the fact that rich criminals get away with stuff. We’ve all read Monte Cristo. We get it.
And the MSM covers for them. I doubt you truly grasp the depths of the crimes involved and how coordinated they are, and level of government involvement with them, including the division tactics at play to pit you against me instead of the true criminals. And if you do, then you’re just here to troll for fun because you could care less.
There are plenty of rabbit holes that give just a glimpse of the evil we are dealing with to go down that existed before Q ever even posted. What we lacked before Q was guidance on what was bullshit and what was real. Sure, he was an anonymous poster and had no reason to be trusted, but when you piece the puzzle together understanding more fully how much we’ve been lied to by people we thought we could trust, the truth becomes apparent on its own. I’ve looked back at past world events I’ve lived through that made no sense to me at the time, that make a lot more sense now.
As I stated originally, proof of Q is meaningless at this stage. If that’s all you focus on then you ignore the reality of the situation and you completely misunderstand the message Q was trying to send to as many people as possible. There is a true reason Q content is attacked and heavily censored, and it’s not because of “fear of terrorism” or because “he’s a LARP” or “he’s a psyop”.
The amount of time you spend here is highly suspicious, don't you think?
What would motivate a person to spend hours on a forum full of people they disagree with, contributing nothing to the conversation, and taking brick after brick to the face in the form of logical retorts to your obtuse statements??
Surely no reasonable person would do what you do without achieving some sort of personal benefit. Maybe if a person were deathly afraid of Q being real, there could be a psychological factor. Fear is a hell of a motivator - even more so than cash.
But the supposed AF1 photos don’t really cut it for me.
You have a good point, i want to try and be as unbiased as possible.
The Q pic does not prove it was from AF1, or what time it was taken. Unless we can find social media posts from the same day of ppl filming the same cloud pattern, which we haven't.
If Q is a LARP then they had to pay someone to go on a flight in that area, or charter a small plane, or somehow find a picture that was never posted on the internet before. As Tin Eye shows the Q pic has never been on the internet before Q posted it.
And i would agree with you, that isn't impossible for a LARP to do. Just a lot of effort.
I have always been interested in smoking gun proof that Q MUST be an intelligence agent.
Q mentioned John McCain in 33 posts before his death, so here is my go at working out the probability of it being a random guess.
1,440 mins in a day, and 30 days in a month. So 1,440 * 30 == 43,200
But since Q made 33 posts about McCain, we can reduce the odds and divide by 33, since the Q community would've claimed this coincidence was impressive if it had been ANY of the 33 Q posts about McCain.
43,200 / 33 == 1,309
So that's a 1 in 1,309 chance of this timing coincidence being random, which means a 99.92% chance it ISN'T random.
Here is twitter proof that Q posted this before McCain's death, and didn't just alter/backdate the timestamps after he died.
What's ur opinion? Please feel free to criticize my methods at trying to work out the probability.
I can already think of 1 flaw. I haven't taken into account the other 5,000 Q posts.
Let's say hypothetically Q made 10,000,000 posts, in that case i would concede this was random, since with that many attempts you're bound to get a lucky "1 in a 1,000" guess correct eventually.
However Q only made 5,000 posts. Since there are 1,440 minutes in a day, we should expect an average of 4 Q posts with that exact minute. 8 of them do. And we should expect 0.11 posts to have the minute and that day of the month (25th at 6:28pm).
I’ve talked about McCain before, but I will take a look at your post and respond in the near future. Remind me if you don't see something in the near future, because your post deserves a response.
Flipping a quarter offers me a chance at both heads and tails. I know that I am just as likely to get heads as tails.
So if I flip a quarter 100 times, and 98 of those flips gave me a heads, then I know there's something weird going on, because I know that I should have "failed" a lot more of these trials.
We know all the variables in a coin flip, so we can calculate the probability of the coin flip.
The type of math you suggest isn't uncommon to Q theories, but here's an analog as to what you're doing:
You walk around the city at random for a week. Every time you find a coin that was made in 1976, you pick it up. You do not look for nor pay any attention to any other objects in the street.
At the end of the week, you tell me that you found 23 such coins from 1976. What are the odds of finding so many coins from that exact year? Surely it's impossible.
After all, quarters have been made since 1831. There's a few hundred million of these things in circulation at any time. If we do the math, the chances of finding 23 quarters from this particular year are very low, because there are SO MANY quarters out there, then it must mean something suspicious.
Except, of course, it doesn't in reality. Because you have no "fail" condition. You were looking for quarters that matched what you wanted to find. You weren't keeping track of the infinitely large number of opportunities when you could have found such a quarter and did not. You also know nothing about the variables of your city, the distribution of these quarters, and so forth.
This is the problem with trying to calculate probabilities of random events in the real world. Probability measurements always have to define exactly what they're measuring and keep track of the fail conditions.
But there are no fail conditions for Q. If a prophecy doesn't come true this month, then we'll try next month. Not this hour, maybe next hour. Not this year, maybe next year.
And for a guy who posts vague stuff for almost 5,000 posts over only a few years, then of COURSE you're going to be able to find some connections in timing.
Especially when the prophecy is, "One of this country's most famous senators who is one of only two Republicans who is resisting Trump and just shot down his healthcare strategy and is openly dying of cancer? Yeah, that guy will be in the news soon."
No duh.
This is why deltas will never be a convincing argument to nonbelievers. If someone is posting multiple times a day claiming that SOMETHING is going to happen, and you guys give Q the latitude to apply his prophecies over months and years, then that just looks like confirmation bias, nothing more.
If Hillary Clinton was actually arrested on October 30th of any year, would you be impressed or dismiss that as a random coincidence as well?
Because that is literally less odds than the McCain coincidence, only 1/365 chance of Q guessing a date of an arrest. Compared to 1/1,000 to guess the day and minute of McCain's death.
The purpose of the Air Force One window proof isn’t to prove that Q was on Air Force One, it was to prove that when the tripcodes/website changed, the “new” Q had access t the exact same unpublished photo set that the “old” Q had. It could be any picture of clouds out of any window to prove this and it being on Air Force One (we believe) is just a bonus.
How would you explain how Ron (or any imposter) could acquire a second photo in the same unpublished photo set that the original Q posted? I am open to a logical explanation but I don’t think there is one.
Like I said, can you say with absolute confidence that those photos don’t exist in some obscure Flickr account somewhere? You truly believe you can account for absolutely every photo of… clouds… that exists?
Wasn’t this exactly the same thing that happened with George News? People assumed that the photos were unique, until someone found the raw photos in the random account of some random military photographer or something?
I just can’t accept on faith that a photo from one of the most photographed planes on the planet with hundreds of photographers cycling through it all the time is smoking-gun proof.
So a Google image search could not find the photo set of clouds, but somehow Ron Watkins tracked it down? What did he do? Just look through millions of private Flickr accounts until he found the exact same unpublished photo set? Come on man - think!
I’m running out of day to talk about this stuff in detail (harder for non-Q people to justify spending all day talking Q), but if you send me the pictures and evidence you want me to look at, I promise to do so relatively soon.
you are the one saying the disproof. read the comments in here with a link and explanation provided above your comment. it has the photos with explanation. its the proof that code monkey is not Q.
So does the HBO documentary even mention the Air Force One window proofs that Q posted to show continuity of source? Or do they just pretend that didn’t happen and then normie idiots who did none of their own research outside of watching a TV show on HBO come here thinking they’re the smartest guys in the room because THEY watch a little something called, ahem, H. B. O.
Just curious about the Air Force One window proofs. I haven't seen them yet. Just started going through the "Book of Q Proofs" pdf so haven't got very far yet. Are they in there?
Check out "Ultimate Q Proofs Volume 1" on Rumble. It took me from being Q-neutral to being bi-Qurious.
kek
Not sure about Book of Q Proofs, but look in the replies. u/Neverstoptrumping posted a link with more explanation. Praying Medic covered this in a video on YouTube back in the day, but that’s been deleted.
To be fair, most of us nonbelievers don’t think the photos prove Q was anywhere near AF1. I haven’t figured out how they’re supposed to prove anything.
Even if they are from AF1, professional photographers take hundreds of photos a session.
There are lots of professional photographers on AF1 literally every time the President uses it, taking thousands of photos, only a couple of which will ever be published. The rest probably end up on their blogs and in unedited Photobuckets and forgotten.
Fact is that there are almost certainly millions of photos of AF1 during Trump’s Presidency that are unpublished, and posting a couple of pictures of Trump that weren’t on CNN goes nowhere near proving Q was on that plane.
I have always been interested in smoking gun proof that Q MUST be an intelligence agent. I want to see a post that would have literally been impossible for a troll to write. But the supposed AF1 photos don’t really cut it for me.
I think he means him and his sock-puppets.
Yes.
Gee, I believe that falls under “Q Supporters ONLY” guideline? We don’t need to spend what little valuable time we get each day convincing or defending to a Reddit Q-denying faggot ANYTHING. You Sir, can fuck right-OFF 🖕🏻
Thought the flair the mods helpfully provided in bright red letters would have given it away, but I will no longer operate under that assumption.
LOL, they can take ZILLIONS of photos, lose 99.9996% in their "Photobuckets," but NONE of them them will show definitive proof of secret AF1 flights to N. Korea.
This "oh, I'm blind, and I makes teh different conclusions" act is wearing thin.
And I’m sure the thousands of proofs released by mike and co are not convincing enough for you too, if you were as smart as us you would realize that you’ve been lied to. And one day you’ll have to thank us for opening your eyes, we were the first to decipher the secret codes that super spy Q team sent us, it's funny to think that we are thought as crazy when it’s the rest of the world who is. Do you really believe that Biden got millions of votes? My bet would be had maybe 25 millions votes maximum, Trump won
Airman Lindell says Biden received 68million votes.
I would bet he got 4 or 5 millions at most
Instead of focusing on whether Q is legit or not, it would be better for everyone if you focused more on the crimes of the elite.
In the end, proof of Q is irrelevant. If you believe that almost all of the “news” outlets, including all the “right-wing” ones are flat out lying to you A LOT, then that’s what matters.
Oh, I disagree.
You believe your worst-case scenario is that Q is a psyop designed to pacify you.
But the non-Q world doesn’t even think Q is anybody. Just a troll. Just Watkins. Just some other unimpressive nobody.
Which is why they aren’t engaging with you. They aren’t scared of the truth. They just have absolutely no reason to invest their time and effort into the anonymous postings of a troll.
Proving Q’s identity as a high-level intelligence agent would be THE SINGLE GREATEST THING you could do to jumpstart the Great Awakening.
Because even if people thought Qposts are lunacy, they’ll still respect the credentials of someone who actually would have access to that info. At least enough to read his claims.
The world isn’t blind to the fact that rich criminals get away with stuff. We’ve all read Monte Cristo. We get it.
We just don’t have any reason to accept that Q has any special insight into this, because Q is an anonymous poster on the internet, and that’s literally all I can prove he is. Just an anonymous internet voice among billions.
Actually, no I don’t, and I’ve never posted that ever.
I couldn’t care less, see my previous comment about what is more important.
Once again, I couldn’t care less. I don’t engage people on the street about Q, I engage them on the lies of the MSM and their controlled opposition, which is more important.
Once again, you conflate knowing truth with belief in Q. But I would say people who know the truth, and have read Q’s insight into that truth, are going to be closer to the truth, regardless of Q’s credentials, than someone who knows the truth, and has never heard of Q. This is just classic controlled-op counter narrative: attack the messenger and hope people ignore the message.
Yes but that path is denied by propaganda. Most people are programmed to search Qanon and the results are pages and pages of negative info about Q. If you think that’s the means to accomplish some great awakening, then you have no idea what drives this movement. Once again, uncovering the depths of the MSM lies to the public is of more importance, and most Q followers know how to do it without even mentioning Q.
And the MSM covers for them. I doubt you truly grasp the depths of the crimes involved and how coordinated they are, and level of government involvement with them, including the division tactics at play to pit you against me instead of the true criminals. And if you do, then you’re just here to troll for fun because you could care less.
There are plenty of rabbit holes that give just a glimpse of the evil we are dealing with to go down that existed before Q ever even posted. What we lacked before Q was guidance on what was bullshit and what was real. Sure, he was an anonymous poster and had no reason to be trusted, but when you piece the puzzle together understanding more fully how much we’ve been lied to by people we thought we could trust, the truth becomes apparent on its own. I’ve looked back at past world events I’ve lived through that made no sense to me at the time, that make a lot more sense now.
As I stated originally, proof of Q is meaningless at this stage. If that’s all you focus on then you ignore the reality of the situation and you completely misunderstand the message Q was trying to send to as many people as possible. There is a true reason Q content is attacked and heavily censored, and it’s not because of “fear of terrorism” or because “he’s a LARP” or “he’s a psyop”.
The amount of time you spend here is highly suspicious, don't you think?
What would motivate a person to spend hours on a forum full of people they disagree with, contributing nothing to the conversation, and taking brick after brick to the face in the form of logical retorts to your obtuse statements??
Surely no reasonable person would do what you do without achieving some sort of personal benefit. Maybe if a person were deathly afraid of Q being real, there could be a psychological factor. Fear is a hell of a motivator - even more so than cash.
You have a good point, i want to try and be as unbiased as possible.
The Q pic does not prove it was from AF1, or what time it was taken. Unless we can find social media posts from the same day of ppl filming the same cloud pattern, which we haven't.
If Q is a LARP then they had to pay someone to go on a flight in that area, or charter a small plane, or somehow find a picture that was never posted on the internet before. As Tin Eye shows the Q pic has never been on the internet before Q posted it.
And i would agree with you, that isn't impossible for a LARP to do. Just a lot of effort.
What's your opinion on the Q post coinciding with John McCain's death to the EXACT minute and day of the month?
Q mentioned John McCain in 33 posts before his death, so here is my go at working out the probability of it being a random guess.
1,440 mins in a day, and 30 days in a month. So 1,440 * 30 == 43,200
But since Q made 33 posts about McCain, we can reduce the odds and divide by 33, since the Q community would've claimed this coincidence was impressive if it had been ANY of the 33 Q posts about McCain.
43,200 / 33 == 1,309
So that's a 1 in 1,309 chance of this timing coincidence being random, which means a 99.92% chance it ISN'T random.
Here is twitter proof that Q posted this before McCain's death, and didn't just alter/backdate the timestamps after he died.
What's ur opinion? Please feel free to criticize my methods at trying to work out the probability.
I can already think of 1 flaw. I haven't taken into account the other 5,000 Q posts.
Let's say hypothetically Q made 10,000,000 posts, in that case i would concede this was random, since with that many attempts you're bound to get a lucky "1 in a 1,000" guess correct eventually.
However Q only made 5,000 posts. Since there are 1,440 minutes in a day, we should expect an average of 4 Q posts with that exact minute. 8 of them do. And we should expect 0.11 posts to have the minute and that day of the month (25th at 6:28pm).
Only one post does, and it just so happens to be directly about John McCain.
I’ve talked about McCain before, but I will take a look at your post and respond in the near future. Remind me if you don't see something in the near future, because your post deserves a response.
Flipping a quarter offers me a chance at both heads and tails. I know that I am just as likely to get heads as tails.
So if I flip a quarter 100 times, and 98 of those flips gave me a heads, then I know there's something weird going on, because I know that I should have "failed" a lot more of these trials.
We know all the variables in a coin flip, so we can calculate the probability of the coin flip.
The type of math you suggest isn't uncommon to Q theories, but here's an analog as to what you're doing:
You walk around the city at random for a week. Every time you find a coin that was made in 1976, you pick it up. You do not look for nor pay any attention to any other objects in the street.
At the end of the week, you tell me that you found 23 such coins from 1976. What are the odds of finding so many coins from that exact year? Surely it's impossible.
After all, quarters have been made since 1831. There's a few hundred million of these things in circulation at any time. If we do the math, the chances of finding 23 quarters from this particular year are very low, because there are SO MANY quarters out there, then it must mean something suspicious.
Except, of course, it doesn't in reality. Because you have no "fail" condition. You were looking for quarters that matched what you wanted to find. You weren't keeping track of the infinitely large number of opportunities when you could have found such a quarter and did not. You also know nothing about the variables of your city, the distribution of these quarters, and so forth.
This is the problem with trying to calculate probabilities of random events in the real world. Probability measurements always have to define exactly what they're measuring and keep track of the fail conditions.
But there are no fail conditions for Q. If a prophecy doesn't come true this month, then we'll try next month. Not this hour, maybe next hour. Not this year, maybe next year.
And for a guy who posts vague stuff for almost 5,000 posts over only a few years, then of COURSE you're going to be able to find some connections in timing.
Especially when the prophecy is, "One of this country's most famous senators who is one of only two Republicans who is resisting Trump and just shot down his healthcare strategy and is openly dying of cancer? Yeah, that guy will be in the news soon."
No duh.
This is why deltas will never be a convincing argument to nonbelievers. If someone is posting multiple times a day claiming that SOMETHING is going to happen, and you guys give Q the latitude to apply his prophecies over months and years, then that just looks like confirmation bias, nothing more.
If Hillary Clinton was actually arrested on October 30th of any year, would you be impressed or dismiss that as a random coincidence as well?
Because that is literally less odds than the McCain coincidence, only 1/365 chance of Q guessing a date of an arrest. Compared to 1/1,000 to guess the day and minute of McCain's death.
To be fair...You still know Jack shit and continue to show your ignorance...Not the first time and it certainly won't be your last...
Yes, your displeasure about me being allowed to talk here has been well and truly established by now. I get it. I’m sorry you feel that way.
The purpose of the Air Force One window proof isn’t to prove that Q was on Air Force One, it was to prove that when the tripcodes/website changed, the “new” Q had access t the exact same unpublished photo set that the “old” Q had. It could be any picture of clouds out of any window to prove this and it being on Air Force One (we believe) is just a bonus.
How would you explain how Ron (or any imposter) could acquire a second photo in the same unpublished photo set that the original Q posted? I am open to a logical explanation but I don’t think there is one.
Like I said, can you say with absolute confidence that those photos don’t exist in some obscure Flickr account somewhere? You truly believe you can account for absolutely every photo of… clouds… that exists?
Wasn’t this exactly the same thing that happened with George News? People assumed that the photos were unique, until someone found the raw photos in the random account of some random military photographer or something?
I just can’t accept on faith that a photo from one of the most photographed planes on the planet with hundreds of photographers cycling through it all the time is smoking-gun proof.
So a Google image search could not find the photo set of clouds, but somehow Ron Watkins tracked it down? What did he do? Just look through millions of private Flickr accounts until he found the exact same unpublished photo set? Come on man - think!
I’m running out of day to talk about this stuff in detail (harder for non-Q people to justify spending all day talking Q), but if you send me the pictures and evidence you want me to look at, I promise to do so relatively soon.
you are the one saying the disproof. read the comments in here with a link and explanation provided above your comment. it has the photos with explanation. its the proof that code monkey is not Q.